Do educational interventions reduce the gender gap in communication skills?- a systematic review.

Alexis M Driscoll, Rohan Suresh, George Popa, Leif Berglund, Amanda Azer, Helen Hed, Yajie Duan, Alice Chu, Aleksandra McGrath
Author Information
  1. Alexis M Driscoll: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, 07103, USA.
  2. Rohan Suresh: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, 07103, USA.
  3. George Popa: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, 07103, USA.
  4. Leif Berglund: Department of Clinical Sciences, Ume�� university, Ume��, Sweden.
  5. Amanda Azer: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, 07103, USA.
  6. Helen Hed: Ume�� University Library, Ume��, Sweden.
  7. Yajie Duan: Department of Statistics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA.
  8. Alice Chu: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, 07103, USA.
  9. Aleksandra McGrath: Department of Clinical Sciences, Ume�� university, Ume��, Sweden. aleksandra.mcgrath@umu.se.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Efficient doctor-patient communication is essential for improving patient care. The impact of educational interventions on the communication skills of male and female students has not been systematically reviewed. The aim of this review is to identify interventions used to improve communication skills in medical curricula and investigate their effectiveness in improving the communication skills of male and female medical students.
METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted using the PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria were as follows: used intervention strategies aiming to improve communication skills, participants were medical students, and studies were primary research studies, systematic reviews, or meta-analyses.
RESULTS: 2913 articles were identified based on search terms. After title, abstract, and full-text review, 58 studies were included with interventions consisting of Training or Drama Courses, Curriculum-Integrated, patient Learning Courses, and Community-Based Learning Courses. 69% of articles reported improved communication skills for both genders equally, 28% for women more than men, and 3% for men more than women. 16 of the 58 articles reported numerical data regarding communication skills pre-and post-intervention. Analysis revealed that post-intervention scores are significantly greater than pre-intervention scores for both male (p���<���0.001) and female students (p���<���0.001). While the post-test scores of male students were significantly lower than that of female students (p���=���0.01), there is no significant difference between genders for the benefits, or difference between post-intervention and pre-intervention scores (p���=���0.15), suggesting that both genders benefited equally.
CONCLUSION: Implementation of communication training into medical education leads to improvement in communication skills of medical students, irrespective of gender. No specific interventions benefitting male students have been identified from published literature, suggesting need of further studies to explore the phenomenon of gender gap in communication skills and how to minimize the differences between male and female students.

