Human brain organoid code of conduct.

Meagan Hoppe, Ahmed Habib, Riya Desai, Lincoln Edwards, Chowdari Kodavali, Natalie Sandel Sherry Psy, Pascal O Zinn
Author Information
  1. Meagan Hoppe: UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
  2. Ahmed Habib: UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
  3. Riya Desai: UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
  4. Lincoln Edwards: UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
  5. Chowdari Kodavali: UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
  6. Natalie Sandel Sherry Psy: Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
  7. Pascal O Zinn: UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.

Abstract

Human brain organoids are models derived from human embryonic or induced pluripotent stem cells that mimic basic cerebral microanatomy and demonstrate simple functional neuronal networks. Brain organoids have been a rapidly expanding avenue for biomedical research in general and specifically: neural development, regeneration, and central nervous system pathophysiology. However, technology replicating functional aspects of the human brain, including electrically active neural networks, requires a responsible code of conduct. In this review, we focus the discussion on intrinsic and extrinsic ethical factors associated with organoids: intrinsic considerations arise with the growing complexity of human brain organoids, including human-animal chimerism, consciousness development, and questions of where these human-like beings fall in a moral hierarchy. Extrinsic considerations explore ethics on obtainment, manufacturing, and production of sophisticated human products. In summary, a thoughtful code of conduct using human brain organoids towards the advancement of science and medicine is crucial. This article shall facilitate a structured thought process approaching the moral landscape of organoid technology.

