Exploring the effects of taurolidine on tumor weight and microvessel density in a murine model of osteosarcoma.

Lisanne K A Neijenhuis, Leuta L Naumann, Sonia A M Ferkel, Samuel J S Rubin, Stephan Rogalla
Author Information
  1. Lisanne K A Neijenhuis: Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, 94305, USA.
  2. Leuta L Naumann: Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, 10117, Germany.
  3. Sonia A M Ferkel: Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, 94305, USA.
  4. Samuel J S Rubin: Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, 94305, USA.
  5. Stephan Rogalla: Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, 94305, USA.

Abstract

Background: Osteosarcoma is the most common malignant primary bone tumor. The prognosis for patients with disseminated disease remains very poor despite recent advancements in chemotherapy. Moreover, current treatment regimens bear a significant risk of serious side effects. Thus, there is an unmet clinical need for effective therapies with improved safety profiles. Taurolidine is an antibacterial agent that has been shown to induce cell death in different types of cancer cell lines.
Methods: In this study, we examined both the antineoplastic and antiangiogenic effects of taurolidine in animal models of osteosarcoma. K7M2 murine osteosarcoma cells were injected, both intramuscular and intraperitoneal, into 60 BALB/c mice on day zero. Animals were then randomized to receive treatment with taurolidine 2% (800 mg/kg), taurolidine 1% (400 mg/kg), or NaCl 0.9% control for seven days by intravenous or intraperitoneal administration.
Results: After 35 days, mice were euthanized, and the tumors were harvested for analysis. Eighteen mice were excluded from the analysis due to complications. Body weight was significantly lower in the 2% taurolidine intraperitoneal treatment group from day 9 to 21, consistent with elevated mortality in this group. Intraperitoneal tumor weight was significantly lower in the 1% ( = 0.003) and 2% ( = 0.006) intraperitoneal taurolidine treatment groups compared to the control. No antineoplastic effects were observed on intramuscular tumors or for intravenous administration of taurolidine. There were no significant differences in microvessel density or mitotic rate between treatment groups. Reduced body weight and elevated mortality in the 2% taurolidine intraperitoneal group suggest that the lower 1% dose is preferable.
Conclusions: In conclusion, there is no evidence of antiangiogenic activity, and the antitumor effects of taurolidine on osteosarcoma observed in this study are limited. Moreover, its toxic profile grants further evaluation. Given these observations, further research is necessary to refine the use of taurolidine in osteosarcoma treatment.