Keywords

References

  1. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2016 Dec;18(6):571-579 [PMID: 27063685]
  2. Med Sci Educ. 2021 May 11;31(4):1291-1304 [PMID: 33996247]
  3. JAMA Surg. 2022 Feb 1;157(2):146-156 [PMID: 34878511]
  4. Med Educ. 1991 Mar;25(2):127-34 [PMID: 2023554]
  5. Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Jul;105(7):2256-2263 [PMID: 34756637]
  6. Med Teach. 1999;21(6):563-70 [PMID: 21281175]
  7. Med Humanit. 2007 Dec;33(2):75-80 [PMID: 23674426]
  8. BMC Med Educ. 2009 Jun 05;9:28 [PMID: 19500358]
  9. Med Teach. 2001 Mar;23(2):164-170 [PMID: 11371293]
  10. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 8;2:CD012418 [PMID: 33559127]
  11. Med Teach. 2016 Dec;38(12):1229-1235 [PMID: 27573531]
  12. BMC Med Educ. 2020 Feb 24;20(1):58 [PMID: 32093709]
  13. Rev Med Chil. 2002 Apr;130(4):437-45 [PMID: 12090111]
  14. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2010 Nov;23(3):466 [PMID: 21290365]
  15. Front Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 20;11:221 [PMID: 32265762]
  16. J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2021 Jan;9(1):18-25 [PMID: 33521137]
  17. Patient Educ Couns. 2004 Jul;54(1):119-21 [PMID: 15210269]
  18. Med Educ. 2015 Mar;49(3):321-31 [PMID: 25693991]
  19. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2010 Sep;39(9):686-6 [PMID: 20957303]
  20. Porto Biomed J. 2016 Nov-Dec;1(5):173-180 [PMID: 32258571]
  21. Med Educ. 2000 Feb;34(2):90-4 [PMID: 10652060]
  22. BMJ. 2001 Oct 20;323(7318):908-11 [PMID: 11668137]
  23. Med Teach. 2014 Apr;36 Suppl 1:S24-9 [PMID: 24617780]
  24. GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2011;28(4):Doc54 [PMID: 22205912]
  25. BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71 [PMID: 33782057]
  26. BMC Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;11:41 [PMID: 21708000]
  27. Front Psychol. 2017 Nov 21;8:2018 [PMID: 29209252]
  28. Psychooncology. 2010 Sep;19(9):975-81 [PMID: 19918865]
  29. BMC Med Educ. 2014 Jul 05;14:135 [PMID: 24996804]
  30. Med Teach. 2022 Sep;44(9):997-1006 [PMID: 35653622]
  31. Rev Med Suisse. 2017 Feb 8;13(549):353-356 [PMID: 28708355]
  32. Korean J Med Educ. 2014 Sep;26(3):179-87 [PMID: 25805260]
  33. Acad Med. 2017 Jan;92(1):70-75 [PMID: 27532867]
  34. Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Jan;70(1):3-9 [PMID: 18037602]
  35. Med Educ Online. 2020 Dec;25(1):1742965 [PMID: 32197574]
  36. J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Jul;31(7):755-61 [PMID: 26921153]
  37. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2015 Mar;20(1):45-57 [PMID: 24752653]
  38. BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 23;8(1):e019224 [PMID: 29362266]
  39. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2013 Feb;13(1):100-6 [PMID: 23573389]
  40. Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Sep;58(3):271-8 [PMID: 16061342]
  41. Med Teach. 2013;35(2):e946-51 [PMID: 22938688]
  42. Australas Med J. 2015 Oct 31;8(10):325-32 [PMID: 26576204]
  43. Indian J Community Med. 2021 Apr-Jun;46(2):247-251 [PMID: 34321735]
  44. Acad Med. 2004 Jun;79(6):495-507 [PMID: 15165967]
  45. J Educ Health Promot. 2018 Feb 09;7:30 [PMID: 29629391]
  46. Int J Med Educ. 2021 Oct 29;12:205-218 [PMID: 34716989]
  47. Acad Med. 2011 Nov;86(11):1437-42 [PMID: 21952062]
  48. BMC Med Educ. 2020 Jan 15;20(1):15 [PMID: 31941466]
  49. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Dec;140:22-32 [PMID: 34437948]
  50. PeerJ. 2019 Oct 24;7:e7896 [PMID: 31660273]
  51. Med Teach. 2014 Mar;36(3):251-9 [PMID: 24499052]
  52. Med Educ. 2007 Jul;41(7):684-9 [PMID: 17614889]
  53. BMC Med Educ. 2020 Jul 9;20(1):215 [PMID: 32646405]
  54. Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Oct;99(10):1670-5 [PMID: 27134051]
  55. Patient Educ Couns. 2011 May;83(2):152-7 [PMID: 21459253]
  56. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2006 Mar;19(1):96-105 [PMID: 16531306]
  57. Acad Psychiatry. 2001 Dec;25(4):193-200 [PMID: 11744535]
  58. Int J Med Educ. 2021 Nov 26;12:233-242 [PMID: 34842177]
  59. Med Educ. 2008 Mar;42(3):256-65 [PMID: 18221268]
  60. BMC Med Educ. 2014 Apr 01;14:64 [PMID: 24685070]
  61. Int J Med Educ. 2020 Feb 14;11:37-46 [PMID: 32061170]
  62. BMC Med Educ. 2022 Feb 7;22(1):82 [PMID: 35130891]
  63. J Grad Med Educ. 2011 Jun;3(2):121-4 [PMID: 22655130]
  64. Med Teach. 2008;30(3):322-4 [PMID: 18509879]
  65. Lancet. 2019 Feb 9;393(10171):570-578 [PMID: 30739692]
  66. BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898 [PMID: 31462531]
  67. Med Teach. 2007 Sep;29(6):e204-8 [PMID: 17922360]
  68. Acad Med. 2018 Apr;93(4):648-656 [PMID: 29116981]
  69. Med Teach. 2010;32(4):e191-8 [PMID: 20353319]
  70. Clin Teach. 2021 Jun;18(3):301-306 [PMID: 33684963]
  71. Med Teach. 2011;33(12):e663-9 [PMID: 22225448]
  72. Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Aug;101(8):1439-1451 [PMID: 29501215]
  73. J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Dec;20(12):1108-13 [PMID: 16423099]
  74. Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Sep;76(3):356-60 [PMID: 19647968]
  75. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2013 Mar;18(1):129-31 [PMID: 23108689]
  76. Korean J Med Educ. 2017 Mar;29(1):33-39 [PMID: 28264552]
  77. BMC Res Notes. 2012 Sep 05;5:486 [PMID: 22947372]
  78. Med Teach. 2018 Aug;40(8):813-819 [PMID: 30106597]
  79. BMC Med Educ. 2007 Oct 10;7:35 [PMID: 17925041]
  80. Med Educ. 2010 Jul;44(7):662-73 [PMID: 20636585]
  81. Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Jun;98(6):753-61 [PMID: 25817424]
  82. Med Educ. 2009 Sep;43(9):847-53 [PMID: 19709009]
  83. BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 19;10(7):e035690 [PMID: 32690511]
  84. World J Methodol. 2021 Jul 20;11(4):116-129 [PMID: 34322364]
  85. Ulster Med J. 2017 Sep;86(3):198-200 [PMID: 29581634]
  86. Med Educ. 1999 Jan;33(1):14-8 [PMID: 10211271]
  87. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12:CD003267 [PMID: 23235595]
  88. Front Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 13;12:624005 [PMID: 33927651]

MeSH Term

Humans
Communication
Female
Male
Physician-Patient Relations
Students, Medical
Curriculum
Sex Factors
Clinical Competence
Education, Medical
Education, Medical, Undergraduate

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0communicationstudentsskillsmaleinterventionsfemalemedicalreviewstudiesscoressystematicarticlesCoursesgenderspost-interventiongenderimprovingeducationalusedimproveliteratureidentified58Learningreportedequallywomenmensignificantlypre-interventionp���<���0001p���=���0differencesuggestingtrainingeducationgapCommunicationMedicalBACKGROUND:Efficientdoctor-patientessentialpatientcareimpactsystematicallyreviewedaimidentifycurriculainvestigateeffectivenessMETHODS:conductedusingPRISMAguidelinesInclusioncriteriafollows:interventionstrategiesaimingparticipantsprimaryresearchreviewsmeta-analysesRESULTS:2913basedsearchtermstitleabstractfull-textincludedconsistingTrainingDramaCurriculum-IntegratedPatientCommunity-Based69%improved28%3%16numericaldataregardingpre-andAnalysisrevealedgreaterpost-testlower01significantbenefits15benefitedCONCLUSION:Implementationleadsimprovementirrespectivespecificbenefittingpublishedneedexplorephenomenonminimizedifferencesreduceskills?-Gender

Similar Articles

Cited By