Communication in the ICU: An Unintended Nocebo Effect?

Irene Riestra Guiance, Lindsey Wallace, Katalin Varga, Alexander Niven, Megan Hosey, Jillene Chitulangoma, Kemuel Philbrick, Ognjen Gajic, Madeline Weiman, Emily Schmitt, David Pasko, Lioudmila Karnatovskaia
Author Information
  1. Irene Riestra Guiance: Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  2. Lindsey Wallace: Department of Critical Care Multidisciplinary Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  3. Katalin Varga: Department of Affective Psychology, E��tv��s Lor��nd University, Budapest, Hungary.
  4. Alexander Niven: Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  5. Megan Hosey: Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. ORCID
  6. Jillene Chitulangoma: Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  7. Kemuel Philbrick: Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  8. Ognjen Gajic: Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  9. Madeline Weiman: Department of Nursing, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  10. Emily Schmitt: Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  11. David Pasko: Department of Respiratory Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  12. Lioudmila Karnatovskaia: Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. ORCID

Abstract

To identify medical phrases utilized by the critical care team that may have an unintended impact on the critically ill patient, we administered an anonymous survey to multi-professional critical care team members. We elicited examples of imprecise language that may have a negative emotional impact on the critically ill. Of the 1600 providers surveyed, 265 offered 1379 examples (912 unique) which were clustered into 5 categories. Medical jargon (eg, "riding the vent") was most prevalent (n���=���549). There were 217 negative suggestions (eg, "you will feel a stick and a burn"). Hyperboles (eg, "black cloud") were common (n���=���198) while homonyms (ie "he fibbed") accounted for 150 examples. Phrases such as "code brown in there" were categorized as metonyms (n���=���144). 121 metaphors/similes (eg, "rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic") were provided. Phrases that have the potential to negatively impact critically ill patient perceptions are commonplace in critical care practice. Whether these everyday communication habits lead to an unintended nocebo effect on mental health outcomes of the critically ill deserves further study.

Keywords

References

  1. Crit Care. 2017 Nov 9;21(1):273 [PMID: 29121983]
  2. Hastings Cent Rep. 2020 Sep;50(5):20-29 [PMID: 33095486]
  3. Pain. 2013 Aug;154(8):1165 [PMID: 23707291]
  4. Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Dec;3(12):1295-1305 [PMID: 31636406]
  5. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2017 Oct;205(10):780-787 [PMID: 28682981]
  6. Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 28;11:1693 [PMID: 32849024]
  7. Am J Crit Care. 2016 Jul;25(4):368-76 [PMID: 27369038]
  8. Front Neurorobot. 2018 May 23;12:23 [PMID: 29875649]
  9. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015 Jul;29(6):537-47 [PMID: 25613986]
  10. Crit Care Med. 2001 Mar;29(3):573-80 [PMID: 11373423]
  11. J Intensive Care Soc. 2023 Nov 29;25(2):128-130 [PMID: 38737306]
  12. BMJ. 2021 Dec 16;375:e067900 [PMID: 34916214]
  13. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007 Jul;51(6):671-8 [PMID: 17567267]
  14. Crit Care Med. 2023 Nov 1;51(11):1538-1546 [PMID: 37358354]
  15. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012 Jun;109(26):459-65 [PMID: 22833756]
  16. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jan 5;376(1):7-9 [PMID: 28052225]
  17. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2020 Sep;48(5):411-414 [PMID: 33021805]
  18. Crit Care Explor. 2021 Jun 15;3(6):e0463 [PMID: 34151284]
  19. J Patient Exp. 2023 Feb 28;10:23743735231158942 [PMID: 36873911]
  20. Lancet. 1985 Jan 5;1(8419):43 [PMID: 2856960]
  21. Brain. 2015 May;138(Pt 5):1160-6 [PMID: 25740220]
  22. Br J Health Psychol. 2015 Sep;20(3):613-31 [PMID: 24944013]
  23. Psychosom Med. 2011 Sep;73(7):598-603 [PMID: 21862825]
  24. Patient Educ Couns. 2023 May;110:107649 [PMID: 36764063]
  25. Arch Neurol. 2006 Apr;63(4):562-9 [PMID: 16606770]
  26. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2016 Nov - Dec;43:23-29 [PMID: 27796253]
  27. Crit Care. 2020 Mar 24;24(1):98 [PMID: 32204724]
  28. Am J Clin Hypn. 1969 Oct;12(2):75-85 [PMID: 5351676]
  29. Br J Anaesth. 2023 Apr;130(4):439-445 [PMID: 36697272]
  30. Intensive Care Med. 2021 Mar;47(3):363-364 [PMID: 33449136]
  31. J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jun;35(6):1861-1864 [PMID: 31713041]
  32. Neurosci Lett. 2010 Apr 26;474(2):88-92 [PMID: 20226842]
  33. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Nov 1;5(11):e2242972 [PMID: 36449293]
  34. Anaesthesia. 2022 Oct;77(10):1113-1119 [PMID: 35918796]
  35. Int J Psychophysiol. 2017 Mar;113:8-16 [PMID: 28041983]
  36. Intensive Care Med. 2015 Dec;41(12):2193-4 [PMID: 26271906]
  37. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2023 Nov;20(11):1550-1553 [PMID: 37669463]
  38. Prog Brain Res. 2005;150:381-95 [PMID: 16186037]
  39. Front Pharmacol. 2019 Feb 13;10:77 [PMID: 30814949]
  40. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Oct 9;104(41):16032-7 [PMID: 17938125]

Grants

  1. K23 HL146741/NHLBI NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0criticallyillegcriticalcareimpactexamplesteammayunintendedpatientnegativePhrasescommunicationnoceboeffectidentifymedicalphrasesutilizedadministeredanonymoussurveymulti-professionalmemberselicitedimpreciselanguageemotional1600providerssurveyed265offered1379912uniqueclustered5categoriesMedicaljargon"ridingvent"prevalentn���=���549217suggestions"youwillfeelstickburn"Hyperboles"blackcloud"commonn���=���198homonymsie"hefibbed"accounted150"codebrownthere"categorizedmetonymsn���=���144121metaphors/similes"rearrangingdeckchairsTitanic"providedpotentialnegativelyperceptionscommonplacepracticeWhethereverydayhabitsleadmentalhealthoutcomesdeservesstudyCommunicationICU:UnintendedNoceboEffect?ICUPTSDpsychology

Similar Articles

Cited By