Effects of Edible Insect Powders as Meat Partial Substitute on Physicochemical Properties and Storage Stability of Pork Patties.

Nayoung Choi, Sanghun Park, Yunhwan Park, Gyutae Park, Sehyuk Oh, Yun-A Kim, Youngho Lim, Soyoung Jang, Youngjin Kim, Ki-Su Ahn, Xi Feng, Jungseok Choi
Author Information
  1. Nayoung Choi: Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea. ORCID
  2. Sanghun Park: Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea. ORCID
  3. Yunhwan Park: Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea. ORCID
  4. Gyutae Park: Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea. ORCID
  5. Sehyuk Oh: Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea. ORCID
  6. Yun-A Kim: Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea. ORCID
  7. Youngho Lim: Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea. ORCID
  8. Soyoung Jang: Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea. ORCID
  9. Youngjin Kim: Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea. ORCID
  10. Ki-Su Ahn: Chungcheongbuk-do Research and Extension Services, Cheongju 28130, Korea. ORCID
  11. Xi Feng: Department of Nutrition, Food Science, and Packaging, San Jose State University, San Jose, CA 95192, United States. ORCID
  12. Jungseok Choi: Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea. ORCID

Abstract

In this study, physicochemical and antioxidant properties, and storage stability (1, 3, and 7 days) of pork patties added with edible insect powders (EIP) of four species (Larvae of , , , and ) as meat partial substitutes were investigated. Twenty percent of each EIP was added to pork patties, and four treatments were prepared. On the other hand, two control groups were set, one with 0.1 g of ascorbic acid and the other without anything. Adding EIP decreased water content but increased protein, fat, carbohydrate, and ash contents. In addition, the use of EIP increased the water holding capacity and texture properties as well as decreased the cooking loss. However, the sensory evaluation and storage stability were negatively affected by the addition of EIP. The 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical scavenging activity had a positive effect on storage stability. It is believed that the addition of EIP resulted in high antioxidants due to the presence of polyphenol compounds in EIP. These results indicate that EIP has great potential to be used as meat partial substitute to improve the quality improvement and antioxidant in pork patties. However, in order to improve storage stability and consumer preference, further research is needed to apply it to patties by reducing the amount of EIP or adding auxiliary ingredients.

Keywords

References

  1. PLoS One. 2010 Dec 29;5(12):e14445 [PMID: 21206900]
  2. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2009 Feb;20(1):65-71 [PMID: 18977308]
  3. Foods. 2023 Mar 16;12(6): [PMID: 36981188]
  4. Insects. 2023 Oct 13;14(10): [PMID: 37887823]
  5. J Agric Food Chem. 2008 Aug 13;56(15):6185-205 [PMID: 18593176]
  6. Molecules. 2023 Jan 10;28(2): [PMID: 36677756]
  7. Food Chem. 2019 Aug 15;289:130-138 [PMID: 30955594]
  8. Foods. 2022 Feb 27;11(5): [PMID: 35267337]
  9. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014 Aug;1321:1-19 [PMID: 25123207]
  10. Meat Sci. 2017 Jul;129:111-119 [PMID: 28273584]
  11. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1996 Mar 27;220(3):526-31 [PMID: 8607799]
  12. Food Chem. 2021 Mar 29;357:129727 [PMID: 33964628]
  13. Foods. 2023 Mar 27;12(7): [PMID: 37048242]
  14. Insects. 2023 May 22;14(5): [PMID: 37233115]
  15. J Food Sci. 2017 Dec;82(12):2787-2793 [PMID: 29095501]
  16. Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour. 2017;37(5):617-625 [PMID: 29147084]
  17. Foods. 2022 Oct 08;11(19): [PMID: 36230206]
  18. FEBS Lett. 1999 Sep 17;458(2):112-6 [PMID: 10481047]
  19. Int J Food Sci. 2021 Mar 23;2021:5580976 [PMID: 33834060]
  20. Front Nutr. 2019 Jul 15;6:106 [PMID: 31380385]
  21. Nutr Rev. 2017 Dec 1;75(12):1035-1045 [PMID: 29202184]
  22. Insect Mol Biol. 2001 Aug;10(4):293-302 [PMID: 11520352]
  23. Foods. 2022 Oct 25;11(21): [PMID: 36359967]
  24. Adv Food Nutr Res. 2022;101:1-15 [PMID: 35940701]
  25. Front Nutr. 2023 Mar 01;10:1133342 [PMID: 36937358]
  26. Phytochem Anal. 2007 Jan-Feb;18(1):24-32 [PMID: 17260695]
  27. Meat Sci. 2003 Mar;63(3):317-24 [PMID: 22062383]
  28. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol. 2003 Feb;52(2):92-103 [PMID: 12529864]
  29. J Anim Sci Technol. 2021 Mar;63(2):417-425 [PMID: 33987615]
  30. Nat Prod Res. 2012;26(6):510-7 [PMID: 21756122]
  31. Foods. 2022 Jan 24;11(3): [PMID: 35159477]
  32. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2013 May;57(5):802-23 [PMID: 23471778]
  33. J Insect Physiol. 2015 Feb;73:1-10 [PMID: 25576652]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0EIPstoragestabilitypattiesantioxidantporkpartialadditionproperties1addedediblefourmeatdecreasedwaterincreasedcookinglossHowevercompoundssubstituteimprovestudyphysicochemical37daysinsectpowdersspeciesLarvaesubstitutesinvestigatedTwentypercenttreatmentspreparedhandtwocontrolgroupssetone0gascorbicacidwithoutanythingAddingcontentproteinfatcarbohydrateashcontentsuseholdingcapacitytexturewellsensoryevaluationnegativelyaffected22-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazylradicalscavengingactivitypositiveeffectbelievedresultedhighantioxidantsduepresencepolyphenolresultsindicategreatpotentialusedqualityimprovementorderconsumerpreferenceresearchneededapplyreducingamountaddingauxiliaryingredientsEffectsEdibleInsectPowdersMeatPartialSubstitutePhysicochemicalPropertiesStorageStabilityPorkPattiesinsectsphenolic

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)