Positive impacts of green finance on environmental protection investment: Evidence from green finance reform and innovations pilot zone.

Zhao Cheng, Chengcheng Zhu
Author Information
  1. Zhao Cheng: School of Economics and Management, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, 100083, China.
  2. Chengcheng Zhu: School of Management Science & Real Eatate, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400044, China.

Abstract

After long-term development, the global economic level has improved significantly, but environmental issues generated by early extensive development seriously threaten the survival of human beings. China, in particular, urgently needs to promote sustainable development through green finance policies. For this reason, this paper regards the 2017 eight pilot zones in five provinces for green finance reform and innovations (GFRIs) as a quasi-natural experiment, and explores whether it can encourage investment in environmental protection in heavily polluting enterprises by using difference-in-differences-in-differences (DDD) model. The paper finds that: First, GFRIs can bolster investment in environmental protection in heavy polluting enterprises. The results remain consistent after several robustness checks, covering the placebo test, PSM-DID test and so on. Second, mechanism tests find that the policy promotes environmental protection investment by alleviating financing constraints and cutting financing costs. Third, heterogeneity analysis shows that the promotion effect of GFRIs on environmental protection investment is more pronounced for provinces with higher percentages of secondary industry GDP, large-scale enterprises, and enterprises with better ESG management. This paper demonstrates the beneficial influence of GFRIs on promoting the transformation of heavy polluting enterprises and provides suggestions for the improvement of such policies.

Keywords

References

  1. Heliyon. 2024 Jan 12;10(2):e24638 [PMID: 38298672]
  2. J Environ Econ Manage. 2020 Mar;100: [PMID: 32132762]
  3. J Environ Manage. 2023 Jan 15;326(Pt A):116681 [PMID: 36384056]
  4. Heliyon. 2023 May 15;9(5):e16301 [PMID: 37234625]
  5. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jun;30(26):68667-68676 [PMID: 37126176]
  6. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 May;30(21):60678-60693 [PMID: 37039919]
  7. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Aug;30(37):87628-87644 [PMID: 37428314]
  8. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jul;30(33):80573-80590 [PMID: 37301808]
  9. Heliyon. 2023 Sep 01;9(9):e19568 [PMID: 37809573]
  10. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jan;30(4):10527-10539 [PMID: 36085218]
  11. J Environ Manage. 2022 Oct 15;320:115833 [PMID: 35940011]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0environmentalprotectionfinanceinvestmententerprisesgreenGFRIsdevelopmentpaperpilotreforminnovationspollutingpoliciesprovincescanDDDmodelheavytestfinancingconstraintscostszoneFinancinglong-termglobaleconomiclevelimprovedsignificantlyissuesgeneratedearlyextensiveseriouslythreatensurvivalhumanbeingsChinaparticularurgentlyneedspromotesustainablereasonregards2017eightzonesfivequasi-naturalexperimentexploreswhetherencourageheavilyusingdifference-in-differences-in-differencesfindsthat:FirstbolsterresultsremainconsistentseveralrobustnesscheckscoveringplaceboPSM-DIDSecondmechanismtestsfindpolicypromotesalleviatingcuttingThirdheterogeneityanalysisshowspromotioneffectpronouncedhigherpercentagessecondaryindustryGDPlarge-scalebetterESGmanagementdemonstratesbeneficialinfluencepromotingtransformationprovidessuggestionsimprovementPositiveimpactsinvestment:EvidenceDifference-in-differences-in-differencesEnvironmentalGreen

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.