Identification of hub genes and key modules in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Hongyue Li, Shaojun Bo, Yutian Guo, Tiantian Wang, Yangwang Pan
Author Information
  1. Hongyue Li: Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Civil Aviation General Hospital (Peking University Civil Aviation School of Clinical Medicine), Beijing, China.
  2. Shaojun Bo: Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Civil Aviation General Hospital (Peking University Civil Aviation School of Clinical Medicine), Beijing, China.
  3. Yutian Guo: Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Civil Aviation General Hospital (Peking University Civil Aviation School of Clinical Medicine), Beijing, China.
  4. Tiantian Wang: Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Civil Aviation General Hospital (Peking University Civil Aviation School of Clinical Medicine), Beijing, China.
  5. Yangwang Pan: Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Civil Aviation General Hospital (Peking University Civil Aviation School of Clinical Medicine), Beijing, China.

Abstract

Background: Laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) is the prominent cancer in head and neck, which greatly affects life quality of patients. The pathogenesis of LSCC is not clear. Presently, the LSCC treatments include chemotherapy, surgery and radiotherapy; however, these methods have poor efficacy in patients with recurrent and persistent cancer. Therefore, the study identified the hub genes accompanied with LSCC, which may be a potential therapeutic target in the future.
Methods: We extracted whole transcriptome high-throughput sequencing (HTS) LSCC data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases and calculate differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between LSCC and normal samples using statistical software RStudio. Through weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), enrichment examination of Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways and Gene Ontology (GO) functions, and examination of protein-protein interaction (PPI) network, we obtained network hub genes and validated the hub genes prognostic value and expression levels of protein.
Results: Through analysis of differential gene expression, from the GEO and TCGA databases 2,139 and 2,774 DEGs were obtained, respectively, 13 and 15 modules were screened from TCGA-LSCC and GSE127165 datasets by WGCNA, respectively. The most significant positive and negative correlation modules in the WGCNA and DEG lists were overlapped, and overall 36 co-expressed overlapping genes were retrieved. Through enrichment analysis of GO and KEGG, it was found that the gene functions were highly concentrated in cell junction assembly, basement membrane, extracellular matrix (ECM) structural constituent etc., and the pathways were mainly concentrated in ECM receptor interaction, focal adhesion, small cell lung cancer, and toxoplasmosis. Through analysis of PPI network analysis, 10 network hub genes (, and ) were obtained. Finally, survival analysis and protein expression validation of these genes confirmed that low expression and high expression remarkably influenced the survival of patient's prognosis with LSCC.
Conclusions: We recognized the hub genes and key modules nearly associated to LSCC and these genes were validated by survival analysis and the database of Human Protein Atlas (HPA), which is of high importance for unveiling the pathogenesis of LSCC and probing for new precise biological marker and potential therapeutic targets.

