The relationship between the dietary index based Meiji nutritional profiling system for adults and lifestyle-related diseases: a predictive validity study from the National Institute for Longevity Sciences-Longitudinal Study of Aging.

Tao Yu, Shu Zhang, Ryota Wakayama, Tomohito Horimoto, Chikako Tange, Yukiko Nishita, Rei Otsuka
Author Information
  1. Tao Yu: R&D Division Meiji Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
  2. Shu Zhang: National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Aichi, Japan.
  3. Ryota Wakayama: R&D Division Meiji Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
  4. Tomohito Horimoto: R&D Division Meiji Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
  5. Chikako Tange: National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Aichi, Japan.
  6. Yukiko Nishita: National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Aichi, Japan.
  7. Rei Otsuka: National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Aichi, Japan.

Abstract

Background: Nutritional profiling system (NPS) holds promise as a public health tool for companies to measure product healthiness and for individuals in making healthier food choices. The Meiji NPS for adults specifically targets lifestyle-related diseases prevalent among Japan's adult population, including overweight/obesity, hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia. This study examined the cross-sectional association between the Meiji NPS for adults Dietary Index (MNfA-DI) and indicators of lifestyle-related diseases in a population.
Methods: The study comprised 1,272 middle-aged individuals (40-64 years, 50.1% male) who participated in the seventh wave (2010-2012) of the National Institute for Longevity Sciences-Longitudinal Study of Aging project, with no missing data on three-day dietary records. The MNfA-DI was computed at the individual diet level (accounting for the whole diet) using arithmetic energy-weighted means. A higher MNfA-DI indicated a greater nutritional quality of an individual's overall diet. Lifestyle-related disease indicators included body mass index (BMI, kg/m), body fat (%), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (mmHg), fasting plasma glucose (mg/dL), HbA1c (%), triglyceride levels (mg/dL), LDL, and HDL cholesterol levels (mg/dL). A multiple regression model was used to assess the association between the MNfA-DI and lifestyle-related disease indicators, adjusting for demographics, socioeconomic status, lifestyle factors, disease history, and energy intake as covariates, depending on the outcome.
Results: The median (interquartile range) age and MNfA-DI were 53.0 (46.0, 59.0) years and 10.1 (6.0, 14.0) points, respectively. MNfA-DI was negatively associated with body fat [partial regression coefficient (95% confidence interval) -0.04 (-0.07, -0.01)], diastolic blood pressure [-0.08 (-0.17, -0.002)], fasting plasma glucose [-0.18 (-0.33, -0.01)], and triglyceride [-1.36 (-2.16, -0.55)]. Additionally, MNfA-DI was also associated with almost indicators (except for LDL and HDL cholesterol) among participants with a BMI between 18.5 and 24.9 kg/m.
Conclusion: These findings suggest that the Meiji NPS for adults could be associated with a lower risk of lifestyle-related diseases. In addition, from a public health nutrition perspective, the Meiji NPS for adults may be useful to assess the food healthiness of the adult population.

