The evolution of social behaviors and risk preferences in settings with uncertainty.

Guocheng Wang, Qi Su, Long Wang, Joshua B Plotkin
Author Information
  1. Guocheng Wang: Center for Systems and Control, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China. ORCID
  2. Qi Su: Department of Automation, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China. ORCID
  3. Long Wang: Center for Systems and Control, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China. ORCID
  4. Joshua B Plotkin: Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104. ORCID

Abstract

Humans update their social behavior in response to past experiences and changing environments. Behavioral decisions are further complicated by uncertainty in the outcome of social interactions. Faced with uncertainty, some individuals exhibit risk aversion while others seek risk. Attitudes toward risk may depend on socioeconomic status; and individuals may update their risk preferences over time, which will feedback on their social behavior. Here, we study how uncertainty and risk preferences shape the evolution of social behaviors. We extend the game-theoretic framework for behavioral evolution to incorporate uncertainty about payoffs and variation in how individuals respond to this uncertainty. We find that different attitudes toward risk can substantially alter behavior and long-term outcomes, as individuals seek to optimize their rewards from social interactions. In a standard setting without risk, for example, defection always overtakes a well-mixed population engaged in the classic Prisoner's Dilemma, whereas risk aversion can reverse the direction of evolution, promoting cooperation over defection. When individuals update their risk preferences along with their strategic behaviors, a population can oscillate between periods dominated by risk-averse cooperators and periods of risk-seeking defectors. Our analysis provides a systematic account of how risk preferences modulate, and even coevolve with, behavior in an uncertain social world.

Keywords

References

  1. Phys Rev Lett. 2018 Feb 2;120(5):058101 [PMID: 29481174]
  2. Phys Rev Lett. 2013 Dec 6;111(23):238101 [PMID: 24476306]
  3. Nature. 2008 Jul 10;454(7201):213-6 [PMID: 18615084]
  4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Mar 21;120(12):e2216218120 [PMID: 36927152]
  5. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jun 19;109(25):9929-34 [PMID: 22665767]
  6. J Theor Biol. 2006 Apr 21;239(4):435-44 [PMID: 16174521]
  7. Nat Commun. 2020 Feb 14;11(1):915 [PMID: 32060275]
  8. Phys Rev Lett. 2005 Dec 2;95(23):238701 [PMID: 16384353]
  9. Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Oct 7;273(1600):2565-70 [PMID: 16959650]
  10. Science. 2014 May 23;344(6186):862-7 [PMID: 24855262]
  11. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Aug 9;113(32):E4745-54 [PMID: 27450085]
  12. J Math Biol. 2021 Feb 3;82(3):14 [PMID: 33534054]
  13. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Nov 29;108(48):19193-8 [PMID: 22084103]
  14. Nature. 2006 May 25;441(7092):502-5 [PMID: 16724065]
  15. Evolution. 2006 Jun;60(6):1137-51 [PMID: 16892965]
  16. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2010 Oct;82(4 Pt 2):046106 [PMID: 21230344]
  17. Nature. 2017 Apr 13;544(7649):227-230 [PMID: 28355181]
  18. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jun 26;109(26):10409-13 [PMID: 22615375]
  19. J Theor Biol. 2009 Aug 7;259(3):570-81 [PMID: 19358858]
  20. PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9(12):e1003381 [PMID: 24339769]
  21. J Theor Biol. 2006 Nov 7;243(1):86-97 [PMID: 16860343]
  22. Nature. 2018 Jul;559(7713):246-249 [PMID: 29973718]
  23. Nature. 1998 Jun 11;393(6685):573-7 [PMID: 9634232]
  24. Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Jul;2(7):469-477 [PMID: 31097794]
  25. Nat Commun. 2018 May 31;9(1):2151 [PMID: 29855472]
  26. J Theor Biol. 2021 Oct 21;527:110818 [PMID: 34181968]
  27. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Dec 17;116(51):25398-25404 [PMID: 31772008]
  28. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Nov 22;113(47):E7518-E7525 [PMID: 27830651]
  29. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Dec 2;111(48):17093-8 [PMID: 25404308]

Grants

  1. 202306010132/China Scholarship Council (CSC)
  2. 23PJ1405500/Shanghai Pujiang Program
  3. 62036002/MOST | National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)
  4. 62281/John Templeton Foundation (JTF)

MeSH Term

Humans
Uncertainty
Social Behavior
Game Theory
Risk-Taking
Prisoner Dilemma
Cooperative Behavior

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0risksocialuncertaintyindividualspreferencesbehaviorevolutionupdatebehaviorscaninteractionsaversionseektowardmaydefectionpopulationcooperationperiodsHumansresponsepastexperienceschangingenvironmentsBehavioraldecisionscomplicatedoutcomeFacedexhibitothersAttitudesdependsocioeconomicstatustimewillfeedbackstudyshapeextendgame-theoreticframeworkbehavioralincorporatepayoffsvariationrespondfinddifferentattitudessubstantiallyalterlong-termoutcomesoptimizerewardsstandardsettingwithoutexamplealwaysovertakeswell-mixedengagedclassicPrisoner'sDilemmawhereasreversedirectionpromotingalongstrategicoscillatedominatedrisk-aversecooperatorsrisk-seekingdefectorsanalysisprovidessystematicaccountmodulateevencoevolveuncertainworldsettingsevolutionarygametheorypreference

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.