BOMS: blockchain-enabled organ matching system.

Ikechi Saviour Igboanusi, Chigozie Athanasius Nnadiekwe, Joseph Uche Ogbede, Dong-Seong Kim, Artem Lensky
Author Information
  1. Ikechi Saviour Igboanusi: ICT Convergence Research Center, Kumoh National Institute of Technology, Gumi, South Korea. ikechisaviour@kumoh.ac.kr.
  2. Chigozie Athanasius Nnadiekwe: Department of IT Convergence Engineering, Kumoh National Institute of Technology, Gumi, South Korea.
  3. Joseph Uche Ogbede: Vascular Biology Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
  4. Dong-Seong Kim: Department of IT Convergence Engineering, Kumoh National Institute of Technology, Gumi, South Korea. dskim@kumoh.ac.kr.
  5. Artem Lensky: School of Engineering and Technology, The University of New South Wales, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

Abstract

This work proposes a Blockchain-enabled Organ Matching System (BOMS) designed to manage the process of matching, storing, and sharing information. Biological factors are incorporated into matching and the cross-matching process is implemented into the smart contracts. Privacy is guaranteed by using patient-associated blockchain addresses, without transmitting or using patient personal records in the matching process. The matching algorithm implemented as a smart contract is verifiable by any party. Clinical records, process updates, and matching results are also stored on the blockchain, providing tamper-resistance of recipient's records and the recipients' waiting queue. The system also is capable of handling cases in which there is a donor without an immediate compatible recipient. The system is implemented on the Ethereum blockchain and several scenarios were tested. The performance of the proposed system is compared to other existing organ donation systems, and ours outperformed any existing organ matching system built on blockchain. BOMS is tested to ascertain its compatibility with public, private, and consortium blockchain networks, checks for security vulnerabilities and cross-matching efficiency. The implementation codes are available online.

Keywords

References

  1. J Med Ethics. 2000 Oct;26(5):323-9 [PMID: 11055033]
  2. Am J Bioeth. 2005 Fall;5(4):6-10 [PMID: 16109680]
  3. World J Methodol. 2022 Jan 20;12(1):32-42 [PMID: 35117980]
  4. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020 Oct 7;15(10):1455-1463 [PMID: 32843375]
  5. Int J Immunogenet. 2022 Feb;49(1):30-38 [PMID: 34904369]
  6. Am J Transplant. 2003;3 Suppl 4:29-40 [PMID: 12694048]
  7. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002 Aug;13(8):2152-9 [PMID: 12138149]
  8. Electron Mark. 2022;32(3):1779-1794 [PMID: 35602109]
  9. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 Jun;21(6):1022-9 [PMID: 20488949]
  10. Am J Transplant. 2004 Dec;4(12):2067-74 [PMID: 15575911]
  11. Crit Care Clin. 2014 Oct;30(4):813-31 [PMID: 25257743]
  12. Health Policy. 1990 Nov;16(2):127-31 [PMID: 10108673]
  13. Transpl Int. 2023 Feb 08;36:10800 [PMID: 36846602]
  14. Transplantation. 2019 Mar;103(3):573-580 [PMID: 29684002]
  15. Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Sep;55(5):720-7 [PMID: 22670038]
  16. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2020 Feb;25(1):66-73 [PMID: 31815789]
  17. Am J Transplant. 2004;4 Suppl 9:27-37 [PMID: 15113353]
  18. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017 Sep;36(9):940-947 [PMID: 28259595]
  19. Patterns (N Y). 2023 Apr 05;4(4):100734 [PMID: 37123437]
  20. Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 11;14(1):16069 [PMID: 38992054]
  21. Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2021 Apr;35(2):100585 [PMID: 33071161]
  22. Lancet. 2009 Jan 31;373(9661):423-31 [PMID: 19186274]
  23. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2020 Aug;25(4):393-398 [PMID: 32487888]
  24. Transplant Proc. 2018 Dec;50(10):3010-3016 [PMID: 30577160]

MeSH Term

Humans
Tissue and Organ Procurement
Blockchain
Algorithms
Tissue Donors
Computer Security

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0matchingblockchainsystemprocessimplementedrecordsorganOrganBOMScross-matchingsmartusingwithoutcontractalsoexistingworkproposesBlockchain-enabledMatchingSystemdesignedmanagestoringsharinginformationBiologicalfactorsincorporatedcontractsPrivacyguaranteedpatient-associatedaddressestransmittingpatientpersonalalgorithmverifiablepartyClinicalupdatesresultsstoredprovidingtamper-resistancerecipient'srecipients'waitingqueuecapablehandlingcasesdonorimmediatecompatiblerecipientEthereumseveralscenarioswere testedperformanceproposedcompareddonationsystemsoutperformedbuilttestedascertaincompatibilitypublicprivateconsortiumnetworkscheckssecurityvulnerabilitiesefficiencyimplementationcodesavailableonlineBOMS:blockchain-enabledBlockchainCross-matchingMedicaldataSmart

Similar Articles

Cited By