Keywords

References

  1. BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 29;12(8):e058139 [PMID: 36038180]
  2. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2021 Jun;75(6):921-928 [PMID: 32661353]
  3. Prev Med. 2015 Dec;81:189-94 [PMID: 26348449]
  4. Hypertens Res. 2022 Oct;45(10):1575-1581 [PMID: 35859023]
  5. Am J Clin Nutr. 2024 Mar;119(3):756-768 [PMID: 38145705]
  6. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2019 Feb 1;26(2):170-182 [PMID: 29887537]
  7. Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1204-1222 [PMID: 33069326]
  8. Eur J Nutr. 2016 Jun;55(4):1515-24 [PMID: 26119583]
  9. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2024 Feb;37(1):203-216 [PMID: 37908110]
  10. Obes Rev. 2019 Nov;20 Suppl 2:107-115 [PMID: 31328385]
  11. Lancet. 2021 Sep 11;398(10304):957-980 [PMID: 34450083]
  12. Lancet. 2011 Jul 2;378(9785):31-40 [PMID: 21705069]
  13. Lancet. 2024 May 18;403(10440):2100-2132 [PMID: 38582094]
  14. J Epidemiol. 2010;20 Suppl 3:S544-8 [PMID: 20351476]
  15. BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Dec 14;4(6):e001882 [PMID: 31908864]
  16. Am J Prev Med. 2016 May;50(5):627-636 [PMID: 26699246]
  17. Am J Clin Nutr. 2024 Jan;119(1):145-163 [PMID: 37863430]
  18. BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 28;7(8):e015705 [PMID: 28851775]
  19. Front Nutr. 2023 Jan 13;9:1080858 [PMID: 36712540]
  20. Eur J Nutr. 2023 Jun;62(4):1719-1729 [PMID: 36808562]
  21. Eur J Nutr. 2017 Apr;56(3):1105-1122 [PMID: 26879847]
  22. J Nutr. 2014 Dec;144(12):2009-17 [PMID: 25411035]
  23. Obes Sci Pract. 2023 Sep 27;10(1):e714 [PMID: 38264004]
  24. Eur J Nutr. 2019 Aug;58(5):2037-2050 [PMID: 29951937]
  25. J Am Coll Nutr. 2009 Feb;28(1):22-9 [PMID: 19571156]
  26. Lancet. 2019 May 11;393(10184):1958-1972 [PMID: 30954305]
  27. Front Nutr. 2023 May 17;10:1149813 [PMID: 37266126]
  28. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Apr;91(4):1109S-1115S [PMID: 20164310]
  29. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2020 Jun 18;22(8):36 [PMID: 32556665]
  30. Front Nutr. 2023 Feb 02;10:1104617 [PMID: 36819696]
  31. J Epidemiol. 2000 Apr;10(1 Suppl):S1-9 [PMID: 10835822]
  32. Prev Med Rep. 2022 Jul 21;29:101919 [PMID: 35911572]
  33. Nat Food. 2021 Oct;2(10):809-818 [PMID: 37117986]
  34. Public Health Nutr. 2007 Apr;10(4):330-6 [PMID: 17362528]
  35. Adv Nutr. 2018 Nov 01;9(6):741-788 [PMID: 30462178]
  36. J Nutr. 1998 Feb;128(2 Suppl):444S-448S [PMID: 9478045]
  37. Adv Nutr. 2023 Nov;14(6):1499-1522 [PMID: 37659696]
  38. Am J Clin Nutr. 2018 Apr 1;107(4):647-651 [PMID: 29635504]
  39. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2021 May 6;31(5):1325-1338 [PMID: 33762150]
  40. Nutrients. 2018 Jul 30;10(8): [PMID: 30061492]
  41. Front Nutr. 2022 Jul 29;9:912148 [PMID: 35967784]
  42. Int J Cardiol. 2017 May 1;234:22-27 [PMID: 28258849]
  43. Nat Commun. 2022 Nov 22;13(1):7066 [PMID: 36414619]
  44. Front Nutr. 2022 Mar 04;9:853118 [PMID: 35308273]
  45. J Epidemiol. 2018;28 Suppl 3:S46-S52 [PMID: 29503386]
  46. Nutr Res Rev. 2012 Dec;25(2):207-22 [PMID: 22874455]
  47. Clin Chem. 1972 Jun;18(6):499-502 [PMID: 4337382]
  48. Lancet. 2016 Apr 2;387(10026):1377-1396 [PMID: 27115820]
  49. Eur J Nutr. 2020 Apr;59(3):1123-1134 [PMID: 31004183]
