What is the Role of Spatial Attention in Statistical Learning During Visual Search?

Aidai Golan, Aniruddha Ramgir, Dominique Lamy
Author Information
  1. Aidai Golan: School of Psychological Sciences, Tel Aviv University, IL. ORCID
  2. Aniruddha Ramgir: School of Psychological Sciences, Tel Aviv University, IL. ORCID
  3. Dominique Lamy: School of Psychological Sciences, Tel Aviv University, IL. ORCID

Abstract

Our ability to learn the regularities embedded in our environment is a fundamental aspect of our cognitive system. Does such statistical learning depend on attention? Research on this topic is scarce and has yielded mixed findings. In this preregistered study, we examined the role of spatial attention in statistical learning, and specifically in learned distractor-location suppression. This phenomenon refers to the finding that during visual search, participants are better at ignoring a salient distractor at a high-probability location than at low-probability locations - a bias persisting long after the probability imbalance has ceased. Participants searched for a shape-singleton target and a color-singleton distractor was sometimes present. During the learning phase, the color-singleton distractor was more likely to appear in the high-probability location than in the low-probability locations. Crucially, we manipulated spatial attention by having the experimental group focus their attention on the target's location in advance of the search display, using a 100%-informative spatial precue, while the control group was presented with a neutral, uninformative cue. During the subsequent test phase, the color-singleton distractor was equally likely to appear at any location and there were no cues. As expected, the results for the neutral-cue group replicated previous findings. Crucially, for the informative-cue group, interference from the distractor was minimal when attention was diverted from it (during learning) and no statistical learning was observed during test. Intertrial priming accounted for the small statistical-learning effect found during learning. These findings show that statistical learning in visual search requires attention.

Keywords

References

  1. J Vis. 2021 Nov 1;21(12):3 [PMID: 34739036]
  2. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Oct;80(7):1763-1774 [PMID: 29968080]
  3. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Jan;77(1):78-96 [PMID: 25172196]
  4. Cogn Psychol. 1998 Jun;36(1):28-71 [PMID: 9679076]
  5. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 Mar;46(3):324-334 [PMID: 31886698]
  6. Science. 1996 Dec 13;274(5294):1926-8 [PMID: 8943209]
  7. Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 31;10(1):22450 [PMID: 33384423]
  8. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 May;112:279-299 [PMID: 32018038]
  9. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Jan;44(1):13-17 [PMID: 29309194]
  10. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Jan;77(1):50-66 [PMID: 25113853]
  11. Psychol Sci. 2004 Jul;15(7):460-6 [PMID: 15200630]
  12. Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Feb;27(1):86-95 [PMID: 31848910]
  13. Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 22;10(1):904 [PMID: 31969579]
  14. Psychol Sci. 2002 Nov;13(6):520-5 [PMID: 12430835]
  15. J Cogn. 2019 Jul 19;2(1):16 [PMID: 31517234]
  16. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Aug;41(4):1112-23 [PMID: 26010589]
  17. Cortex. 2020 Oct;131:54-65 [PMID: 32801075]
  18. Cortex. 2018 May;102:107-120 [PMID: 28734549]
  19. Psychol Sci. 2013 May;24(5):667-77 [PMID: 23558552]
  20. Cognition. 1999 Feb 1;70(1):27-52 [PMID: 10193055]
  21. Cortex. 2018 May;102:67-95 [PMID: 29096874]
  22. Percept Psychophys. 1991 Jan;49(1):83-90 [PMID: 2011456]
  23. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 May;28(3):458-67 [PMID: 12018498]
  24. Mem Cognit. 1994 Nov;22(6):657-72 [PMID: 7808275]
  25. J Comp Neurol. 1990 Feb 22;292(4):497-523 [PMID: 2324310]
  26. Percept Psychophys. 1992 Jun;51(6):599-606 [PMID: 1620571]
  27. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Oct;77(7):2217-28 [PMID: 26037211]
  28. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Mar;45(3):419-433 [PMID: 30802131]
  29. J Cogn. 2022 Oct 17;5(1):47 [PMID: 36349189]
  30. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1990 Feb;16(1):121-34 [PMID: 2137514]
  31. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Jan 4;: [PMID: 38177944]
  32. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2005 Nov;134(4):552-64 [PMID: 16316291]
  33. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2024 Feb;50(2):244-265 [PMID: 36972107]
  34. Psychol Bull. 2019 Dec;145(12):1128-1153 [PMID: 31580089]
  35. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 May;80(4):860-870 [PMID: 29476331]
  36. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Dec;147(12):1827-1850 [PMID: 30359073]
  37. Vision Res. 2013 Jan 14;76:31-42 [PMID: 23099046]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0learningattentionstatisticaldistractorsearchlocationgroupfindingsspatialvisualcolor-singletondistractor-locationsuppressionhigh-probabilitylow-probabilitylocationsphaselikelyappearCruciallytestabilitylearnregularitiesembeddedenvironmentfundamentalaspectcognitivesystemdependattention?Researchtopicscarceyieldedmixedpreregisteredstudyexaminedrolespecificallylearnedphenomenonrefersfindingparticipantsbetterignoringsalient-biaspersistinglongprobabilityimbalanceceasedParticipantssearchedshape-singletontargetsometimespresentmanipulatedexperimentalfocustarget'sadvancedisplayusing100%-informativeprecuecontrolpresentedneutraluninformativecuesubsequentequallycuesexpectedresultsneutral-cuereplicatedpreviousinformative-cueinterferenceminimaldivertedobservedIntertrialprimingaccountedsmallstatistical-learningeffectfoundshowrequiresRoleSpatialAttentionStatisticalLearningVisualSearch?Spatial

Similar Articles

Cited By