Rotational femoral osteotomies and cam resection improve hip function and internal rotation for patients with anterior hip impingement and decreased femoral version.

Till D Lerch, Malin K Meier, Markus S Hanke, Adam Boschung, Florian Schmaranzer, Klaus A Siebenrock, Moritz Tannast, Simon D Steppacher
Author Information
  1. Till D Lerch: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 10, Bern 3010, Switzerland. ORCID
  2. Malin K Meier: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 10, Bern 3010, Switzerland.
  3. Markus S Hanke: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 10, Bern 3010, Switzerland.
  4. Adam Boschung: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 10, Bern 3010, Switzerland.
  5. Florian Schmaranzer: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 10, Bern 3010, Switzerland. ORCID
  6. Klaus A Siebenrock: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 10, Bern 3010, Switzerland.
  7. Moritz Tannast: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 10, Bern 3010, Switzerland.
  8. Simon D Steppacher: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 10, Bern 3010, Switzerland.

Abstract

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) patients with reduced femoral version (FV) are poorly understood. The aim of this study is to assess (i) hip pain and range of motion, (ii) subjective satisfaction and (iii) subsequent surgeries of symptomatic patients who underwent rotational femoral osteotomies. A retrospective case series involving 18 patients (23 hips, 2014-2018) with anterior hip pain that underwent rotational femoral osteotomies for treatment of decreased FV was performed. The mean preoperative age was 25 ± 6 years (57% male), and all patients had decreased FV < 10° and minimum 1-year follow-up (mean follow-up 2 ± 1 years). Surgical indication was the positive anterior impingement test, limited internal rotation (IR) in 90° of flexion (mean 10 ± 8°) and IR in extension (mean 24 ± 11°), anterosuperior chondrolabral damage in Magnet resonance (MR) arthrography, CT-based measurement of decreased FV (mean 5 ± 3°, Murphy method) and no osteoarthritis (Tönnis Grade 0). Most patients had intra- and extra-articular subspine FAI (patient-specific 3D impingement simulation). Subtrochanteric rotational femoral osteotomies to increase FV (correction 20 ± 4°) were combined with cam resection (78%) and surgical hip dislocation (91%). (i) The positive anterior impingement test decreased significantly ( < 0.001) from pre- to postoperatively (100% to 9%). IR in 90° of flexion increased significantly ( < 0.001, 10 ± 8° to 31 ± 10°). (ii) Subjective satisfaction increased significantly ( < 0.001) from pre- to postoperatively (33% 77%). The mean Merle d'Aubigné and Postel score increased significantly ( < 0.001) from 14 ± 2 (8-15) points to 17 ± 1 (13-18,  < 0.001) points. Most patients (85%) reported at follow-up that they would undergo surgery again. (iii) At follow-up, all 23 hips were preserved (no conversion to total hip arthroplasty). One hip (4%) underwent revision osteosynthesis. Proximal rotational femoral osteotomies combined with cam resection improve hip pain and IR in most FAI patients with decreased FV at short-term follow-up. Rotational femoral osteotomies to increase FV are safe and effective.