  50. J Intern Med. 2024 Apr;295(4):508-531 [PMID: 37867396]
  51. PLoS One. 2020 Jan 30;15(1):e0228318 [PMID: 31999772]
  52. BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2023 Dec;6(2):139-152 [PMID: 38264364]
  53. Nutrients. 2024 Mar 24;16(7): [PMID: 38612970]
  54. Nat Food. 2022 Sep;3(9):694-702 [PMID: 37118151]
  55. Front Nutr. 2021 Dec 23;8:774409 [PMID: 35004807]
  56. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2021 Aug;21(8):601-613 [PMID: 34212470]
  57. Nutr Rev. 2020 Dec 1;78(12 Suppl 2):18-26 [PMID: 33259625]
  58. J Nutr Sci. 2024 Feb 12;13:e8 [PMID: 38379590]
  59. J Nutr. 2023 Mar;153(3):798-810 [PMID: 36931752]
  60. Eat Weight Disord. 2022 Feb;27(1):85-100 [PMID: 33772731]
  61. Lancet. 2016 Apr 9;387(10027):1513-1530 [PMID: 27061677]
  62. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2023 Oct;77(10):998-1004 [PMID: 37400562]
  63. J Epidemiol. 2000 Apr;10(1 Suppl):S70-6 [PMID: 10835831]
  64. Front Nutr. 2022 Jul 14;9:897089 [PMID: 35967785]
  65. BMJ. 2018 Jun 13;361:k2392 [PMID: 29899124]
  66. Nutrients. 2023 Dec 14;15(24): [PMID: 38140372]
  67. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2014 Sep-Oct;8(5):e466-75 [PMID: 25263836]
  68. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2019 Apr;29(4):390-397 [PMID: 30782508]
  69. Lancet. 2017 Jan 7;389(10064):37-55 [PMID: 27863813]
  70. Am J Clin Nutr. 2017 Jul;106(1):225-232 [PMID: 28592599]
  71. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 24;19(11): [PMID: 35681960]
  72. Adv Nutr. 2014 Sep;5(5):534-6 [PMID: 25469385]
  73. Br J Nutr. 2014 Nov 28;112(10):1699-705 [PMID: 25277084]
  74. Br J Nutr. 2021 Apr 28;125(8):902-914 [PMID: 32878658]
  75. BMJ. 2020 Apr 1;369:m696 [PMID: 32238384]
  76. Proc Nutr Soc. 2017 Aug;76(3):255-264 [PMID: 28420455]
  77. J Hypertens. 2017 Feb;35(2):401-408 [PMID: 28005709]
  78. Adv Nutr. 2022 Dec 22;13(6):2620-2665 [PMID: 36041186]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0-0MNfA-DINPSMeijiadultslifestyle-related0diseasesindicatorsnutritional]profilingfoodpopulationstudydietdiseasebodymg/dLassociatedsystempublichealthproducthealthinessindividualsamongadultassociation1NationalInstituteLongevitySciences-LongitudinalStudyAgingdietaryqualityindexBMIfat%diastolicbloodpressurefastingplasmaglucosetriglyceridelevelsLDLHDLcholesterolregressionmodelassess01[-018healthyBackground:NutritionalholdspromisetoolcompaniesmeasuremakinghealthierchoicesspecificallytargetsprevalentJapan'sincludingoverweight/obesityhypertensiondiabetesdyslipidemiaexaminedcross-sectionalDietaryIndexMethods:comprised272middle-aged40-64 years501%maleparticipatedseventhwave2010-2012projectmissingdatathree-dayrecordscomputedindividuallevelaccountingwholeusingarithmeticenergy-weightedmeanshigherindicatedgreaterindividual'soverallLifestyle-relatedincludedmasskg/msystolicmmHgHbA1cmultipleusedadjustingdemographicssocioeconomicstatuslifestylefactorshistoryenergyintakecovariatesdependingoutcomeResults:medianinterquartilerangeage534659years10614pointsrespectivelynegatively[partialcoefficient95%confidenceinterval0407081700233[-136-21655Additionallyalsoalmostexceptparticipants5249 kg/mConclusion:findingssuggestlowerriskadditionnutritionperspectivemayusefulrelationshipbaseddiseases:predictivevaliditysocietynon-communicablenutrientprofilesreformulation

Similar Articles

Cited By