Faith and vaccination: a scoping review of the relationships between religious beliefs and vaccine hesitancy.

Muhammad Haaris Tiwana, Julia Smith
Author Information
  1. Muhammad Haaris Tiwana: Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Blusson Hall, Room 11810, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada. mhtiwana@sfu.ca.
  2. Julia Smith: Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Blusson Hall, Room 11810, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Throughout history, vaccines have proven effective in addressing and preventing widespread outbreaks, leading to a decrease in the spread and fatality rates of infectious diseases. In a time where vaccine hesitancy poses a significant challenge to public health, it is important to identify the intricate interplay of factors exemplified at the individual and societal levels which influence vaccination behaviours. Through this analysis, we aim to shed new light on the dynamics of vaccine hesitancy among religious groups, contributing to the broader effort to promote vaccine uptake, dispel misunderstandings, and encourage constructive dialogue with these groups.
METHODS: We used the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) using the 20-point checklist to guide this review. The inclusion criteria for our study were that the literature should be in English, concerned with vaccine hesitancy as the focus of study, study the impact religiosity or religious beliefs as either an outcome or control variable, concerning population levels, and be peer-reviewed.
RESULTS: We analysed 14 peer-reviewed articles that included components related to religiosity or religious beliefs and their impact on vaccine hesitancy published until September 2023. All the articles were published in approximately the last decade between 2012 and 2023, with only 4 of the articles published before 2020. Out of the 14 studies included in our review, twelve utilized quantitative methods, while the remaining two employed qualitative approaches. Among the studies included in our analysis, we found various approaches to categorizing religious belief and identity. In most studies when religion is uniformly regarded as the sole determinant of vaccine hesitancy, it consistently emerges as a significant factor in contributing to vaccine hesitancy. All studies in our review reported sociodemographic factors to some degree related to vaccine hesitancy within their sample populations. Our analysis underscored the need for nuanced approaches to addressing vaccine hesitancy among religious groups.
CONCLUSION: Vaccine hesitancy is a complex issue and driven by a myriad of individual and societal factors among which religious beliefs is commonly associated to be a driver of higher levels among populations.

Keywords

References

  1. Vaccine. 2014 Nov 20;32(49):6649-54 [PMID: 25280436]
  2. Vaccine. 2022 Nov 28;40(50):7280-7287 [PMID: 36334965]
  3. Vaccine. 2017 Nov 7;35(47):6438-6443 [PMID: 29031691]
  4. Soc Sci Med. 2021 Feb;270:113684 [PMID: 33485008]
  5. PLoS One. 2022 Mar 23;17(3):e0265496 [PMID: 35320309]
  6. Rev Relig Res. 2022;64(3):475-495 [PMID: 35702507]
  7. Front Sociol. 2021 Mar 26;6:642662 [PMID: 33869589]
  8. Front Public Health. 2022 Feb 07;10:824560 [PMID: 35198525]
  9. Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473 [PMID: 30178033]
  10. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018 Mar;44(3):384-405 [PMID: 29191107]
  11. PLoS One. 2020 Oct 1;15(10):e0239754 [PMID: 33002092]
  12. PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e19381 [PMID: 21602931]
  13. Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Jan;102(1):172-179 [PMID: 30166057]
  14. J Public Health (Oxf). 2021 Sep 22;43(3):e529-e530 [PMID: 34080617]
  15. Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Dec;6(12):1609-1610 [PMID: 36418535]
  16. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 17;20(4): [PMID: 36834320]
  17. JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Mar 1;2(3):e210434 [PMID: 36218456]
  18. J Paediatr Child Health. 2011 May;47(5):276-81 [PMID: 21244560]
  19. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 15;20(4): [PMID: 36834071]
  20. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022 Nov 30;18(5):2045855 [PMID: 35439106]
  21. Am J Prev Med. 2021 Jan;60(1 Suppl 1):S44-S52 [PMID: 33189503]
  22. Vaccine. 2015 Aug 14;33(34):4180-90 [PMID: 25896377]
  23. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 19;18(1):143 [PMID: 30453902]
  24. J Relig Health. 2021 Feb;60(1):65-80 [PMID: 33125543]
  25. Vaccine. 2015 Aug 14;33(34):4161-4 [PMID: 25896383]
  26. BMC Public Health. 2012 Jan 20;12:57 [PMID: 22264347]
  27. BMC Public Health. 2022 May 25;22(1):1047 [PMID: 35614396]
  28. Vaccine. 2021 Oct 15;39(43):6351-6355 [PMID: 34544600]
  29. Vaccine. 2014 Apr 17;32(19):2150-9 [PMID: 24598724]
  30. Med. 2021 May 14;2(5):498-501 [PMID: 33851144]
  31. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 04;18(17): [PMID: 34501932]
  32. Am J Prev Med. 2021 Jun;60(6):781-791 [PMID: 33840546]
  33. BMJ. 2002 Aug 24;325(7361):430-2 [PMID: 12193361]
  34. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 20;18(18): [PMID: 34574827]
  35. BMC Public Health. 2012 Jun 06;12:408 [PMID: 22672710]
  36. Front Pharmacol. 2018 May 30;9:574 [PMID: 29899702]
  37. Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 20;10:979424 [PMID: 36203681]
  38. Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Jan 25;11(2): [PMID: 36851140]
  39. Vaccine. 2013 Apr 12;31(16):2011-23 [PMID: 23499565]

MeSH Term

Humans
Vaccination Hesitancy
Religion
Vaccination
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0hesitancyvaccinereligiousamongreviewbeliefsstudiesfactorslevelsanalysisgroupsstudyarticlesincludedpublishedapproachesaddressingsignificanthealthindividualsocietalcontributingimpactreligiositypeer-reviewed14related2023populationsVaccineBACKGROUND:ThroughouthistoryvaccinesproveneffectivepreventingwidespreadoutbreaksleadingdecreasespreadfatalityratesinfectiousdiseasestimeposeschallengepublicimportantidentifyintricateinterplayexemplifiedinfluencevaccinationbehavioursaimshednewlightdynamicsbroadereffortpromoteuptakedispelmisunderstandingsencourageconstructivedialogueMETHODS:usedPRISMA-ScRPreferredReportingItemsSystematicreviewsMeta-AnalysesextensionScopingReviewsusing20-pointchecklistguideinclusioncriterialiteratureEnglishconcernedfocuseitheroutcomecontrolvariableconcerningpopulationRESULTS:analysedcomponentsSeptemberapproximatelylastdecade201242020twelveutilizedquantitativemethodsremainingtwoemployedqualitativeAmongfoundvariouscategorizingbeliefidentityreligionuniformlyregardedsoledeterminantconsistentlyemergesfactorreportedsociodemographicdegreewithinsampleunderscoredneednuancedCONCLUSION:complexissuedrivenmyriadcommonlyassociateddriverhigherFaithvaccination:scopingrelationshipsPublicReligionSociodemographic

Similar Articles

Cited By