Total knee arthroplasty after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a narrative review.

Mattia Alessio-Mazzola, Nicolo' Biavardi, Giuseppe Solarino, Giuseppe Marongiu, Vincenzo Salini, Giacomo Placella
Author Information
  1. Mattia Alessio-Mazzola: IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Unità Clinica di Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Milan, Italy. ORCID
  2. Nicolo' Biavardi: Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
  3. Giuseppe Solarino: Department of Translational Biomedicine and Neuroscience, Università degli studi di Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy. ORCID
  4. Giuseppe Marongiu: Department of Surgical Science, University of Cagliari, Policlinico Universitario Dullio Casula, AOU Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy. ORCID
  5. Vincenzo Salini: Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy. ORCID
  6. Giacomo Placella: Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy. ORCID

Abstract

Background and Objective: Knee replacement following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction can be demanding due to altered anatomy, soft tissue scars, bone loss, extensor mechanism complications, and knee instability. This narrative review summarizes the strategies and approaches to managing operative challenges in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) following ACL reconstruction.
Methods: Studies reporting outcomes of patients who underwent TKA after ACL reconstruction were retrieved and assessed to be included in this review that synthesizes the available evidence highlighting the pitfalls encountered during surgery, the intraoperative challenges posed by ligament balancing and exposure, and the leading role of modular and retained implants.
Key Content and Findings: TKA following ACL reconstruction has a high rate of intra-operative complications such as instability, bone loss, difficult exposure and demanding soft tissue balancing, representing a revision surgery rather than routine primary knee arthroplasty and a revision-oriented skill set and modular components are recommended to significantly optimize both surgical strategy and patient outcomes. With a rising incidence of ACL injuries and growing reconstructions, anticipating an increase in TKA procedures, this review aims to provide a call for rethinking clinical approaches to ensure effective and patient-centric care.
Conclusions: This narrative review seems to indicate that TKA after ACL reconstruction should be considered as revision surgery and modular components should be used. However, future prospective and high-quality studies are required to better clarify risk factors and give strong recommendations for this complex surgery.

Keywords

References

  1. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Sep;42(9):2242-52 [PMID: 24214929]
  2. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Apr 1;5(4):e226722 [PMID: 35420662]
  3. Knee. 2006 Mar;13(2):111-7 [PMID: 16490357]
  4. Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Jul 12;7(7):2325967119857551 [PMID: 31321251]
  5. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Feb 1;99(3):185-189 [PMID: 28145948]
  6. J Arthroplasty. 2018 Sep;33(9):2821-2826 [PMID: 29731267]
  7. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2021 Aug 1;16(4):971-977 [PMID: 34386276]
  8. Am J Sports Med. 2006 May;34(5):721-32 [PMID: 16399931]
  9. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2017 Nov;25(11):1797-1803 [PMID: 28801208]
  10. J Arthroplasty. 2008 Oct;23(7):1005-8 [PMID: 18534505]
  11. EFORT Open Rev. 2023 Nov 01;8(11):854-864 [PMID: 37909702]
  12. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Mar;142(3):481-490 [PMID: 34812921]
  13. J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jul;33(7):2141-2145 [PMID: 29555495]
  14. J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jun;38(6S):S71-S76 [PMID: 36801476]
  15. Bone Joint J. 2019 Jul;101-B(7_Supple_C):77-83 [PMID: 31256640]
  16. J Knee Surg. 2022 Jul;35(8):844-848 [PMID: 33242906]
  17. Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Jan;56(1):e1-e25 [PMID: 23223583]
  18. Knee. 2012 Aug;19(4):275-8 [PMID: 21636280]
  19. Orthopade. 2016 May;45(5):446-51 [PMID: 26526938]
  20. J Arthroplasty. 2018 Dec;33(12):3739-3745 [PMID: 30266325]
  21. Am J Sports Med. 2013 Mar;41(3):544-9 [PMID: 23302260]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0ACLreconstructionreviewTKAligamentkneesurgeryfollowingbonelossnarrativearthroplastymodularKneereplacementanteriorcruciatedemandingsofttissuecomplicationsinstabilityapproacheschallengesoutcomesbalancingexposurerevisioncomponentsBackgroundObjective:canduealteredanatomyscarsextensormechanismsummarizesstrategiesmanagingoperativetotalMethods:StudiesreportingpatientsunderwentretrievedassessedincludedsynthesizesavailableevidencehighlightingpitfallsencounteredintraoperativeposedleadingroleretainedimplantsKeyContentFindings:highrateintra-operativedifficultrepresentingratherroutineprimaryrevision-orientedskillsetrecommendedsignificantlyoptimizesurgicalstrategypatientrisingincidenceinjuriesgrowingreconstructionsanticipatingincreaseproceduresaimsprovidecallrethinkingclinicalensureeffectivepatient-centriccareConclusions:seemsindicateconsideredusedHoweverfutureprospectivehigh-qualitystudiesrequiredbetterclarifyriskfactorsgivestrongrecommendationscomplexTotalreconstruction:augmentmodularity

Similar Articles

Cited By