Do pilot zones for green finance reform and innovation avoid ESG greenwashing? Evidence from China.

Youxia Tong, Yeng Wai Lau, Siti Manisah Binti Ngalim
Author Information
  1. Youxia Tong: School of Economics and Management, Yancheng Institute of Technology, Yancheng, 224051, China.
  2. Yeng Wai Lau: School of Business and Economics, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, 43400, Selangor, Malaysia.
  3. Siti Manisah Binti Ngalim: School of Business and Economics, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, 43400, Selangor, Malaysia.

Abstract

As ESG investments have grown, many companies are emphasizing them to impress capital markets and consumers with their responsibility and environmental consciousness. However, managers in unethical companies greenwashing ESG reports to keep clients. The present investigation employs quasi-natural experiment data obtained from a sample of 1200 Chinese A-share listed companies spanning the period from 2011 to 2021 to examine how the Green Finance Reform and Innovation Pilot Zone (GFRIPZ) affects ESG greenwashing. GFRIPZ can prevent publicly traded companies from ESG greenwashing. The statistical analysis of heterogeneity demonstrates that GFRIPZ in non-state-owned, mid-west, heavy-polluting, manufacturing industries reduces ESG greenwashing. GFRIPZ suppresses corporate ESG greenwashing better in companies with severe financial constraints and a poor corporate reputation. GFRIPZ's inhibition of corporate ESG greenwashing is enhanced by internal and external monitoring. This study shows how financial markets affect firms' ESG greenwashing. It helps implement GFRIPZ theoretically. It also recommends raising listed companies' awareness of ESG disclosure and reducing corporate ESG greenwashing.

Keywords

References

  1. J Environ Manage. 2022 Dec 1;323:116178 [PMID: 36113291]
  2. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 14;19(22): [PMID: 36429698]
  3. Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 19;9:794195 [PMID: 34869197]
  4. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 13;19(22): [PMID: 36429642]
  5. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jan;30(5):12041-12058 [PMID: 36103065]
  6. PLoS One. 2023 Jan 18;18(1):e0279904 [PMID: 36652406]
  7. J Environ Manage. 2023 Aug 1;339:117915 [PMID: 37058925]
  8. J Environ Manage. 2023 Mar 15;330:117196 [PMID: 36621321]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0ESGgreenwashingGFRIPZcompaniescorporatemarketslistedGreenfinancialconstraintsreputationpilotfinancereforminnovationinvestmentsgrownmanyemphasizingimpresscapitalconsumersresponsibilityenvironmentalconsciousnessHowevermanagersunethicalreportskeepclientspresentinvestigationemploysquasi-naturalexperimentdataobtainedsample1200ChineseA-sharespanningperiod20112021examineFinanceReformInnovationPilotZoneaffectscanpreventpubliclytradedstatisticalanalysisheterogeneitydemonstratesnon-state-ownedmid-westheavy-pollutingmanufacturingindustriesreducessuppressesbetterseverepoorGFRIPZ'sinhibitionenhancedinternalexternalmonitoringstudyshowsaffectfirms'helpsimplementtheoreticallyalsorecommendsraisingcompanies'awarenessdisclosurereducingzonesgreenavoidgreenwashing?EvidenceChinaCorporateFinancialzoneMonitoring

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.