Intentional learning establishes multiple attentional sets that simultaneously guide attention.

Sisi Wang, Geoffrey F Woodman
Author Information
  1. Sisi Wang: Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University. ORCID
  2. Geoffrey F Woodman: Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University.

Abstract

One of the key human cognitive capabilities is to extract regularities from the environment to guide behavior. An attentional set for a target feature can be established through statistical learning of probabilistic target associations; however, whether an array of attentional sets of predictive target features can be established during intentional learning, and how they might guide attention, is not known yet. To address these questions, we had human observers perform a visual search task where we instructed them to try to use color to find their target shape. We structured the task with a fine-grained statistical regularity such that the target shapes appeared in different colors with five unique probabilities (i.e., 33%, 26%, 19%, 12%, and 5%) while we recorded their electroencephalogram. Observers rapidly learned these regularities, evidenced by being faster to report targets that appeared in higher probability colors. These effects were not due to unequal sample sizes or simple feature priming. More importantly, equivalent speeding across a set of high-probability colors suggests that the brain was driving attention to multiple targets simultaneously. Our electrophysiological results showed larger amplitude N2 posterior contralateral component, indexing perceptual attention, and late positive complex (LPC) component, indexing postperceptual processes, for targets paired with high-probability colors. These electrophysiological data suggest that the learned attentional sets change both perceptual selection and how postperceptual decisions are made. In sum, we show that multiple attentional sets can be established during intentional learning that accompanies general task acquisition and that these attentional sets can simultaneously guide attention by enhancing both perceptual attention and postperceptual processes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