Keywords

References

  1. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020 Dec 10;8:602646 [PMID: 33363131]
  2. SLAS Discov. 2018 Sep;23(8):862-868 [PMID: 29543559]
  3. Brain. 2017 Mar 1;140(3):692-706 [PMID: 28115364]
  4. PLoS Biol. 2008 Aug 19;6(8):e202 [PMID: 18715117]
  5. Cell Stem Cell. 2019 Mar 7;24(3):487-497.e7 [PMID: 30799279]
  6. Nat Biotechnol. 2019 Apr;37(4):436-444 [PMID: 30936566]
  7. Science. 1890 Aug 8;16(392):78-9 [PMID: 17751980]
  8. Nature. 2019 Apr;568(7752):299-302 [PMID: 30996311]
  9. iScience. 2019 Apr 26;14:301-311 [PMID: 31006610]
  10. Cell Stem Cell. 2019 Oct 3;25(4):558-569.e7 [PMID: 31474560]
  11. iScience. 2022 May 17;25(6):104370 [PMID: 35601914]
  12. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Nov 7;103(45):17053-7 [PMID: 17075063]
  13. Ann Neurol. 2016 Nov;80(5):718-729 [PMID: 27717082]
  14. J Med Ethics. 2019 Feb;45(2):131-139 [PMID: 30367014]
  15. Nature. 2014 Nov 13;515(7526):274-8 [PMID: 25307057]
  16. Nat Protoc. 2014 Oct;9(10):2329-40 [PMID: 25188634]
  17. Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 30;10:50 [PMID: 30761035]
  18. J Med Ethics. 2021 Aug;47(8):567-571 [PMID: 32001547]
  19. Mol Psychiatry. 2018 Dec;23(12):2363-2374 [PMID: 30171212]
  20. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2016 Jul;17(7):450-61 [PMID: 27225071]
  21. Cell Stem Cell. 2017 Sep 7;21(3):383-398.e7 [PMID: 28757360]
  22. Nat Commun. 2015 Nov 17;6:8896 [PMID: 26573335]
  23. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017 Aug;18(8):498-509 [PMID: 28655877]
  24. Neuropsychol Rev. 2010 Dec;20(4):327-48 [PMID: 21042938]
  25. Am J Transl Res. 2014 Jan 15;6(2):114-8 [PMID: 24489990]
  26. Neuroreport. 2018 May 2;29(7):588-593 [PMID: 29570159]
  27. Nat Methods. 2019 Nov;16(11):1169-1175 [PMID: 31591580]
  28. Int J Comp Psychol. 2010;23(3):401-413 [PMID: 24493908]
  29. J Cyst Fibros. 2021 May;20(3):443-451 [PMID: 33303364]
  30. Nat Cell Biol. 2018 Jun;20(6):642-645 [PMID: 29784910]
  31. EMBO Rep. 2016 Jul;17(7):938-41 [PMID: 27296278]
  32. PLoS Biol. 2009 Feb 24;7(2):e42 [PMID: 19243222]
  33. Cell Rep. 2019 Mar 19;26(12):3203-3211.e5 [PMID: 30893594]
  34. Brain Res. 2021 Jan 1;1750:147146 [PMID: 33068633]
  35. Nat Methods. 2018 Aug;15(8):631-639 [PMID: 30038414]
  36. Nature. 2019 Apr;568(7752):336-343 [PMID: 30996318]
  37. J Med Ethics. 2018 Sep;44(9):611-612 [PMID: 29535181]
  38. Dev Psychobiol. 1972;5(4):297-305 [PMID: 4679817]
  39. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Dec;83:765-773 [PMID: 27079562]
  40. Cell Stem Cell. 2019 Oct 3;25(4):462-472 [PMID: 31585092]
  41. J Med Ethics. 2018 Sep;44(9):606-610 [PMID: 29491041]
  42. Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Sep 24;15:701258 [PMID: 34630057]
  43. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2020 Jul;26(7):682-697 [PMID: 32087606]
  44. Science. 1970 Jan 2;167(3914):86-7 [PMID: 4982211]
  45. Cell Rep. 2018 Apr 24;23(4):1220-1229 [PMID: 29694897]
  46. iScience. 2019 Nov 22;21:57-67 [PMID: 31654854]
  47. Sci Adv. 2018 Oct 10;4(10):eaat5847 [PMID: 30324134]
  48. Brain Res. 2020 Apr 1;1732:146653 [PMID: 32017900]
  49. Stem Cell Reports. 2021 Jun 8;16(6):1398-1408 [PMID: 34048692]
  50. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2012 May;1(5):409-21 [PMID: 23197820]
  51. Nat Biotechnol. 2014 Aug;32(8):742-8 [PMID: 25093884]
  52. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2021 Mar;111:32-39 [PMID: 32499191]
  53. Eur J Hum Genet. 2016 Jul;24(7):1096 [PMID: 27307115]
  54. Sci Adv. 2021 Jan 22;7(4): [PMID: 33523957]
  55. Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(9):53-5 [PMID: 26305756]
  56. Nat Med. 2016 Apr;22(4):338 [PMID: 27050584]
  57. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 May 8;98(10):5937-42 [PMID: 11331768]
  58. Trends Mol Med. 2020 Mar;26(3):245-249 [PMID: 31982341]
  59. Nat Commun. 2022 Dec 26;13(1):7945 [PMID: 36572698]
  60. Bioengineering (Basel). 2020 Dec 18;7(4): [PMID: 33352983]
  61. Cell Stem Cell. 2016 Aug 4;19(2):248-257 [PMID: 27476966]
  62. Nat Biotechnol. 2018 Jun;36(5):432-441 [PMID: 29658944]
  63. Stem Cell Reports. 2019 Mar 5;12(3):518-531 [PMID: 30799274]
  64. Science. 2005 Jul 15;309(5733):385-6 [PMID: 16020716]
  65. Nature. 2022 Oct;610(7931):319-326 [PMID: 36224417]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0brainorganoidshumancodeconductHumanfunctionalnetworksneuraldevelopmenttechnologyincludingintrinsicconsiderationsconsciousnessmoralethicsorganoidmodelsderivedembryonicinducedpluripotentstemcellsmimicbasiccerebralmicroanatomydemonstratesimpleneuronalBrainrapidlyexpandingavenuebiomedicalresearchgeneralspecifically:regenerationcentralnervoussystempathophysiologyHoweverreplicatingaspectselectricallyactiverequiresresponsiblereviewfocusdiscussionextrinsicethicalfactorsassociatedorganoids:arisegrowingcomplexityhuman-animalchimerismquestionshuman-likebeingsfallhierarchyExtrinsicexploreobtainmentmanufacturingproductionsophisticatedproductssummarythoughtfulusingtowardsadvancementsciencemedicinecrucialarticleshallfacilitatestructuredthoughtprocessapproachinglandscapecancerbiologyculture

Similar Articles

Cited By