Nepotism mediates enforced cooperation in asymmetric negotiations.

Irene Garc��a-Ruiz, Michael Taborsky
Author Information
  1. Irene Garc��a-Ruiz: Division of Behavioural Ecology, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, 3032 Hinterkappelen, Switzerland.
  2. Michael Taborsky: Division of Behavioural Ecology, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, 3032 Hinterkappelen, Switzerland.

Abstract

In cooperative societies, group members typically exchange different commodities among each other, which involves an incessant negotiation process. How is the conflict of fitness interests resolved in this continual bargaining process between unequal partners, so that maintaining the cooperative interaction is the best option for all parties involved? Theory predicts that relatedness between group members may alleviate the conflict of fitness interests, thereby promoting the evolution of cooperation. To evaluate the relative importance of relatedness and direct fitness effects in the negotiation process, we experimentally manipulated both the relatedness and mutual behavioral responses of dominant breeders and subordinate helpers in the cooperatively breeding cichlid fish . Results show that coercion by breeders is crucial for the performance of alloparental egg care by helpers, but that kinship significantly decreases the need for coercion as predicted by theory. This illustrates the relative importance of kinship and enforcement in the bargaining process.

Keywords

Associated Data

figshare | 10.6084/m9.figshare.26018287

References

  1. PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e25673 [PMID: 22022428]
  2. J Theor Biol. 2003 Jun 7;222(3):331-5 [PMID: 12732479]
  3. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2011 May;86(2):511-30 [PMID: 20849492]
  4. J Theor Biol. 2004 Apr 21;227(4):487-501 [PMID: 15038984]
  5. Nat Commun. 2017 Oct 23;8(1):1094 [PMID: 29061969]
  6. Sci Adv. 2023 Mar 3;9(9):eadd2146 [PMID: 36867697]
  7. Curr Biol. 2015 Nov 16;25(22):3011-6 [PMID: 26549255]
  8. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1341 [PMID: 23299891]
  9. Nature. 2009 Nov 5;462(7269):51-7 [PMID: 19890322]
  10. Sci Adv. 2022 May 27;8(21):eabl7853 [PMID: 35622922]
  11. Curr Biol. 2007 Aug 21;17(16):R661-72 [PMID: 17714660]
  12. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Oct 28;368(1631):20130076 [PMID: 24167306]
  13. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Feb 5;371(1687):20150101 [PMID: 26729940]
  14. Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Apr 22;274(1613):1093-9 [PMID: 17301018]
  15. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Feb 5;371(1687):20150084 [PMID: 26729924]
  16. Mol Ecol. 2008 Oct;17(19):4359-70 [PMID: 19378408]
  17. Anim Behav. 1998 Dec;56(6):1375-1382 [PMID: 9933533]
  18. J Theor Biol. 2014 Sep 7;356:1-10 [PMID: 24727186]
  19. Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Apr 22;279(1733):1506-14 [PMID: 22072611]
  20. Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Nov 21;285(1891): [PMID: 30464062]
  21. Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Jan 7;274(1606):53-60 [PMID: 17015339]
  22. Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 Jan;20(1):33-8 [PMID: 16701338]
  23. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Nov 12;364(1533):3217-27 [PMID: 19805429]
  24. Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Aug 22;281(1789):20140184 [PMID: 24990673]
  25. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Apr 12;113(15):4104-9 [PMID: 27035973]
  26. Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Mar 14;285(1874): [PMID: 29514963]
  27. R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Feb 12;7(2):191808 [PMID: 32257335]
  28. J Evol Biol. 2006 Sep;19(5):1365-76 [PMID: 16910958]
  29. Mol Ecol. 2018 May;27(10):2435-2446 [PMID: 29663552]
  30. Nature. 2003 Apr 10;422(6932):580 [PMID: 12686989]
