Belief in a just world and fair behavior among clinical nurses: a moderated mediation model of empathy and observer justice sensitivity.

Youjuan Hong, Bo Zhu, Caimei Chen, Meichai Qiu, Liting Liu
Author Information
  1. Youjuan Hong: School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China. yjhong_zp@126.com.
  2. Bo Zhu: School of Marxism, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
  3. Caimei Chen: Critical Care Department, Longyan People's Hospital, Longyan, Fujian, China.
  4. Meichai Qiu: Center for information Management, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
  5. Liting Liu: School of Management Studies, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai, China.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Exploration of the relationship between nursing staffs' justice in belief world and fair behavior is important to promote equity and access to health services in health organizations, as well as to enhance the quality of care. In order to further dissect the influencing factors of fair behavior among clinical nurses, the current study aims to investigate how belief in a just world influences the fair behavior among nurses. Based on the belief in a just world theory, the empathy-altruism theory and the protective-protective model, the current study aimed to provide a deeper understanding of the effect of belief in a just world on fair behavior by investigating the mediating role of empathy and the moderating role of observer justice sensitivity.
METHOD: This was a cross-sectional study. 571 registered clinical nurses were included from five hospitals in Fuzhou through a convenience sampling method. Measurements included Chinese translations of belief in a just world scale, empathy scale, observer justice sensitivity scale, fair behavior scale. SPSS 22.0 was used to describe descriptive statistics and the variables' Pearson correlation coefficient. SPSS PROCESS macro Model 4 and model 14 were used to examine the mediation and the moderation between the relationship of belief in a just world and fairness behavior.
RESULT: The results shower that fairness behavior was positively correlated with one's belief in a just world (r = 0.26, p < 0.01); (2)empathy mediated the relationship between belief in a just world and fair behavior. The mediation model explains 20.83%; (3) Observer justice sensitivity moderated the relationship between empathy and fair behavior.
CONCLUSIONS: Belief in a just world, empathy, and observer justice sensitivity were motivations for nurses' fair behavior. Nursing administrators should focus on cultivating nurses' belief in a just world, their empathy abilities, and positive qualities of justice sensitivity to enhance fair behavior in a healthcare setting.

Keywords

References

  1. PLoS One. 2022 Jun 9;17(6):e0268681 [PMID: 35679271]
  2. Curr Psychol. 2022 Jan 8;:1-13 [PMID: 35035184]
  3. Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 06;12:670373 [PMID: 34690857]
  4. Front Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 02;12:782246 [PMID: 34925107]
  5. BMC Prim Care. 2023 Jan 21;24(1):24 [PMID: 36670353]
  6. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Jul;117(1):124-141 [PMID: 30945902]
  7. Behav Anal Pract. 2021 Oct 18;15(2):619-634 [PMID: 35692530]
  8. Health Equity. 2021 Jun 25;5(1):457-465 [PMID: 34235371]
  9. Int J Psychol. 2020 Apr;55(2):192-200 [PMID: 30569526]
  10. J Exp Child Psychol. 2023 Feb;226:105561 [PMID: 36202013]
  11. J Appl Psychol. 2022 Sep;107(9):1441-1458 [PMID: 34591561]
  12. Soc Sci Med. 2014 Feb;102:26-32 [PMID: 24565138]
  13. AJOB Neurosci. 2015;6(3):3-14 [PMID: 26877887]
  14. Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Jan 30;8(1): [PMID: 32019104]
  15. Psychol Bull. 2020 Jan;146(1):30-90 [PMID: 31841013]
  16. J Interpers Violence. 2017 Sep;32(17):2591-2604 [PMID: 26141349]
  17. Curr Psychol. 2023 Jan 10;:1-11 [PMID: 36684464]
  18. Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 14;12:749315 [PMID: 34970188]
  19. Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Jul;2(7):458-468 [PMID: 31097815]
  20. Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Oct 11;10(10): [PMID: 36292436]
  21. Lancet Digit Health. 2020 May;2(5):e221-e223 [PMID: 33328054]
  22. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2016 Aug;42(8):1045-62 [PMID: 27229679]
  23. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2014 Sep;21(3):282-90 [PMID: 24913783]
  24. Affect Sci. 2022;3(1):118-134 [PMID: 35465047]
  25. Curr Psychol. 2022;41(12):8400-8409 [PMID: 35611237]
  26. BMC Nurs. 2021 Jul 7;20(1):124 [PMID: 34233674]
  27. Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 24;9(1):10774 [PMID: 31341206]
  28. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 03;17(17): [PMID: 32899134]
  29. Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 10;13:858291 [PMID: 36033064]

Grants

  1. FJ2022BF018/Fujian Social Science Planning Project under Grant

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0behaviorworldjustfairbeliefjusticesensitivityempathyrelationshipobserverscaleamongclinicalnursesstudymodelBeliefhealthenhancecurrenttheoryroleincludedSPSSusedmediationfairnessObservernurses'BACKGROUND:Explorationnursingstaffs'importantpromoteequityaccessservicesorganizationswellqualitycareorderdissectinfluencingfactorsaimsinvestigateinfluencesBasedempathy-altruismprotective-protectiveaimedprovidedeeperunderstandingeffectinvestigatingmediatingmoderatingMETHOD:cross-sectional571registeredfivehospitalsFuzhouconveniencesamplingmethodMeasurementsChinesetranslations220describedescriptivestatisticsvariables'PearsoncorrelationcoefficientPROCESSmacroModel414examinemoderationRESULT:resultsshowerpositivelycorrelatedone'sr = 026p < 0012mediatedexplains2083%3moderatedCONCLUSIONS:motivationsNursingadministratorsfocuscultivatingabilitiespositivequalitieshealthcaresettingnurses:moderated mediation modelof empathyEmpathyFairMediationModeration

Similar Articles

Cited By