References

  1. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1996 Sep;99(3):225-34 [PMID: 8862112]
  2. Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Nov;8(11):494-500 [PMID: 15491903]
  3. J Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Oct;31(10):1535-1548 [PMID: 31180265]
  4. Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60 [PMID: 19897823]
  5. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Jun;152(6):1723-1734 [PMID: 36701525]
  6. Learn Behav. 2012 Sep;40(3):241-54 [PMID: 22926999]
  7. Q J Exp Psychol. 1973 May;25(2):207-22 [PMID: 4515818]
  8. Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(5):675-81 [PMID: 15721180]
  9. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Oct;80(7):1763-1774 [PMID: 29968080]
  10. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Jan;152(1):268-300 [PMID: 35901412]
  11. Cereb Cortex. 2000 Dec;10(12):1233-41 [PMID: 11073872]
  12. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2014 Mar;109:193-206 [PMID: 24076012]
  13. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Feb;41(1):86-101 [PMID: 25485665]
  14. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Feb;127(2):324-39 [PMID: 17868628]
  15. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 May;73(4):996-1002 [PMID: 21287315]
  16. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Mar;3(3):201-15 [PMID: 11994752]
  17. Psychol Rev. 2007 Jul;114(3):599-631 [PMID: 17638498]
  18. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Oct;39(5):1433-42 [PMID: 23244044]
  19. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Jan;44(1):13-17 [PMID: 29309194]
  20. Neural Netw. 2006 Jun;19(5):535-46 [PMID: 16527453]
  21. J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Aug;26(8):1736-47 [PMID: 24456393]
  22. Percept Psychophys. 1999 Feb;61(2):291-307 [PMID: 10089762]
  23. Hippocampus. 2016 Jan;26(1):3-8 [PMID: 26332666]
  24. Cortex. 2017 May;90:31-45 [PMID: 28324696]
  25. Cognition. 2005 Jan;94(3):B101-11 [PMID: 15617666]
  26. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003 Jun;29(3):631-49 [PMID: 12848330]
  27. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 May;72(4):951-62 [PMID: 20436192]
  28. Psychol Rev. 1992 Jan;99(1):22-44 [PMID: 1546117]
  29. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Aug;42(8):1215-30 [PMID: 26950386]
  30. Top Cogn Sci. 2019 Jul;11(3):482-503 [PMID: 30942536]
  31. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Sep;138(1):176-86 [PMID: 21745649]
  32. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Jun;24(3):780-90 [PMID: 9627416]
  33. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Aug;41(4):1112-23 [PMID: 26010589]
  34. Vision Res. 2010 Jun 25;50(14):1396-401 [PMID: 20079758]
  35. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1995;18:193-222 [PMID: 7605061]
  36. Nature. 1997 Nov 20;390(6657):279-81 [PMID: 9384378]
  37. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Jun;34(3):509-30 [PMID: 18505320]
  38. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Jul;15(7):327-34 [PMID: 21665518]
  39. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Sep;45(9):1146-1163 [PMID: 31144860]
  40. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Jul;81(5):1405-1414 [PMID: 30868474]
  41. Cortex. 2018 May;102:67-95 [PMID: 29096874]
  42. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Jul;79(5):1311-1322 [PMID: 28439792]
  43. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Oct;35(5):1275-91 [PMID: 19803636]
  44. Nat Neurosci. 2003 Feb;6(2):182-9 [PMID: 12514738]
  45. Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Feb;24(1):87-114; discussion 114-85 [PMID: 11515286]
  46. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Jan;72(1):5-18 [PMID: 20045875]
  47. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Apr;31(2):248-61 [PMID: 15826228]
  48. Cereb Cortex. 2007 Sep;17 Suppl 1:i118-24 [PMID: 17725994]
  49. Nebr Symp Motiv. 2012;59:117-46 [PMID: 23437632]
  50. Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Aug;20(4):615-30 [PMID: 23325703]
  51. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Feb 3;95(3):781-7 [PMID: 9448241]
  52. Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 Oct;29:97-101 [PMID: 30711911]
  53. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Dec;36(6):1419-29 [PMID: 20718564]
  54. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Apr;78(3):761-73 [PMID: 26754811]
  55. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Nov;73(8):2481-8 [PMID: 21879418]
  56. Mem Cognit. 1994 Nov;22(6):657-72 [PMID: 7808275]
  57. Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Jun;17(3):421-6 [PMID: 20551369]
  58. Psychol Sci. 2012 Aug 1;23(8):887-98 [PMID: 22760886]
  59. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Jun;11(6):243-50 [PMID: 17475539]
  60. Mem Cognit. 2004 Jan;32(1):12-20 [PMID: 15078040]
  61. Percept Psychophys. 1996 Oct;58(7):977-91 [PMID: 8920835]
  62. J Vis. 2013 Jul 01;13(3):14 [PMID: 23818660]
  63. Psychol Sci. 2000 Nov;11(6):467-73 [PMID: 11202491]
  64. J Neurosci. 2010 Aug 18;30(33):11096-103 [PMID: 20720117]
  65. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1994 Oct;20(5):1000-14 [PMID: 7964526]
  66. Percept Psychophys. 1990 Dec;48(6):603-17 [PMID: 2270192]
  67. Psychophysiology. 2008 Mar;45(2):250-74 [PMID: 17995913]
  68. Nature. 1999 Aug 26;400(6747):867-9 [PMID: 10476964]
  69. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003 Jun;29(3):650-7 [PMID: 12848331]
  70. Curr Biol. 2012 Sep 11;22(17):1622-7 [PMID: 22885059]
  71. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Mar;45(3):419-433 [PMID: 30802131]
  72. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Nov;45(11):2080-2097 [PMID: 30688477]
  73. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024 Sep;153(9):2314-2327 [PMID: 39088005]
  74. Nebr Symp Motiv. 2012;59:183-208 [PMID: 23437634]
  75. Psychophysiology. 2015 Nov;52(11):1483-97 [PMID: 26338030]
  76. Psychol Res. 2009 May;73(3):317-26 [PMID: 18665392]
  77. Nature. 2004 Apr 15;428(6984):748-51 [PMID: 15085132]
  78. J Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Dec;28(12):1947-1963 [PMID: 27458746]
  79. J Vis. 2013 Feb 25;13(3): [PMID: 23444390]
  80. PLoS One. 2014 Jan 28;9(1):e86848 [PMID: 24489793]
  81. Eur J Neurosci. 2012 Apr;35(7):1011-23 [PMID: 22487032]
  82. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2000;23:315-41 [PMID: 10845067]
  83. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 Jul;46(7):681-696 [PMID: 32271078]
  84. Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6 [PMID: 9176952]
  85. Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Oct;29(5):1890-1897 [PMID: 35445289]
  86. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Feb;40(1):1-6 [PMID: 24099589]
  87. PLoS One. 2016 Mar 10;11(3):e0151188 [PMID: 26964102]
  88. Neural Netw. 2005 Apr;18(3):225-30 [PMID: 15896570]
  89. Psychol Rev. 2002 Apr;109(2):376-400 [PMID: 11990323]
  90. Clin Neuropsychol. 2010 Nov;24(8):1355-64 [PMID: 20967687]
  91. Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Aug;16(8):437-43 [PMID: 22795563]
  92. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Oct;45(10):1291-1303 [PMID: 31157536]
  93. Psychophysiology. 1990 Jul;27(4):417-28 [PMID: 2236443]
  94. PLoS One. 2014 Jul 14;9(7):e102337 [PMID: 25019526]
  95. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Jun;38(3):758-75 [PMID: 22201470]
  96. Percept Mot Skills. 1966 Dec;23(3):1211-4 [PMID: 5972923]
  97. Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Mar;1(3): [PMID: 36711068]
  98. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Oct;24(5):1368-84 [PMID: 9988597]
  99. Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 Sep;19(9):524-33 [PMID: 26255970]
  100. Front Psychol. 2014 Nov 06;5:1195 [PMID: 25414676]
  101. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 May;29(3):362-72 [PMID: 12776747]
  102. J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Aug;20(8):1423-33 [PMID: 18303979]
  103. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Oct;32(5):1243-65 [PMID: 17002535]
  104. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Aug;72(6):1495-509 [PMID: 20675796]
  105. Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Jun;29(3):901-909 [PMID: 34918268]
  106. J Neurosci. 2010 Aug 18;30(33):11177-87 [PMID: 20720125]
  107. Annu Rev Psychol. 1997;48:269-97 [PMID: 9046562]
  108. J Neurosci Methods. 2004 Mar 15;134(1):9-21 [PMID: 15102499]

