A multicenter study on accuracy and reproducibility of nanopore sequencing-based genotyping of bacterial pathogens.

Johanna Dabernig-Heinz, Mara Lohde, Martin H��lzer, Adriana Cabal, Rick Conzemius, Christian Brandt, Matthias Kohl, Sven Halbedel, Patrick Hyden, Martin A Fischer, Ariane Pietzka, Beatriz Daza, Evgeny A Idelevich, Anna St��ger, Karsten Becker, Stephan Fuchs, Werner Ruppitsch, Ivo Steinmetz, Christian Kohler, Gabriel E Wagner
Author Information
  1. Johanna Dabernig-Heinz: Diagnostic and Research Institute of Hygiene, Microbiology and Environmental Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria. ORCID
  2. Mara Lohde: Institute for Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
  3. Martin H��lzer: Genome Competence Center (MF1), Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
  4. Adriana Cabal: Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety, Vienna, Austria.
  5. Rick Conzemius: Ares Genetics GmbH, Vienna, Austria.
  6. Christian Brandt: Institute for Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
  7. Matthias Kohl: Medical and Life Sciences Faculty, Furtwangen University, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany.
  8. Sven Halbedel: Nosocomial Pathogens and Antibiotic Resistances (FG13), Robert Koch Institute, Wernigerode, Germany. ORCID
  9. Patrick Hyden: Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety, Vienna, Austria.
  10. Martin A Fischer: Enteropathogenic bacteria and Legionella (FG11), Consultant Laboratory for Listeria, Robert Koch Institute, Wernigerode, Germany.
  11. Ariane Pietzka: Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety, Graz, Austria. ORCID
  12. Beatriz Daza: Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety, Vienna, Austria. ORCID
  13. Evgeny A Idelevich: Friedrich Loeffler Institute for Medical Microbiology, F.-Sauerbruch-Str., Greifswald, Germany. ORCID
  14. Anna St��ger: Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety, Vienna, Austria.
  15. Karsten Becker: Friedrich Loeffler Institute for Medical Microbiology, F.-Sauerbruch-Str., Greifswald, Germany. ORCID
  16. Stephan Fuchs: Genome Competence Center (MF1), Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
  17. Werner Ruppitsch: Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety, Vienna, Austria. ORCID
  18. Ivo Steinmetz: Diagnostic and Research Institute of Hygiene, Microbiology and Environmental Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria. ORCID
  19. Christian Kohler: Friedrich Loeffler Institute for Medical Microbiology, F.-Sauerbruch-Str., Greifswald, Germany. ORCID
  20. Gabriel E Wagner: Diagnostic and Research Institute of Hygiene, Microbiology and Environmental Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria. ORCID

Abstract

Nanopore sequencing has shown the potential to democratize genomic pathogen surveillance due to its ease of use and low entry cost. However, recent genotyping studies showed discrepant results compared to gold-standard short-read sequencing. Furthermore, although essential for widespread application, the reproducibility of nanopore-only genotyping remains largely unresolved. In our multicenter performance study involving five laboratories, four public health-relevant bacterial species were sequenced with the latest R10.4.1 flow cells and V14 chemistry. Core genome MLST analysis of over 500 data sets revealed highly strain-specific typing errors in all species in each laboratory. Investigation of the methylation-related errors revealed consistent DNA motifs at error-prone sites across participants at read level. Depending on the frequency of incorrect target reads, this either leads to correct or incorrect typing, whereby only minimal frequency deviations can randomly determine the final result. PCR preamplification, recent basecalling model updates and an optimized polishing strategy notably diminished the non-reproducible typing. Our study highlights the potential for new errors to appear with each newly sequenced strain and lays the foundation for computational approaches to reduce such typing errors. In conclusion, our multicenter study shows the necessity for a new validation concept for nanopore sequencing-based, standardized bacterial typing, where single nucleotide accuracy is critical.

