Microbial contamination of spittoons and germicidal effect of irradiation with krypton chloride excimer lamps (Far UV-C 222 nm).

Hiroaki Tanimoto, Yoshimasa Ogawa, Takayuki Nambu, Toru Koi, Hiroyuki Ohashi, Toshinori Okinaga, Kazuyo Yamamoto
Author Information
  1. Hiroaki Tanimoto: Department of Operative Dentistry, Osaka Dental University, Osaka, Hirakata, Japan. ORCID
  2. Yoshimasa Ogawa: Ushio Inc., Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
  3. Takayuki Nambu: Department of Microbiology, Osaka Dental University, Osaka, Hirakata, Japan.
  4. Toru Koi: Ushio Inc., Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan. ORCID
  5. Hiroyuki Ohashi: Ushio Inc., Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
  6. Toshinori Okinaga: Department of Microbiology, Osaka Dental University, Osaka, Hirakata, Japan.
  7. Kazuyo Yamamoto: Department of Operative Dentistry, Osaka Dental University, Osaka, Hirakata, Japan.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In dentistry, instruments, appliances, and body fluids such as saliva or blood are possible sources of infection. Although conventional antiseptic procedures effectively prevent infection, spittoons cannot be sanitized between each treated patient and are usually washed only with running water. However, there is currently no fast and efficient disinfection method that can be implemented between treatments. An optically filtered krypton chloride excimer lamp using ultraviolet light (Far UV-C) in the 200-230 nm wavelength range (innocuous to humans) has been recently used as a virus- and bacteria-inactivating technology. This study aimed to identify the bioburden of a dental spittoon and examine the susceptibility of two oral Streptococcus and two Enterococci to 222-nm Far UV-C by irradiating the spittoon with 222 nm Far UV-C for 5 min before evaluating the disinfection effect.
METHODS: Bacterial analysis and real-time polymerase-chain reaction testing was used to confirm the spittoon's biological contamination. Bacterial susceptibility to a 222-nm Far UV-C was determined with a graded dose irradiation test. After each treatment, the spittoon was irradiated with 222-nm Far UV-C for 5 min, and the disinfecting effect was evaluated. Microbial analysis of the spittoon's surface was performed using the Silva database.
RESULTS: We found that > 97% of the microbes consisted of six bacterial phyla, whereas no viruses were found. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was frequently detected. The 1-log reduction value of two oral-derived Streptococci and two Enterococci species at 222-nm Far UV-C was 4.5-7.3 mJ/cm2. Exposure of the spittoon to 222-nm Far UV-C at 3.6-13.5 mJ/cm2 significantly decreased bacterial counts (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Irradiation with 222-nm Far UV-C at 3.6-13.5 mJ/cm2 significantly eliminates bacteria in spittoons, even when they are only rinsed with water. Hence, 222-nm Far UV-C irradiation may inhibit the risk of bacterial transmission from droplets in sink surfaces.

References

  1. Oral Dis. 2021 Apr;27 Suppl 3:674-683 [PMID: 32391651]
  2. J Oral Microbiol. 2012;4: [PMID: 22701774]
  3. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009 Jan;30(1):25-33 [PMID: 19046054]
  4. Photochem Photobiol. 2022 Nov;98(6):1365-1371 [PMID: 35313036]
  5. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jan;41(Database issue):D590-6 [PMID: 23193283]
  6. mSystems. 2018 Dec 4;3(6): [PMID: 30534599]
  7. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2003 Dec 19;52(RR-17):1-61 [PMID: 14685139]
  8. J Wound Care. 2021 Feb 02;30(2):96-104 [PMID: 33573483]
  9. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2021 Jun;34:102334 [PMID: 33971330]
  10. Photochem Photobiol. 2023 May-Jun;99(3):967-974 [PMID: 36081379]
  11. Am J Infect Control. 2021 Mar;49(3):299-301 [PMID: 32896604]
  12. Microbiome. 2018 May 17;6(1):90 [PMID: 29773078]
  13. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2019 Jan 9;85(2): [PMID: 30367005]
  14. J Hosp Infect. 2020 Mar 31;: [PMID: 32243946]
  15. Nat Biotechnol. 2019 Aug;37(8):852-857 [PMID: 31341288]
  16. J Photochem Photobiol. 2022 Mar;9:100096 [PMID: 34931181]
  17. J Oral Microbiol. 2022 Aug 23;14(1):2107316 [PMID: 36034883]
  18. Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Dec 07;10(12): [PMID: 34943711]
  19. PLoS One. 2020 Aug 12;15(8):e0235948 [PMID: 32785216]
  20. PLoS One. 2013 Oct 16;8(10):e76968 [PMID: 24146947]
  21. Photochem Photobiol. 2020 Jul;96(4):853-862 [PMID: 32222977]
  22. Microorganisms. 2019 Sep 14;7(9): [PMID: 31540050]
  23. Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Nov 04;10(11): [PMID: 34827286]
  24. Am J Infect Control. 2021 Jun;49(6):800-803 [PMID: 33186680]

MeSH Term

Ultraviolet Rays
Disinfection
Humans
Enterococcus

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0FarUV-C222-nmspittoontwo5spittoonsnmeffectirradiationbacterial3mJ/cm2infectionwaterdisinfectionkryptonchlorideexcimerusingusedsusceptibilityEnterococci222minBacterialanalysisspittoon'scontaminationMicrobialfound6-13significantlyBACKGROUND:dentistryinstrumentsappliancesbodyfluidssalivabloodpossiblesourcesAlthoughconventionalantisepticprocedureseffectivelypreventsanitizedtreatedpatientusuallywashedrunningHowevercurrentlyfastefficientmethodcanimplementedtreatmentsopticallyfilteredlampultravioletlight200-230wavelengthrangeinnocuoushumansrecentlyvirus-bacteria-inactivatingtechnologystudyaimedidentifybioburdendentalexamineoralStreptococcusirradiatingevaluatingMETHODS:real-timepolymerase-chainreactiontestingconfirmbiologicaldeterminedgradeddosetesttreatmentirradiateddisinfectingevaluatedsurfaceperformedSilvadatabaseRESULTS:>97%microbesconsistedsixphylawhereasvirusesPseudomonasaeruginosafrequentlydetected1-logreductionvalueoral-derivedStreptococcispecies45-7Exposuredecreasedcountsp<0001CONCLUSIONS:IrradiationeliminatesbacteriaevenrinsedHencemayinhibitrisktransmissiondropletssinksurfacesgermicidallamps

Similar Articles

Cited By