Pets at work: integrating pet-friendly initiatives into human resources for enhanced workplace harmony.

Ana Junça-Silva, Marisa Galrito
Author Information
  1. Ana Junça-Silva: Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), Lisboa, Portugal. analjsilva@gmail.com.
  2. Marisa Galrito: Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), Lisboa, Portugal.

Abstract

AIMS: The representation of companion animals, or pets, has been changing recently. Research concerning how pets influence employees' work-related well-being has also started to take its first steps. This research aimed to analyze (1) how managers perceive pet-friendly practices and their main effects at work, and (2) the impact of such practices on employees' well-being and work engagement. Relying on the social exchange perspective and the self-determination theory it was hypothesized that pet-friendly practices would positively influence employees' well-being and work engagement by satisfying their three basic needs (autonomy, competence, and relatedness).
METHODOLOGY: Two studies with mixed methods were conducted. The first and exploratory study resorted to semi-structured interviews with six managers. The second was a two-wave study conducted with a large sample of workers (N = 379).
RESULTS: The first study highlighted the primary advantages and disadvantages of pet-friendly practices, along with the various obstacles and limitations, and proposed managerial strategies to overcome them. Managers generally expressed interest and enthusiasm about the topic but also pointed out challenges in implementing a pet-friendly strategy due to the limited number of empirical studies demonstrating its benefits. The second study's findings indicated that pet-friendly practices positively impacted employees' work engagement and well-being by fulfilling their needs for competence, autonomy, and relatedness.
ORIGINALITY: Overall, Portugal is seen as having a conservative culture, which slows the dissemination and implementation of these measures. To overcome these challenges, several managerial recommendations have been proposed. Raising awareness and fostering discussion on the topic are crucial steps toward integrating pet-friendly policies into human resources management.

Keywords

References

  1. West J Nurs Res. 2002 Oct;24(6):621-38 [PMID: 12365764]
  2. Animals (Basel). 2021 Jan 21;11(2): [PMID: 33494484]
  3. Animals (Basel). 2021 Jan 05;11(1): [PMID: 33466471]
  4. Psychosom Med. 2002 Sep-Oct;64(5):727-39 [PMID: 12271103]
  5. Rev Sci Tech. 2018 Apr;37(1):71-82 [PMID: 30209428]
  6. Front Psychol. 2012 Jul 09;3:234 [PMID: 22866043]
  7. J Pers. 1997 Sep;65(3):529-65 [PMID: 9327588]
  8. J Occup Rehabil. 2022 Mar;32(1):27-43 [PMID: 33909183]
  9. Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):68-78 [PMID: 11392867]
  10. BMC Psychol. 2023 Aug 29;11(1):251 [PMID: 37644577]
  11. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 May 08;14(5): [PMID: 28481317]
  12. J Clin Nurs. 2021 May;30(9-10):1429-1441 [PMID: 33555610]
  13. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2022 Apr;97(2):802-816 [PMID: 34894041]
  14. Animals (Basel). 2022 Jul 04;12(13): [PMID: 35804626]
  15. J Pers Assess. 2021 Mar-Apr;103(2):183-194 [PMID: 32167788]
  16. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2021 Feb;42:101298 [PMID: 33401185]
  17. BMC Cancer. 2018 Jun 4;18(1):629 [PMID: 29866065]
  18. Front Vet Sci. 2021 Nov 04;8:784491 [PMID: 34805347]
  19. J Appl Gerontol. 2022 Dec;41(12):2609-2623 [PMID: 36029015]
  20. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 28;20(1): [PMID: 36612840]
  21. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020 Jan 14;75(2):316-326 [PMID: 29474695]
  22. Anthrozoos. 2011 Sep 1;24(3):273-285 [PMID: 21857770]
  23. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 19;19(3): [PMID: 35162092]
  24. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Mar;76(3):482-97 [PMID: 10101878]
  25. Animals (Basel). 2020 Oct 14;10(10): [PMID: 33066335]
  26. J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):879-903 [PMID: 14516251]
  27. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;29(4):333-41 [PMID: 18462146]
  28. Psychol Rep. 2023 Jun;126(3):1069-1107 [PMID: 34886729]
  29. Psychol Bull. 1995 May;117(3):497-529 [PMID: 7777651]
  30. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 17;19(4): [PMID: 35206518]
  31. PLoS One. 2018 Feb 14;13(2):e0192072 [PMID: 29444137]

Grants

  1. UIDB/00315/2020/Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia

MeSH Term

Humans
Pets
Animals
Workplace
Adult
Female
Male
Middle Aged
Work Engagement

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0pet-friendlypracticesworkemployees'well-beingengagementfirstneedsstudypetsinfluencealsostepsmanagerspositivelyautonomycompetencerelatednessstudiesconductedsecondproposedmanagerialovercometopicchallengesintegratinghumanresourcesPetsAIMS:representationcompanionanimalschangingrecentlyResearchconcerningwork-relatedstartedtakeresearchaimedanalyze1perceivemaineffects2impactRelyingsocialexchangeperspectiveself-determinationtheoryhypothesizedsatisfyingthreebasicMETHODOLOGY:Twomixedmethodsexploratoryresortedsemi-structuredinterviewssixtwo-wavelargesampleworkersN = 379RESULTS:highlightedprimaryadvantagesdisadvantagesalongvariousobstacleslimitationsstrategiesManagersgenerallyexpressedinterestenthusiasmpointedimplementingstrategyduelimitednumberempiricaldemonstratingbenefitsstudy'sfindingsindicatedimpactedfulfillingORIGINALITY:OverallPortugalseenconservativecultureslowsdisseminationimplementationmeasuresseveralrecommendationsRaisingawarenessfosteringdiscussioncrucialtowardpoliciesmanagementwork:initiativesenhancedworkplaceharmonyBasicpsychologicalPet-friendlyWell-beingWork

Similar Articles

Cited By