Family Climate as a Mediator of the Relationship between Stress and Life Satisfaction: A Study with Young University Students.

Paula Morales Almeida, Cristina Nunes
Author Information
  1. Paula Morales Almeida: Department of Psychology, Sociology and Social Work, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35001 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain. ORCID
  2. Cristina Nunes: Research Center of Psychology (CIP), Universidade do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The family environment has a significant influence on the personality development of young people and their assessment of life satisfaction. Perceived stress is related to life satisfaction, but this relationship is also influenced by the family context. The present study analysed the impact of perceived stress on life satisfaction and the mediating role of family climate in university students.
METHODS: A sample of 920 university students was recruited for this study. The instruments used included the Perceived Stress Scale, the Satisfaction with Life Scale, and the Family Social Climate Scale, and socioeducational information was collected.
RESULTS: The results indicate that perceived stress had a significant and positive effect on both conflictive and violent family climates, while life satisfaction was negatively impacted by these negative family climates. Additionally, supportive and cohesive family climates, along with difficulty expressing feelings and opinions, were found to have significant positive effects on life satisfaction.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the importance of the family system in shaping individual conditions and how it can regulate the relationship between stress and life satisfaction.

Keywords

References

  1. J Affect Disord. 2015 Mar 1;173:90-6 [PMID: 25462401]
  2. J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96 [PMID: 6668417]
  3. J Pers Assess. 1985 Feb;49(1):71-5 [PMID: 16367493]
  4. SSM Popul Health. 2021 May 04;14:100804 [PMID: 34027009]
  5. Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 15;13:978499 [PMID: 36046407]
  6. J Child Fam Stud. 2022;31(4):1007-1018 [PMID: 34720565]
  7. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91 [PMID: 17695343]
  8. J Fam Psychol. 2014 Apr;28(2):225-35 [PMID: 24588603]
  9. Fam Relat. 2021 Dec;70(5):1358-1368 [PMID: 34548727]
  10. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2020 Mar 04;13:223-232 [PMID: 32184683]
  11. Health Psychol Rep. 2020 Dec 26;9(2):149-159 [PMID: 38084284]
  12. Chongsonyonhak Yongu. 2016 Oct;23(10):29-47 [PMID: 27996059]
  13. BMC Womens Health. 2022 Dec 5;22(1):493 [PMID: 36471359]
  14. J Youth Adolesc. 2011 Jul;40(7):889-901 [PMID: 21042841]
  15. PLoS One. 2015 Dec 02;10(12):e0143612 [PMID: 26629694]
  16. Brux Med. 1976 May;56(5):205-10 [PMID: 1009491]
  17. Span J Psychol. 2006 May;9(1):86-93 [PMID: 16673626]
  18. J Marriage Fam. 2010 Jun;72(3):685-704 [PMID: 20676350]
  19. J Fam Psychol. 2010 Apr;24(2):105-14 [PMID: 20438185]
  20. Psychol Bull. 2002 Mar;128(2):330-66 [PMID: 11931522]
  21. Psychol Sci. 2017 Nov;28(11):1547-1562 [PMID: 28902575]

Grants

  1. project CIP - UIDB/PSI/04345/2020/FCT - Funda����o para a Ci��ncia e a Tecnologia

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0familylifesatisfactionstresssignificantperceivedScaleclimatesPerceivedrelationshipstudyclimateuniversitystudentsStressLifeFamilyClimatepositiveBACKGROUND:environmentinfluencepersonalitydevelopmentyoungpeopleassessmentrelatedalsoinfluencedcontextpresentanalysedimpactmediatingroleMETHODS:sample920recruitedinstrumentsusedincludedSatisfactionSocialsocioeducationalinformationcollectedRESULTS:resultsindicateeffectconflictiveviolentnegativelyimpactednegativeAdditionallysupportivecohesivealongdifficultyexpressingfeelingsopinionsfoundeffectsCONCLUSIONS:findingshighlightimportancesystemshapingindividualconditionscanregulateMediatorRelationshipSatisfaction:StudyYoungUniversityStudentscollegestudentmediation

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.