Grants

  1. P30 EY008126/NEI NIH HHS
  2. T32 EY007135/NEI NIH HHS
  3. /National Science Foundation
  4. /Foundation for the National Institutes of Health

MeSH Term

Humans
Attention
Electroencephalography
Female
Male
Adult
Young Adult
Learning
Color Perception
Intention
Evoked Potentials
Reaction Time
Adolescent

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0attentionalattentiontargetsetsguidecanlearningcolorsestablishedtasktargetsmultiplesimultaneouslyperceptualpostperceptualhumanregularitiessetfeaturestatisticalintentionalappearedlearnedhigh-probabilityelectrophysiologicalcomponentindexingprocessesOnekeycognitivecapabilitiesextractenvironmentbehaviorprobabilisticassociationshoweverwhetherarraypredictivefeaturesmightknownyetaddressquestionsobserversperformvisualsearchinstructedtryusecolorfindshapestructuredfine-grainedregularityshapesdifferentfiveuniqueprobabilitiesie33%26%19%12%5%recordedelectroencephalogramObserversrapidlyevidencedfasterreporthigherprobabilityeffectsdueunequalsamplesizessimpleprimingimportantlyequivalentspeedingacrosssuggestsbraindrivingresultsshowedlargeramplitudeN2posteriorcontralaterallatepositivecomplexLPCpaireddatasuggestchangeselectiondecisionsmadesumshowaccompaniesgeneralacquisitionenhancingPsycInfoDatabaseRecordc2024APArightsreservedIntentionalestablishes

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)