Evaluating ChatGPT responses to frequently asked patient questions regarding periprosthetic joint infection after total hip and knee arthroplasty.

Xiaojun Hu, Marcel Niemann, Arne Kienzle, Karl Braun, David Alexander Back, Clemens Gwinner, Nora Renz, Ulrich Stoeckle, Andrej Trampuz, Sebastian Meller
Author Information
  1. Xiaojun Hu: Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charit��-Universit��tsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universit��t Berlin, Humboldt-Universit��t zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
  2. Marcel Niemann: Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charit��-Universit��tsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universit��t Berlin, Humboldt-Universit��t zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
  3. Arne Kienzle: Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charit��-Universit��tsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universit��t Berlin, Humboldt-Universit��t zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
  4. Karl Braun: Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
  5. David Alexander Back: Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charit��-Universit��tsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universit��t Berlin, Humboldt-Universit��t zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
  6. Clemens Gwinner: Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charit��-Universit��tsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universit��t Berlin, Humboldt-Universit��t zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
  7. Nora Renz: Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charit��-Universit��tsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universit��t Berlin, Humboldt-Universit��t zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
  8. Ulrich Stoeckle: Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charit��-Universit��tsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universit��t Berlin, Humboldt-Universit��t zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
  9. Andrej Trampuz: Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charit��-Universit��tsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universit��t Berlin, Humboldt-Universit��t zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
  10. Sebastian Meller: Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charit��-Universit��tsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universit��t Berlin, Humboldt-Universit��t zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany. ORCID

Abstract

Background: Patients access relevant information concerning their orthopaedic surgery resources through multiple information channels before presenting for clinical treatment. Recently, artificial intelligence (AI)-powered chatbots have become another source of information for patients. The currently developed AI chat technology ChatGPT (OpenAI LP) is an application for such purposes and it has been rapidly gaining popularity, including for patient education. This study sought to evaluate whether ChatGPT can correctly answer frequently asked questions (FAQ) regarding periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).
Methods: Twelve FAQs about PJI after hip and knee arthroplasty were identified from the websites of fifteen international clinical expert centres. ChatGPT was confronted with these questions and its responses were analysed for their accuracy using an evidence-based approach by a multidisciplinary team. Responses were categorised in four groups: (1) Excellent response that did not require additional improvement; (2) Satisfactory responses that required a small amount of improvement; (3) Satisfactory responses that required moderate improvement; and (4) Unsatisfactory responses that required a large amount of improvement.
Results: From the analysis of the responses given by the chatbot, no reply received an 'unsatisfactory' rating; one did not require any correction; and the majority of the responses required low (7 out of 12) or moderate (4 out of 12) clarification. Although a few responses required minimal clarification, the chatbot responses were generally unbiased and evidence-based, even when asked controversial questions.
Conclusions: The AI-chatbot ChatGPT was able to effectively answer the FAQs of patients seeking information around PJI diagnosis and treatment. The given information was also written in a manner that can be assumed to be understandable by patients. The chatbot could be a valuable clinical tool for patient education and understanding around PJI treatment in the future. Further studies should evaluate its use and acceptance by patients with PJI.

