Motivational Interviewing: Addressing Interest Among Health Professions Students.

Aurianna M Lajaunie, Natalie M Vela, Hannah Kimmel Supron, Sarah Small, Kenneth Resnicow, P Elainee Poling
Author Information
  1. Aurianna M Lajaunie: University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI.
  2. Natalie M Vela: University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI.
  3. Hannah Kimmel Supron: University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI.
  4. Sarah Small: University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI.
  5. Kenneth Resnicow: University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI | Rogel Cancer Center, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI.
  6. P Elainee Poling: Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI.

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Motivational interviewing (MI) is a patient-centered approach to behavior change counseling that is used among health professionals across multiple disciplines. However, MI training has yet to be broadly offered to health professional (HP) students. This study aimed to evaluate student interest in MI and the efficacy of an MI workshop to assess whether MI training should be incorporated into HP curricula.
Methods: We conducted a needs assessment to evaluate HP student interest in learning MI. We then hosted a 6.5-hour MI workshop, followed by optional standardized patient encounters (SPEs). SPE performance was evaluated with a scored competency assessment.
Results: Needs assessment respondents (N=93) were predominantly medical students (53%), of which 49% were interested in primary care-related fields. Most (58%) reported receiving 0 to 2 hours of MI training in their required curricula, yet 87% intended to use MI and were interested in receiving training. Nineteen students attended the MI workshop. Postworkshop knowledge assessment (N=11) improved by an average of 34% (premean [��SD], 41% [��12]; postmean [��SD], 75% [��10]; <.001). The SPE mean competency score (5.09) surpassed the threshold for competence of 5.
Conclusions: HP students reported receiving minimal MI training in their curricula despite being highly interested in MI. Interested students responded to our interdisciplinary MI workshop and SPEs with high satisfaction, suggesting that HP schools may benefit from incorporating MI into their curricula. Nevertheless, response rates were low, and selection bias may have skewed responses toward more favorable perceptions of MI.

References

  1. Prev Med. 1995 Nov;24(6):546-52 [PMID: 8610076]
  2. Br J Gen Pract. 2005 Apr;55(513):305-12 [PMID: 15826439]
  3. NCHS Data Brief. 2022 Dec;(456):1-8 [PMID: 36598387]
  4. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2018 Jun;25(2):109-126 [PMID: 29480434]
  5. Health Psychol Rev. 2022 Sep;16(3):430-449 [PMID: 33970799]
  6. MedEdPORTAL. 2021 Feb 12;17:11104 [PMID: 33598544]
  7. Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Apr;98(4):499-505 [PMID: 25624118]
  8. MedEdPORTAL. 2018 Feb 12;14:10679 [PMID: 30800879]
  9. JAMA. 2004 Mar 10;291(10):1238-45 [PMID: 15010446]
  10. Health Promot Pract. 2019 Mar;20(2):239-250 [PMID: 29577772]
  11. J Dent Educ. 2021 Mar;85(3):287-292 [PMID: 33075849]
  12. N Engl J Med. 1996 Apr 11;334(15):996-8 [PMID: 8596615]
  13. J Genet Couns. 2022 Oct;31(5):1173-1182 [PMID: 35502606]
  14. J Foot Ankle Res. 2021 Feb 10;14(1):12 [PMID: 33568218]
  15. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2017 Jul 1;48(7):312-319 [PMID: 28658499]
  16. Am J Prev Med. 2010 Oct;39(4):321-8 [PMID: 20837282]
  17. MedEdPORTAL. 2019 Aug 23;15:10831 [PMID: 31773059]
  18. Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Apr;102(4):694-700 [PMID: 30482468]
  19. MedEdPORTAL. 2016 Sep 16;12:10455 [PMID: 31008233]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0MItrainingHPstudentsworkshopcurriculaassessmentinterestedreceivingMotivationalhealthyetevaluatestudentinterestSPEsSPEcompetencyreported[��SD]5mayBackgroundObjectives:interviewingpatient-centeredapproachbehaviorchangecounselingusedamongprofessionalsacrossmultipledisciplinesHoweverbroadlyofferedprofessionalstudyaimedefficacyassesswhetherincorporatedMethods:conductedneedslearninghosted65-hourfollowedoptionalstandardizedpatientencountersperformanceevaluatedscoredResults:NeedsrespondentsN=93predominantlymedical53%49%primarycare-relatedfields58%02hoursrequired87%intendeduseNineteenattendedPostworkshopknowledgeN=11improvedaverage34%premean41%[��12]postmean75%[��10]<001meanscore09surpassedthresholdcompetenceConclusions:minimaldespitehighlyInterestedrespondedinterdisciplinaryhighsatisfactionsuggestingschoolsbenefitincorporatingNeverthelessresponserateslowselectionbiasskewedresponsestowardfavorableperceptionsInterviewing:AddressingInterestAmongHealthProfessionsStudents

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.