Keywords

References

  1. Int J Cancer. 2012 Sep 1;131(5):E804-12 [PMID: 22120774]
  2. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Feb 16;11:34 [PMID: 20158913]
  3. Pharm Dev Technol. 1997 Nov;2(4):345-56 [PMID: 9552463]
  4. Mol Ther. 2005 Feb;11(2):311-9 [PMID: 15668143]
  5. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2004 Sep;54(3):249-58 [PMID: 15173956]
  6. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Mar 07;29:21 [PMID: 20205945]
  7. Anticancer Drugs. 2005 Oct;16(9):917-21 [PMID: 16162968]
  8. Front Oncol. 2020 Jan 31;10:13 [PMID: 32082995]
  9. J Surg Res. 2007 Dec;143(2):372-8 [PMID: 17612567]
  10. Cell Prolif. 2021 Sep;54(9):e13102 [PMID: 34309110]
  11. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2014 May;36(4):e219-23 [PMID: 24762556]
  12. Eur J Cancer. 1996 Dec;32A(14):2474-84 [PMID: 9059336]
  13. N Engl J Med. 1991 Jan 3;324(1):1-8 [PMID: 1701519]
  14. J Clin Med. 2019 Dec 29;9(1): [PMID: 31905724]
  15. Oncol Rep. 2017 Aug;38(2):625-636 [PMID: 28656259]
  16. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2005;22(1):77-83 [PMID: 16132581]
  17. NPJ Precis Oncol. 2023 Jun 29;7(1):62 [PMID: 37386055]
  18. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2020 Sep;46(9):1661-1671 [PMID: 32715605]
  19. Invest New Drugs. 2020 Jun;38(3):690-699 [PMID: 31264069]
  20. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2022 Jun 13;23(1):38 [PMID: 35698168]
  21. Rheumatol Ther. 2017 Jun;4(1):25-43 [PMID: 27933467]
  22. PLoS One. 2010 Jan 28;5(1):e8927 [PMID: 20126631]
  23. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2002;19(2):169-73 [PMID: 11964081]
  24. Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1997;382(4 Suppl 1):S14-7 [PMID: 9333701]
  25. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Apr;17(4):1135-43 [PMID: 20039217]
  26. Invest New Drugs. 2007 Aug;25(4):305-12 [PMID: 17458504]
  27. Int J Oncol. 2008 Jun;32(6):1205-20 [PMID: 18497982]
  28. Nefrologia (Engl Ed). 2020 Mar - Apr;40(2):197-201 [PMID: 31208832]
  29. Cancer Res. 2001 Sep 15;61(18):6816-21 [PMID: 11559556]
  30. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Feb;22(2):162-164 [PMID: 33476594]
  31. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009 Dec;36(6):1058-63 [PMID: 19850492]
  32. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Jan;16(1):98-107 [PMID: 25498219]
  33. J Surg Oncol. 2007 Sep 1;96(3):241-8 [PMID: 17469118]
  34. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2022 Dec 8;8(1):77 [PMID: 36481668]
  35. Am J Surg. 1997 Sep;174(3):359-63 [PMID: 9324156]
  36. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Oct 11;32:74 [PMID: 24422857]
  37. J Surg Res. 2001 Dec;101(2):111-9 [PMID: 11735264]
  38. Anticancer Drugs. 2003 Apr;14(4):295-303 [PMID: 12679734]
  39. Anticancer Res. 2003 May-Jun;23(3B):2309-14 [PMID: 12894508]
  40. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2022 Sep;46(7):1535-1552 [PMID: 35233792]
  41. Clin Exp Med. 2016 Nov;16(4):577-584 [PMID: 26319790]
  42. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 May;98(19):e15582 [PMID: 31083238]
  43. J Neurosurg. 2005 Jun;102(6):1055-68 [PMID: 16028765]
  44. J Pharm Sci. 1983 Jun;72(6):705-7 [PMID: 6875837]
  45. Fortschr Med. 1983 Mar 31;101(12):545-50 [PMID: 6343207]
  46. BMC Vet Res. 2013 Jan 18;9:15 [PMID: 23331343]
  47. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2003;20(5):387-94 [PMID: 14524527]
  48. Oncol Rep. 2018 Dec;40(6):3743-3751 [PMID: 30272302]
  49. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2013 Apr;30(4):369-79 [PMID: 23076771]
  50. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2000;18(7):547-52 [PMID: 11688959]

MeSH Term

Animals
Taurine
Thiadiazines
Osteosarcoma
Mice
Disease Models, Animal
Bone Neoplasms
Tumor Burden
Microvascular Density
Mice, Inbred BALB C
Cell Line, Tumor
Antineoplastic Agents
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
Humans
Neovascularization, Pathologic

Chemicals

taurolidine
Taurine
Thiadiazines
Antineoplastic Agents
Angiogenesis Inhibitors

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0taurolidinetreatmenteffectsosteosarcomaintraperitoneal2%weighttumormice1%0lowergroupOsteosarcomaMoreoversignificantTaurolidinecellstudyantineoplasticantiangiogenicmodelsmurineintramusculardaymg/kgcontroldaysintravenousadministrationtumorsanalysissignificantlyelevatedmortality=groupsobservedmicrovesseldensityBackground:commonmalignantprimaryboneprognosispatientsdisseminateddiseaseremainspoordespiterecentadvancementschemotherapycurrentregimensbearriskserioussideThusunmetclinicalneedeffectivetherapiesimprovedsafetyprofilesantibacterialagentshowninducedeathdifferenttypescancerlinesMethods:examinedanimalK7M2cellsinjected60BALB/czeroAnimalsrandomizedreceive800400NaCl9%sevenResults:35euthanizedharvestedEighteenexcludedduecomplicationsBody921consistentIntraperitoneal003006compareddifferencesmitoticrateReducedbodysuggestdosepreferableConclusions:conclusionevidenceactivityantitumorlimitedtoxicprofilegrantsevaluationGivenobservationsresearchnecessaryrefineuseExploringmodelCancerChemotherapyMurine

Similar Articles

Cited By