OpenLB
Open Library of Bioscience
Advanced Search
The Analysis of verbal behavior
Jun, 2024;40 (1): 76-87.

Correspondence Between Vocal-Verbal Behavior and Go/No-Go Responses During the Successive Matching-to-Sample Procedure.

Jillian C Sordello, Robbie J Hanson, Caio F Miguel, Armando Angulo, Charles S Dingus
Author Information
  1. Jillian C Sordello: Department of Psychology, California State University, 6000 J Street, Sacramento, CA 95819 USA.
  2. Robbie J Hanson: College of Education and Human Services, Lindenwood University, St. Charles, MO USA.
  3. Caio F Miguel: Department of Psychology, California State University, 6000 J Street, Sacramento, CA 95819 USA.
  4. Armando Angulo: Department of Psychology, California State University, 6000 J Street, Sacramento, CA 95819 USA.
  5. Charles S Dingus: Department of Psychology, California State University, 6000 J Street, Sacramento, CA 95819 USA.
PMID: 38962521 DOI: 10.1007/s40616-024-00205-7

Abstract

In the current study, eight college students were exposed to a successive matching-to-sample (S-MTS) procedure utilizing non-verbal auditory stimuli consisting of common sounds. During emergent relations tests, participants were asked to talk aloud, and their vocal-verbal statements were transcribed and categorized as class-consistent, class-inconsistent, or irrelevant. All participants met emergence criterion for symmetry and four did so for transitivity/equivalence. Analysis of vocal-verbal statements showed a positive correlation between class-consistent statements emitted by participants and correct selection responses during S-MTS tasks. Such results suggest possible verbal mediation during emergent relations tests.

Keywords

Bidirectional naming Equivalence Mediation Protocol analysis Successive matching-to-sample

References

  1. Anal Verbal Behav. 2006;22:123-7 [PMID: 22477351]
  2. J Exp Anal Behav. 2018 May;109(3):533-550 [PMID: 29654650]
  3. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Jan;59(1):103-14 [PMID: 8433062]
  4. Anal Verbal Behav. 2016 Nov 4;32(2):242-264 [PMID: 30800629]
  5. J Exp Anal Behav. 2021 Jul;116(1):44-63 [PMID: 33955545]
  6. J Exp Anal Behav. 2015 Nov;104(3):223-40 [PMID: 26676181]
  7. Anal Verbal Behav. 2017 May 2;33(1):80-97 [PMID: 30854288]
  8. J Exp Anal Behav. 2015 Mar;103(2):332-48 [PMID: 25649198]
  9. J Exp Anal Behav. 2021 Jan;115(1):340-360 [PMID: 33319373]
  10. J Exp Anal Behav. 2020 Mar;113(2):322-339 [PMID: 32022281]
  11. J Exp Anal Behav. 2017 Sep;108(2):269-289 [PMID: 28850667]
  12. Anal Verbal Behav. 2016 Oct 25;32(2):125-138 [PMID: 30800621]
  13. J Exp Anal Behav. 2020 Dec 2;: [PMID: 33289134]
  14. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):5-22 [PMID: 7057129]
  15. Anal Verbal Behav. 1998;15:41-56 [PMID: 22477126]
  16. J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Jan;65(1):185-241 [PMID: 16812780]
  17. Anal Verbal Behav. 2022 Feb 15;38(1):54-64 [PMID: 35719423]
Journal Article

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0participantsstatementsmatching-to-sampleS-MTSemergentrelationstestsvocal-verbalclass-consistentSuccessivecurrentstudyeightcollegestudentsexposedsuccessiveprocedureutilizingnon-verbalauditorystimuliconsistingcommonsoundsaskedtalkaloudtranscribedcategorizedclass-inconsistentirrelevantmetemergencecriterionsymmetryfourtransitivity/equivalenceAnalysisshowedpositivecorrelationemittedcorrectselectionresponsestasksresultssuggestpossibleverbalmediationCorrespondenceVocal-VerbalBehaviorGo/No-GoResponsesMatching-to-SampleProcedureBidirectionalnamingEquivalenceMediationProtocolanalysis

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.