Keywords

References

  1. Bone Joint J. 2020 Dec;102-B(12):1682-1688 [PMID: 33249903]
  2. Int Orthop. 2023 Dec;47(12):3063-3075 [PMID: 37688602]
  3. Int Orthop. 2021 Apr;45(4):847-855 [PMID: 33555351]
  4. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Sep;143(9):5793-5805 [PMID: 37160445]
  5. Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Oct 24;12(11): [PMID: 37998762]
  6. Curr Microbiol. 2022 Dec 6;80(1):29 [PMID: 36474077]
  7. J Orthop Res. 2019 May;37(5):997-1006 [PMID: 30977537]
  8. Cureus. 2022 Jan 5;14(1):e20968 [PMID: 35154947]
  9. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 May 20;102(10):e44 [PMID: 32118653]
  10. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2022 Dec;23(10):917-923 [PMID: 36472508]
  11. Arthroplasty. 2022 Sep 7;4(1):41 [PMID: 36068617]
  12. J Arthroplasty. 2023 Oct;38(10):1998-2003.e1 [PMID: 35271974]
  13. Med Health Care Philos. 2022 Mar;25(1):61-71 [PMID: 34480711]
  14. Crit Care. 2023 Feb 25;27(1):75 [PMID: 36841840]
  15. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2023 Oct;24(8):671-683 [PMID: 37722014]
  16. J Knee Surg. 2021 Oct;34(12):1322-1328 [PMID: 32330974]
  17. J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jul;36(7S):S18-S25 [PMID: 33589279]
  18. N Engl J Med. 2023 Mar 30;388(13):1233-1239 [PMID: 36988602]
  19. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Jul 01;8(7):ofab298 [PMID: 34258321]
  20. Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Mar 19;11(6): [PMID: 36981544]
  21. Global Spine J. 2024 Apr;14(3):998-1017 [PMID: 37560946]
  22. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2018 Sep;11(3):428-438 [PMID: 30062484]
  23. J Bone Jt Infect. 2021 Sep 03;6(8):329-336 [PMID: 34513570]
  24. J Arthroplasty. 2010 Sep;25(6 Suppl):103-7 [PMID: 20570103]
  25. Int Orthop. 2020 Jan;44(1):3-14 [PMID: 31641803]
  26. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2037107 [PMID: 33599773]
  27. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022 Jul 11;114(7):1036-1039 [PMID: 34291289]
  28. Chest. 2013 Sep;144(3):903-914 [PMID: 23538745]
  29. Curr Med Sci. 2021 Dec;41(6):1105-1115 [PMID: 34874486]
  30. Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Sep 27;12(10): [PMID: 37887186]
  31. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022 Jan 19;104(2):160-165 [PMID: 34648464]
  32. Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 May 04;12(5): [PMID: 37237751]
  33. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2020 Mar;17(3):245-252 [PMID: 32098518]
  34. JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 May 17;10:e47564 [PMID: 37195756]
  35. Bone Joint J. 2021 Nov;103-B(11):1702-1708 [PMID: 34719272]
  36. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Sep 22;16(1):569 [PMID: 34551791]
  37. Bone Joint J. 2020 Jun;102-B(6):736-743 [PMID: 32475242]
  38. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2023 Oct 4;105(19):1519-1526 [PMID: 37459402]
  39. J Arthroplasty. 2021 May;36(5):1548-1550 [PMID: 33478892]
  40. J Mater Chem B. 2018 Dec 21;6(47):7854-7861 [PMID: 32255030]
  41. Acta Orthop. 2023 Feb 02;94:38-44 [PMID: 36727913]
  42. J Arthroplasty. 2023 Nov;38(11):2436-2440.e1 [PMID: 37179024]
  43. PLoS One. 2015 Nov 25;10(11):e0141436 [PMID: 26606522]
  44. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Aug 1;480(8):1491-1500 [PMID: 35420556]
  45. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2019 Dec;16(12):1063-1070 [PMID: 31752561]
  46. J Bone Jt Infect. 2022 Feb 25;7(1):43-50 [PMID: 35251904]
  47. J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jun;36(6):2197-2203.e3 [PMID: 33663890]
  48. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Aug 1;480(8):1501-1503 [PMID: 35439226]
  49. Clin Transl Imaging. 2021;9(4):299-339 [PMID: 34277510]
  50. Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jul 17;11(14): [PMID: 37510487]
  51. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Feb;48(2):217-224 [PMID: 30316660]
  52. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Oct 21;22(1):895 [PMID: 34674675]
  53. Iowa Orthop J. 2022;42(2):107-111 [PMID: 36601226]
  54. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014 Apr;27(2):302-45 [PMID: 24696437]
  55. EFORT Open Rev. 2019 Jul 29;4(7):482-494 [PMID: 31423332]
  56. J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jun;35(6S):S308-S312 [PMID: 32192833]
  57. PLoS One. 2016 Mar 03;11(3):e0150866 [PMID: 26938768]
  58. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 19;17(18): [PMID: 32961766]
  59. NPJ Digit Med. 2020 May 4;3:65 [PMID: 32377576]
  60. Med Glas (Zenica). 2020 Feb 1;17(1):92-97 [PMID: 31432657]
  61. Injury. 2018 Mar;49(3):511-522 [PMID: 27639601]
  62. World J Clin Cases. 2022 Dec 26;10(36):13239-13249 [PMID: 36683646]
  63. Acta Ortop Bras. 2022 Dec 02;30(spe2):e248417 [PMID: 36506857]
  64. Can J Surg. 2022 Nov 16;65(6):E756-E762 [PMID: 36384686]
  65. PLoS One. 2023 Mar 21;18(3):e0282709 [PMID: 36943830]
  66. J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 18;11(20): [PMID: 36294449]
  67. Acta Orthop Belg. 2023 Dec;89(4):639-643 [PMID: 38205754]
  68. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2018 Sep;11(3):325-331 [PMID: 29869135]
  69. Orthop Surg. 2022 Feb;14(2):190-198 [PMID: 34935279]
  70. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2020 Dec 11;5(4): [PMID: 33322463]
  71. JBJS Rev. 2020 Jul;8(7):e1900224 [PMID: 32678538]
  72. Arthroplast Today. 2021 Sep 03;11:103-112 [PMID: 34522738]
  73. J Bone Jt Infect. 2022 Sep 19;7(5):191-202 [PMID: 36267262]
  74. mSystems. 2021 Mar 16;6(2): [PMID: 33727397]
  75. Cureus. 2023 Aug 10;15(8):e43262 [PMID: 37692617]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0responsesChatGPTinformationPJIrequiredpatientspatientquestionsimprovementclinicaltreatmenteducationaskedperiprostheticjointinfectionchatbotintelligenceAIOpenAIevaluatecananswerfrequentlyregardingFAQshipkneearthroplastyevidence-basedrequireSatisfactoryamountmoderate4given12clarificationaroundBackground:PatientsaccessrelevantconcerningorthopaedicsurgeryresourcesmultiplechannelspresentingRecentlyartificial-poweredchatbotsbecomeanothersourcecurrentlydevelopedchattechnologyLPapplicationpurposesrapidlygainingpopularityincludingstudysoughtwhethercorrectlyFAQMethods:TwelveidentifiedwebsitesfifteeninternationalexpertcentresconfrontedanalysedaccuracyusingapproachmultidisciplinaryteamResponsescategorisedfourgroups:1Excellentresponseadditional2small3UnsatisfactorylargeResults:analysisreplyreceived'unsatisfactory'ratingonecorrectionmajoritylow7AlthoughminimalgenerallyunbiasedevencontroversialConclusions:AI-chatbotableeffectivelyseekingdiagnosisalsowrittenmannerassumedunderstandablevaluabletoolunderstandingfuturestudiesuseacceptanceEvaluatingtotalArtificialChatbot

Similar Articles

Cited By