Keywords

References

  1. Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Jan 30;22(3): [PMID: 33573337]
  2. Biology (Basel). 2017 Mar 07;6(1): [PMID: 28272331]
  3. F1000Res. 2016 Jun 29;5:1542 [PMID: 28232861]
  4. Int J Endocrinol. 2020 Jul 10;2020:9827349 [PMID: 32695162]
  5. J Cell Physiol. 2019 Aug;234(8):12828-12838 [PMID: 30549035]
  6. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jan;41(Database issue):D991-5 [PMID: 23193258]
  7. Bioinformatics. 2007 Jul 15;23(14):1846-7 [PMID: 17496320]
  8. Brief Bioinform. 2005 Sep;6(3):298-304 [PMID: 16212777]
  9. Mol Cancer. 2016 Nov 16;15(1):71 [PMID: 27852311]
  10. Autophagy. 2021 Sep;17(9):2200-2216 [PMID: 32897127]
  11. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Dec 29;9:559 [PMID: 19114008]
  12. Ann Oncol. 2020 Nov;31(11):1462-1475 [PMID: 33239190]
  13. Oncol Lett. 2014 Jun;7(6):1851-1856 [PMID: 24932247]
  14. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 Jan 26;12:35 [PMID: 21269502]
  15. Front Genet. 2020 Aug 28;11:1009 [PMID: 33117416]
  16. PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 Mar 5;15(3):e1006701 [PMID: 30835723]
  17. Exp Ther Med. 2019 Jul;18(1):278-288 [PMID: 31258663]
  18. BMC Syst Biol. 2014;8 Suppl 4:S11 [PMID: 25521941]
  19. Brief Bioinform. 2021 Sep 2;22(5): [PMID: 33839742]
  20. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002 Jan 1;30(1):207-10 [PMID: 11752295]
  21. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Jan;43(Database issue):D447-52 [PMID: 25352553]
  22. Head Neck. 2017 Dec;39(12):2512-2518 [PMID: 28963806]
  23. J Am Chem Soc. 2020 Mar 11;142(10):4892-4903 [PMID: 32114761]
  24. Neurol Sci. 2022 Feb;43(2):961-966 [PMID: 34142261]
  25. Mol Cancer. 2020 Jun 2;19(1):99 [PMID: 32487167]
  26. Bioinformatics. 2019 Nov 1;35(21):4488-4489 [PMID: 30923832]
  27. OMICS. 2012 May;16(5):284-7 [PMID: 22455463]
  28. Methods Enzymol. 2017;585:135-158 [PMID: 28109426]
  29. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Apr 20;43(7):e47 [PMID: 25605792]
  30. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Jul 2;47(W1):W556-W560 [PMID: 31114875]
  31. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021 Mar 25;9:642724 [PMID: 33842467]
  32. Protein Sci. 2018 Jan;27(1):233-244 [PMID: 28940711]
  33. Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteom. 2021 Jun;1869(6):140621 [PMID: 33561576]
  34. Cell. 2018 Apr 5;173(2):283-285 [PMID: 29625045]
  35. Bioengineered. 2021 Dec;12(1):2928-2940 [PMID: 34167437]
  36. BMB Rep. 2016 Nov;49(11):607-611 [PMID: 27530686]
  37. Bioinformatics. 2010 Jan 1;26(1):139-40 [PMID: 19910308]
  38. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Mar;83(5):1203-7 [PMID: 3456579]
  39. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000 Jan 1;28(1):27-30 [PMID: 10592173]
  40. Cell Death Dis. 2019 Jun 17;10(7):477 [PMID: 31209283]
  41. Bioinformatics. 2015 Sep 1;31(17):2912-4 [PMID: 25964631]
  42. BMC Med Genet. 2019 Mar 29;20(1):54 [PMID: 30925905]
  43. Cancers (Basel). 2020 Jan 25;12(2): [PMID: 31991790]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0genesLSCCanalysishubcellnetworkexpressionmodulessquamouscarcinomacancergeneWGCNAobtainedsurvivalkeyLaryngealpatientspathogenesispotentialtherapeuticAtlasTCGAGeneGEOdatabasesDEGsenrichmentexaminationKEGGpathwaysGOfunctionsinteractionPPIvalidatedprotein2respectivelyconcentratedECMhighBackground:prominentheadneckgreatlyaffectslifequalityclearPresentlytreatmentsincludechemotherapysurgeryradiotherapyhowevermethodspoorefficacyrecurrentpersistentThereforestudyidentifiedaccompaniedmaytargetfutureMethods:extractedwholetranscriptomehigh-throughputsequencingHTSdataCancerGenomeExpressionOmnibuscalculatedifferentiallyexpressednormalsamplesusingstatisticalsoftwareRStudioweightedco-expressionKyotoEncyclopediaGenesGenomesOntologyprotein-proteinprognosticvaluelevelsResults:differential1397741315screenedTCGA-LSCCGSE127165datasetssignificantpositivenegativecorrelationDEGlistsoverlappedoverall36co-expressedoverlappingretrievedfoundhighlyjunctionassemblybasementmembraneextracellularmatrixstructuralconstituentetcmainlyreceptorfocaladhesionsmalllungtoxoplasmosis10Finallyvalidationconfirmedlowremarkablyinfluencedpatient'sprognosisConclusions:recognizednearlyassociateddatabaseHumanProteinHPAimportanceunveilingprobingnewprecisebiologicalmarkertargetsIdentificationlaryngealcomprehensivebioinformatic

Similar Articles

Cited By