Keywords

References

  1. Nat Rev Genet. 2012 Sep;13(9):601-612 [PMID: 22868263]
  2. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Oct;21(10):1351-1352 [PMID: 34399091]
  3. J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Sep;53(9):2869-76 [PMID: 26135865]
  4. Commun Biol. 2023 Nov 29;6(1):1215 [PMID: 38030695]
  5. J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Jul;52(7):2365-70 [PMID: 24759713]
  6. Nat Biotechnol. 2023 Jul;41(7):1018-1025 [PMID: 36593407]
  7. Viruses. 2021 Dec 19;13(12): [PMID: 34960817]
  8. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2019 Sep;17(9):533-545 [PMID: 31209399]
  9. GigaByte. 2023 Jan 25;2023:gigabyte75 [PMID: 36949817]
  10. Nat Microbiol. 2022 Apr;7(4):486-496 [PMID: 35365786]
  11. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2013 Oct;11(10):728-36 [PMID: 23979428]
  12. Microb Genom. 2017 Jun 9;3(8):e000118 [PMID: 29026658]
  13. Genome Biol. 2018 Oct 4;19(1):153 [PMID: 30286803]
  14. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Sep;21(9):e281-e289 [PMID: 33587898]
  15. Nat Rev Genet. 2024 Feb;25(2):142-157 [PMID: 37749210]
  16. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012 Nov;10(11):791-7 [PMID: 23070558]
  17. J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Mar;55(3):908-913 [PMID: 28053217]
  18. Front Genet. 2021 Jul 28;12:711437 [PMID: 34394197]
  19. Nat Methods. 2022 Jul;19(7):823-826 [PMID: 35789207]
  20. J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Dec;53(12):3788-97 [PMID: 26400782]
  21. Nat Biotechnol. 2013 Apr;31(4):294-6 [PMID: 23563421]
  22. Can J Microbiol. 2024 May 1;70(5):178-189 [PMID: 38354391]
  23. Genome Res. 2017 May;27(5):737-746 [PMID: 28100585]
  24. Genome Res. 2018 Nov;28(11):1720-1732 [PMID: 30341161]
  25. Nat Protoc. 2017 Jun;12(6):1261-1276 [PMID: 28538739]
  26. Front Microbiol. 2019 Dec 17;10:2817 [PMID: 31921015]
  27. J Infect Dis. 2020 Mar 28;221(Suppl 3):S292-S307 [PMID: 31612214]
  28. J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Jul 19;59(8):e0009321 [PMID: 33980649]
  29. mSystems. 2024 Mar 19;9(3):e0094523 [PMID: 38376263]
  30. N Engl J Med. 2019 Dec 26;381(26):2569-2580 [PMID: 31881145]
  31. J Clin Microbiol. 2023 Apr 20;61(4):e0163122 [PMID: 36988494]
  32. Int J Mol Sci. 2023 May 26;24(11): [PMID: 37298280]
  33. Nat Med. 2021 Sep;27(9):1518-1524 [PMID: 34504335]
  34. Front Microbiol. 2021 May 28;12:649517 [PMID: 34220740]
  35. Nat Commun. 2020 Dec 9;11(1):6272 [PMID: 33298935]
  36. BMC Genomics. 2023 May 12;24(1):258 [PMID: 37173617]
  37. mSphere. 2020 Aug 19;5(4): [PMID: 32817379]
  38. Nat Rev Genet. 2018 Jan;19(1):9-20 [PMID: 29129921]
  39. Nat Microbiol. 2020 Nov;5(11):1403-1407 [PMID: 32669681]
  40. Nature. 2020 Mar;579(7798):265-269 [PMID: 32015508]

Grants

  1. DigLeben-5575/10-9/Ministry for Economics, Sciences and Digital Society of Thuringia (TMWWDG)

MeSH Term

Nanopore Sequencing
Reproducibility of Results
Bacteria
Humans
Genotyping Techniques
Genotype
Multilocus Sequence Typing
DNA, Bacterial
Genome, Bacterial
Sequence Analysis, DNA

Chemicals

DNA, Bacterial

Word Cloud

Similar Articles

Cited By