  31. Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Jul 22;277(1691):2219-26 [PMID: 20236979]
  32. Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Feb 22;272(1561):445-54 [PMID: 15734700]
  33. Nat Ecol Evol. 2019 Jul;3(7):1018-1029 [PMID: 31239554]
  34. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Feb 5;371(1687):20150089 [PMID: 26729929]
  35. PLoS One. 2010 May 26;5(5):e10784 [PMID: 20520816]
  36. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 May 16;114(20):5207-5212 [PMID: 28439031]
  37. Biol Lett. 2014 Feb 05;10(2):20131069 [PMID: 24501270]
  38. Science. 2002 Apr 5;296(5565):69-72 [PMID: 11935014]
  39. PLoS One. 2016 Mar 16;11(3):e0150953 [PMID: 26982704]
  40. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2018 Feb;93(1):457-468 [PMID: 28699275]
  41. Behav Ecol. 2023 Feb 28;34(3):363-372 [PMID: 37192918]
  42. Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Feb 06;280(1756):20122772 [PMID: 23390105]
  43. Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 Feb;14(2):53-57 [PMID: 10234252]
  44. Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Nov 22;271(1555):2367-74 [PMID: 15556889]
  45. Curr Biol. 2006 Jul 11;16(13):R482-3 [PMID: 16824903]
  46. Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Apr 7;271(1540):669-74 [PMID: 15209098]
  47. Biol Lett. 2005 Dec 22;1(4):396-9 [PMID: 17148216]
  48. Trends Ecol Evol. 2014 Aug;29(8):476-84 [PMID: 24996259]
  49. Evolution. 2008 Oct;62(10):2592-9 [PMID: 18691258]
  50. Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Jan 22;278(1703):170-8 [PMID: 20798110]
  51. Biol Lett. 2014 May;10(5):20140229 [PMID: 24872462]
  52. J Anim Ecol. 2018 Sep;87(5):1227-1238 [PMID: 29560614]
  53. Am Nat. 2009 Jun;173(6):759-71 [PMID: 19374506]
  54. Nature. 1995 Jan 19;373(6511):209-16 [PMID: 7816134]
  55. Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Jun 7;277(1688):1721-8 [PMID: 20129991]
  56. Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Feb 7;272(1560):325-31 [PMID: 15705559]
  57. Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Apr 7;276(1660):1263-8 [PMID: 19129138]
  58. J Evol Biol. 2017 Mar;30(3):603-615 [PMID: 27987525]
  59. J Theor Biol. 1964 Jul;7(1):17-52 [PMID: 5875340]
  60. Am J Primatol. 2011 Nov;73(11):1127-33 [PMID: 21769908]
  61. Am Nat. 2011 Apr;177(4):486-95 [PMID: 21460570]
  62. Ecol Lett. 2005 Sep;8(9):968-975 [PMID: 34517681]
  63. J Evol Biol. 2006 Sep;19(5):1383-5; discussion 1426-36 [PMID: 16910961]
  64. Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Jul 22;282(1811): [PMID: 26136450]
  65. Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Jan 22;273(1583):171-8 [PMID: 16555784]
  66. Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Nov 22;282(1819): [PMID: 26582022]
  67. Nature. 1999 Sep 23;401(6751):368-71 [PMID: 10517633]
  68. Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Aug 7;272(1572):1593-9 [PMID: 16048775]
  69. Commun Biol. 2020 Nov 6;3(1):649 [PMID: 33159133]
  70. Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Feb 7;277(1680):437-45 [PMID: 19846458]
  71. Trends Ecol Evol. 2012 May;27(5):288-95 [PMID: 22284810]
  72. J Evol Biol. 2010 Jul;23(7):1351-63 [PMID: 20500365]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0processfitnessrelatednesscooperativegroupmembersnegotiationconflictinterestsbargainingevolutioncooperationrelativeimportancebreedershelperscoercionkinshipsocietiestypicallyexchangedifferentcommoditiesamonginvolvesincessantresolvedcontinualunequalpartnersmaintaininginteractionbestoptionpartiesinvolved?TheorypredictsmayalleviatetherebypromotingevaluatedirecteffectsexperimentallymanipulatedmutualbehavioralresponsesdominantsubordinatecooperativelybreedingcichlidfishResultsshowcrucialperformancealloparentaleggcaresignificantlydecreasesneedpredictedtheoryillustratesenforcementNepotismmediatesenforcedasymmetricnegotiationsPiscinebehaviorPsychologicalSocialsciences

Similar Articles

Cited By