Impact of Patient Race/Ethnicity on Premium Intraocular Lens Utilization.

Elena M Solli, Christina R Prescott
Author Information
  1. Elena M Solli: Department of Ophthalmology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the relationship between social determinants of health and the likelihood of receiving a premium intraocular lens (IOL) at the time of cataract surgery.
METHODS: Retrospective chart review of a single-center, academic ophthalmology practice over a one-year period, with a primary outcome measure of placement of either a premium or standard IOL. We used logistic regression to calculate the odds of receiving a premium IOL, stratifying patients based on self-identified race/ethnicity, age, sex, insurance type (private insurance vs. Medicare or Medicaid), estimated household income (based on median household income for zip code), and presence of ocular pathology.
RESULTS: Compared with self-identified White patients, Black patients were least likely to receive premium IOLs (OR=0.220, 95% CI 0.137-0.340, P <0.001), followed by Hispanic patients (OR=0.308, 95% CI 0.104-0.730) and Asian patients (OR=0.479, 95% CI 0.302-0.734). patients with Medicare or Medicaid insurance were also less likely to receive premium IOLs (OR 0.522, 95% CI 0.336-0.784).
CONCLUSIONS: White patients in our practice were more likely to receive premium IOLs than non-White patients, even when controlling for age, sex, insurance type, estimated median household income, and presence of ocular comorbidities. The underlying reason for this disparity should be explored further.

References

  1. Zhang X, Cotch MF, Ryskulova A, et al. Vision health disparities in the United States by race/ethnicity, education, and economic status: Findings from two nationally representative surveys. Am J Ophthalmol 2012;154:S53���S62 e1.
  2. West SK, Munoz B, Schein OD, et al. Racial differences in lens opacities: The salisbury eye evaluation (SEE) project. Am J Epidemiol 1998;148:1033���1039.
  3. Shahbazi S, Studnicki J, Warner-Hillard CW. A cross-sectional retrospective analysis of the racial and geographic variations in cataract surgery. PLoS One 2015;10:e0142459.
  4. Awidi AA, Wang J, Varadaraj V, et al. The impact of social determinants of health on vision loss from cataracts and cataract surgery utilization in the United States-A national health interview survey analysis. Am J Ophthalmol 2023;254:44���53.
  5. Kauh CY, Blachley TS, Lichter PR, et al. Geographic variation in the rate and timing of cataract surgery among US communities. JAMA Ophthalmol 2016;134:267���276.
  6. Stone JS, Fukuoka H, Weinreb RN, et al. Relationship between race, insurance coverage, and visual acuity at the time of cataract surgery. Eye Contact Lens 2018;44:393���398.
  7. Richter GM, Chung J, Azen SP, et al. Prevalence of visually significant cataract and factors associated with unmet need for cataract surgery: Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Ophthalmology 2009;116:2327���2335.
  8. Broman AT, Hafiz G, Munoz B, et al. Cataract and barriers to cataract surgery in a US Hispanic population: Proyecto VER. Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:1231���1236.
  9. Rahmani B, Tielsch JM, Katz J, et al. The cause-specific prevalence of visual impairment in an urban population. The Baltimore Eye Survey. Ophthalmology 1996;103:1721���1726.
  10. Hu JQ, Sarkar R, Sella R, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of multifocal intraocular lenses compared to monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 2019;208:305���312.
  11. Rampat R, Gatinel D. Multifocal and extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses in 2020. Ophthalmology 2021;128:e164���e185.
  12. Wang SY, Stem MS, Oren G, et al. Patient-centered and visual quality outcomes of premium cataract surgery: A systematic review. Eur J Ophthalmol 2017;27:387���401.
  13. Cha E, Arsiwala-Scheppach LT, Srikumaran D, et al. Patient utilization of premium intraocular lenses before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eye Contact Lens 2023;49:292���295.
  14. Buscho SE, Sharifi A, Cayenne S, et al. Racial disparities in cataract surgery timeline and intraocular lens selection: A retrospective study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2023;64:OD50.
  15. Social Determinants of Health Database (Beta Version). Content last reviewed December 2020. Available at: https://www.ahrq.gov/sdoh/data-analytics/sdoh-data.html . Accessed November 23, 2023.

MeSH Term

Humans
Female
Male
Retrospective Studies
Aged
Lenses, Intraocular
United States
Middle Aged
Lens Implantation, Intraocular
Ethnicity
Medicare
Aged, 80 and over
Cataract Extraction
Adult
Racial Groups
Medicaid

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0patientspremium0insurance95%CIIOLhouseholdincomelikelyreceiveIOLsOR=0receivingpracticebasedself-identifiedagesextypeMedicareMedicaidestimatedmedianpresenceocularWhiteOBJECTIVES:evaluaterelationshipsocialdeterminantshealthlikelihoodintraocularlenstimecataractsurgeryMETHODS:Retrospectivechartreviewsingle-centeracademicophthalmologyone-yearperiodprimaryoutcomemeasureplacementeitherstandardusedlogisticregressioncalculateoddsstratifyingrace/ethnicityprivatevszipcodepathologyRESULTS:ComparedBlackleast220137-0340P<0001followedHispanic308104-0730Asian479302-0734PatientsalsolessOR522336-0784CONCLUSIONS:non-WhiteevencontrollingcomorbiditiesunderlyingreasondisparityexploredfurtherImpactPatientRace/EthnicityPremiumIntraocularLensUtilization

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.