The impact of post-activation potentiation on explosive vertical jump after intermittent time: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Jiazhe Li, Kim Geok Soh, Su Peng Loh
Author Information
  1. Jiazhe Li: Department of Sports Studies, Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia. gs60376@student.upm.edu.my.
  2. Kim Geok Soh: Department of Sports Studies, Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia.
  3. Su Peng Loh: Department of Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia.

Abstract

The optimal intermittent time for post-activation potentiation (PAP) training remains uncertain and contentious. This study employed a meta-analysis to systematically evaluate the effect of different intermittent times on PAP in relation to explosive vertical jump height. Relevant literature was sourced from CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, CBM, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases using keywords such as "postactivation potentiation," "activation enhancement effect," "PAP," "explosive vertical jump," "explosive vertical high jump," and "intermittent time." The search covered publications from the inception of each database until June 2024. Studies involving athletes (regardless of sport type) undergoing PAP training were included, with no restrictions on the methods used to induce PAP. Comparative analysis focused on the heights of countermovement jumps (CMJ) and peak ground reaction force (GRF) before and after interventions. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, and data were analyzed using RevMan5.3. The study included a total of 21 papers with 327 subjects, primarily using the squat as the method of PAP induction. The meta-analysis revealed that intermittent times of 4 min [MD = - 0.03, 95% CI: - 0.04 ~ - 0.01; Z = 2.71, P = 0.007] and 5-8 min [MD = - 0.03, 95% CI: - 0.04 ~ - 0.01; Z = 3.07, P = 0.002] significantly increased the height of explosive vertical CMJs. However, intermittent times of 1-3 min [MD = -0.00, 95% CI: - 0.01 ~ 0.01; Z = 0.38, P = 0.70] and 10-24 min [MD = - 0.01, 95% CI: - 0.02 ~ 0.00; Z = 1.43, P = 0.15] did not show significant effects on CMJ height. These findings indicate that 4-min and 5-8 min intervals significantly enhance CMJ height, while intervals shorter than 4 min or longer than 8 min do not have a significant impact.

