Genetic identification, morphology and distribution of subspecies in southern and western Switzerland (Reptilia, Squamata, Serpentes).

Andreas Schild, Hannes Baur, Stefan T Hertwig, Uwe Fritz, Sylvain Ursenbacher
Author Information
  1. Andreas Schild: Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 6, 3012 Bern, Switzerland University of Bern Bern Switzerland.
  2. Hannes Baur: Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 6, 3012 Bern, Switzerland University of Bern Bern Switzerland. ORCID
  3. Stefan T Hertwig: Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 6, 3012 Bern, Switzerland University of Bern Bern Switzerland. ORCID
  4. Uwe Fritz: Museum of Zoology (Museum für Tierkunde), Senckenberg Dresden, A. B. Meyer Building, 01109 Dresden, Germany Museum of Zoology (Museum für Tierkunde) Dresden Germany. ORCID
  5. Sylvain Ursenbacher: Department of Environmental Sciences, Section of Conservation Biology, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 32, 4056 Basel, Switzerland University of Basel Basel Switzerland. ORCID

Abstract

Most of Switzerland is inhabited by the nominotypical subspecies of the barred grass snake (), which is characterized by mitochondrial DNA lineage E. Only in the northeast of the country, the common grass snake () occurs and hybridizes with in a narrow contact zone. However, we discovered that in southern and western Switzerland barred grass snakes representing another mtDNA lineage (lineage C) are widely distributed. Lineage C is typical for Alpine populations of the southern subspecies . Our microsatellite analyses of the Swiss samples revealed differences between the two subspecies and also a substructure with two clusters in each subspecies. Furthermore, we discovered a contact and hybrid zone of and along the northern shore of Lake Geneva and also confirm that interbreeding with alien common grass snakes (, mtDNA lineage 7) occurs there. This finding is of concern for nature conservation and measures should be taken to prevent further genetic pollution. Using morphometrics, we found no differences between the two subspecies of , while was slightly distinct from .

Keywords

References

  1. Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 7;7(1):7378 [PMID: 28785033]
  2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Oct 3;120(40):e2302424120 [PMID: 37748058]
  3. Mol Ecol. 2005 Jul;14(8):2611-20 [PMID: 15969739]
  4. Mol Ecol Resour. 2011 Mar;11(2):353-7 [PMID: 21429143]
  5. Syst Entomol. 2014 Oct;39(4):691-709 [PMID: 26074661]
  6. Syst Biol. 2011 Dec;60(6):813-25 [PMID: 21828084]
  7. Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 29;8(1):1821 [PMID: 29379101]
  8. Genetics. 2000 Jun;155(2):945-59 [PMID: 10835412]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0subspeciesgrasslineageSwitzerlandDNAsoutherntwobarredsnakemitochondrialcommonoccurscontactzonediscoveredwesternsnakesmtDNACdifferencesalsomorphometricsinhabitednominotypicalcharacterizedEnortheastcountryhybridizesnarrowHoweverrepresentinganotherwidelydistributedLineagetypicalAlpinepopulationsmicrosatelliteanalysesSwisssamplesrevealedsubstructureclustersFurthermorehybridalongnorthernshoreLakeGenevaconfirminterbreedingalien7findingconcernnatureconservationmeasurestakenpreventgeneticpollutionUsingfoundslightlydistinctGeneticidentificationmorphologydistributionReptiliaSquamataSerpentesMicrosatellitesnucleartaxonomy

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.