References

  1. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2015 Sep;24(5):425-32 [PMID: 25794115]
  2. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Apr 1;97(7):537-43 [PMID: 25834077]
  3. Comput Aided Surg. 2010;15(4-6):75-82 [PMID: 21067316]
  4. J Pediatr Orthop. 1991 Jul-Aug;11(4):419-31 [PMID: 1860937]
  5. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2006 Winter;18(4):262-5 [PMID: 17108799]
  6. Orthopedics. 1978 Jul-Aug;1(4):299-306 [PMID: 733194]
  7. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Oct;475(10):2538-2545 [PMID: 28688017]
  8. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Dec;(417):112-20 [PMID: 14646708]
  9. Hip Int. 2021 Nov;31(6):797-803 [PMID: 32750252]
  10. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 Dec;81(12):1747-70 [PMID: 10608388]
  11. J Orthop Res. 2007 Jan;25(1):122-31 [PMID: 17054112]
  12. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Jul;460:152-8 [PMID: 17290151]
  13. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002 May;84(4):556-60 [PMID: 12043778]
  14. Br J Sports Med. 2016 Oct;50(19):1169-76 [PMID: 27629403]
  15. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2015 Feb 18;2(1):65-79 [PMID: 27011816]
  16. J Orthop Res. 2008 Sep;26(9):1199-205 [PMID: 18404737]
  17. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Jun;188(6):1540-52 [PMID: 17515374]
  18. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Jan 20;98(2):127-34 [PMID: 26791033]
  19. Am J Sports Med. 2019 Nov;47(13):3120-3132 [PMID: 31539275]
  20. Am J Sports Med. 2018 Jan;46(1):122-134 [PMID: 28937786]
  21. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Aug;470(8):2220-6 [PMID: 22528378]
  22. Comput Biol Med. 2011 May;41(5):285-91 [PMID: 21463859]
  23. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2017 Nov;21(5):487-506 [PMID: 29025180]
  24. Arthroscopy. 2012 Jul;28(7):965-71 [PMID: 22305298]
  25. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1954 Jun;36-A(3):451-75 [PMID: 13163078]
  26. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008 Feb;38(2):71-7 [PMID: 18560194]
  27. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Dec;(417):27-40 [PMID: 14646700]
  28. Arthroscopy. 2021 Jan;37(1):111-123 [PMID: 32828933]
  29. Arthroscopy. 2015 Jan;31(1):35-41 [PMID: 25217206]
  30. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985 Oct;67(8):1229-35 [PMID: 4055848]
  31. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986 Sep;68(7):1000-7 [PMID: 3745237]
  32. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987 Oct;69(8):1169-76 [PMID: 3667647]
  33. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2022 Jul 22;9(3):191-196 [PMID: 35992026]
  34. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Dec;471(12):3774-80 [PMID: 23463288]
  35. Physiother Res Int. 2000;5(4):241-8 [PMID: 11129666]
  36. Acta Orthop Belg. 2009 Aug;75(4):490-6 [PMID: 19774816]
  37. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2021 Apr 12;7(4):755-763 [PMID: 34377518]
  38. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018 Oct 1;26(19):e416-e425 [PMID: 30106763]
  39. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997 Mar;79(2):230-4 [PMID: 9119848]
  40. Orthopedics. 2013 Mar;36(3):e293-300 [PMID: 23464948]
  41. Clin Rehabil. 2005 Sep;19(6):659-61 [PMID: 16180602]
  42. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013 Jan;133(1):69-79 [PMID: 23064993]
  43. Hip Int. 2022 Mar;32(2):253-264 [PMID: 32866044]
  44. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014 Jul;22(7):951-8 [PMID: 24857978]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0femoralhippatientsFVosteotomiesmeanimpingementdecreasedfollow-up< 0001rotationalanteriorIRsignificantlyFAIpainunderwentresectionincreasedversioniisatisfactioniii23hipspositivetestrotation90°flexion10 ± 8°increasecombinedcampre-postoperativelypointsimproveRotationalFemoroacetabularreducedpoorlyunderstoodaimstudyassessrangemotionsubjectivesubsequentsurgeriessymptomaticretrospectivecaseseriesinvolving182014-2018treatmentperformedpreoperativeage25 ± 6 years57%maleFV < 10°minimum1-year2 ± 1 yearsSurgicalindicationlimitedinternalextension24 ± 11°anterosuperiorchondrolabraldamageMagnetresonanceMRarthrographyCT-basedmeasurement5 ± 3°MurphymethodosteoarthritisTönnisGrade0intra-extra-articularsubspinepatient-specific3DsimulationSubtrochantericcorrection20 ± 4°78%surgicaldislocation91%100%9%31 ± 10°Subjective33%77%Merled'AubignéPostelscore14 ± 28-1517 ± 113-1885%reportedundergosurgerypreservedconversiontotalarthroplastyOne4%revisionosteosynthesisProximalshort-termsafeeffectiveand camfunctionand internalfor patientsand decreased

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.