Keywords

References

  1. Int J Exerc Sci. 2014 Jul 1;7(3):212-219 [PMID: 27182405]
  2. Life (Basel). 2023 Jan 09;13(1): [PMID: 36676138]
  3. J Strength Cond Res. 2014 Jun;28(6):1529-37 [PMID: 24343325]
  4. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2005 Feb;98(2):429-36 [PMID: 15475602]
  5. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2008 Oct;104(3):463-72 [PMID: 18563434]
  6. J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Dec;26(12):3320-5 [PMID: 23007485]
  7. J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Jul;33(7):2009-2018 [PMID: 30138241]
  8. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 13;19(4): [PMID: 35206269]
  9. Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 24;11:467 [PMID: 32265789]
  10. J Sports Sci. 2020 Jul;38(14):1615-1623 [PMID: 32316854]
  11. J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Sep;25(9):2496-502 [PMID: 21747294]
  12. J Sports Sci. 2008 Jun;26(8):795-802 [PMID: 18569545]
  13. J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Mar;31(3):660-666 [PMID: 26670990]
  14. Sports Med. 2016 Feb;46(2):231-40 [PMID: 26508319]
  15. J Strength Cond Res. 2014 Aug;28(8):2236-43 [PMID: 24513618]
  16. PLoS One. 2019 Sep 12;14(9):e0222466 [PMID: 31513671]
  17. J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Dec;25(12):3319-25 [PMID: 22076086]
  18. J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Nov;27(11):2997-3000 [PMID: 23442291]
  19. J Sports Sci Med. 2024 Mar 01;23(1):156-176 [PMID: 38455430]
  20. Sports (Basel). 2016 Mar 23;4(2): [PMID: 29910270]
  21. J Sports Sci. 2017 Jul;35(14):1442-1450 [PMID: 27483990]
  22. J Hum Kinet. 2017 Jun 22;57:29-38 [PMID: 28713456]
  23. Muscle Nerve. 2015 Aug;52(2):252-9 [PMID: 25504211]
  24. Exp Brain Res. 1996 Mar;108(3):450-62 [PMID: 8801125]
  25. Exp Neurol. 1983 Jul;81(1):141-52 [PMID: 6861942]
  26. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2023 May 04;8(2): [PMID: 37218850]
  27. Neurosci Lett. 2023 Mar 28;801:137132 [PMID: 36801240]
  28. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2014 May;26(2):187-94 [PMID: 24225048]
  29. Sports Med. 2009;39(2):147-66 [PMID: 19203135]
  30. J Strength Cond Res. 2020 Jun;34(6):1600-1608 [PMID: 29373430]
  31. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2020 Apr;45(4):349-356 [PMID: 31557447]
  32. J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Jan;27(1):107-15 [PMID: 22395265]
  33. Eur J Sport Sci. 2018 Jun;18(5):595-610 [PMID: 29490594]
  34. Am J Physiol. 1982 Mar;242(3):C234-41 [PMID: 7065172]
  35. Int J Biostat. 2023 Mar 27;20(1):169-199 [PMID: 36961993]
  36. Sports Biomech. 2022 Feb 4;:1-18 [PMID: 35119345]
  37. Clin Neurophysiol. 2010 Jun;121(6):957-61 [PMID: 20153248]
  38. J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Jan;31(1):196-206 [PMID: 27172267]
  39. J Strength Cond Res. 2021 May 1;35(5):1357-1363 [PMID: 30507733]
  40. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994 Mar;149(3 Pt 1):739-43 [PMID: 8118645]
  41. J Hum Kinet. 2016 Sep 10;52:95-106 [PMID: 28149397]
  42. Exp Physiol. 2021 Dec;106(12):2489-2501 [PMID: 34569107]
  43. J Strength Cond Res. 2014 Jan;28(1):232-9 [PMID: 23591951]
  44. J Strength Cond Res. 2008 May;22(3):726-30 [PMID: 18438248]
  45. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2024 Apr 23;: [PMID: 38652270]
  46. Biol Lett. 2020 Jun;16(6):20200255 [PMID: 32516563]
  47. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2024 May;124(5):1561-1574 [PMID: 38159138]
  48. J Sports Sci. 2019 Feb;37(4):443-451 [PMID: 30070620]
  49. J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Feb;29(2):336-42 [PMID: 25330084]
  50. J Hum Kinet. 2019 Oct 18;69:271-281 [PMID: 31666909]
  51. J Strength Cond Res. 2010 May;24(5):1285-91 [PMID: 20393352]
  52. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2021 Mar 15;2021:5585605 [PMID: 33815552]
  53. Sports (Basel). 2016 May 06;4(2): [PMID: 29910275]
  54. J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Jun;25(6):1486-91 [PMID: 21293305]
  55. Nutrients. 2018 Nov 02;10(11): [PMID: 30400221]
  56. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2019 Dec;59(12):1956-1962 [PMID: 31933341]
  57. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2019 Jun;59(6):916-924 [PMID: 30264975]
  58. J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Sep;24(9):2285-9 [PMID: 20683353]
  59. J Strength Cond Res. 2023 Oct 1;37(10):2052-2057 [PMID: 37639644]
  60. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2019 Dec;70:115-122 [PMID: 31476603]
  61. J Strength Cond Res. 2003 May;17(2):342-4 [PMID: 12741875]
  62. J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Nov;31(11):3010-3017 [PMID: 29065077]
  63. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2018 Oct;58(10):1375-1382 [PMID: 28597614]
  64. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 14;17(14): [PMID: 32674351]
  65. Sports Med. 2005;35(7):585-95 [PMID: 16026172]
  66. J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Aug;23(5):1465-9 [PMID: 19593219]
  67. J Strength Cond Res. 2003 May;17(2):345-9 [PMID: 12741876]
  68. Muscle Nerve. 2012 Jan;45(1):110-5 [PMID: 22190316]
  69. J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Sep;29(9):2579-85 [PMID: 25719916]

MeSH Term

Humans
Athletic Performance
Athletes
Muscle Strength
Time Factors

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0vertical"intermittentPAPjump- 0potentiationheightusing95%CI:01P = 0timemeta-analysistimesexplosiveincludedCMJpost-activationtrainingstudyeffect"explosivejumps4 min[MD = - 0035-8 minsignificantly00significantintervalsimpactoptimalremainsuncertaincontentiousemployedsystematicallyevaluatedifferentrelationRelevantliteraturesourcedCNKIWanfangVIPCBMPubMedWebScienceGoogleScholardatabaseskeywords"postactivation"activationenhancement"PAPhigh"intermittentsearchcoveredpublicationsinceptiondatabaseJune2024StudiesinvolvingathletesregardlesssporttypeundergoingrestrictionsmethodsusedinduceComparativeanalysisfocusedheightscountermovementpeakgroundreactionforceGRFinterventionsqualitystudiesassessedCochraneRiskBiasTooldataanalyzedRevMan53total21papers327subjectsprimarilysquatmethodinductionrevealed04 ~ - 0Z = 271007]04 ~ -0Z = 307002]increasedCMJsHowever1-3 min[MD = -001 ~ 0Z = 03870]10-24 min[MD =02 ~ 0Z = 14315]showeffectsfindingsindicate4-minenhanceshorterlonger8 mintime:systematicreviewCountermovementExplosiveIntermittentMeta-analysisPost-activation

Similar Articles

Cited By