Virtual Surgical Planning and Customized Subperiosteal Implant for Reconstruction of Maxillary Defect After Oncological Resection.

Abdulsamet Kundak��io��lu, Eda Bilazero��lu, Yusuf Emes, B��ket Aybar
Author Information
  1. Abdulsamet Kundak��io��lu: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, ��stanbul University, ��stanbul, Turkey.

Abstract

Reconstructing defects after jaw tumor removal is difficult because of the complex facial skeleton, which affects patient nutrition and self-confidence. Traditional methods like iliac bone or fibula grafts take a long time and may raise aesthetic issues. Advancements in computer-aided three-dimensional (3D) modeling allow precise surgical planning, leading to more symmetrical reconstructions. Moreover, the application of custom-designed prostheses, similar to joint prostheses used in joint surgery, offers promising outcomes, particularly in cases involving the removal of the ramus and temporomandibular joint. A 28-year-old female had a maxillectomy for maxillary myxoma, using 3D-printed implants for reconstruction and dental rehabilitation. "Computer-Aided Design" software optimized implant coordination, reducing soft tissue pressure. Postoperative permanent dentures were successful with few complications. Compared with traditional methods, 3D-printed titanium plates improve patient satisfaction and reduce treatment time, particularly with sufficient soft tissue thickness, offering aesthetic benefits and eliminating extra surgeries for effective defect treatment.

References

  1. Garrido-Mart��nez P, Quispe-L��pez N, Montesdeoca-Garc��a N, et al. Maxillary reconstruction with subperiosteal implants in a cancer patient: a one-year follow-up. J Clin Exp Dent 2022;14:e293
  2. Melville JC, Manis CS, Shum JW, et al. Single-unit 3D-printed titanium reconstruction plate for maxillary reconstruction: the evolution of surgical reconstruction for maxillary defects���a case report and review of current techniques. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019;77:874. e1���e13
  3. Bluebond-Langner R, Rodriguez ED. Application of skeletal buttress analogy in composite facial reconstruction. Craniomaxillofacl Trauma Reconstr 2009;2:19���25
  4. Cebri��n Carretero JL, Del Castillo Pardo de Vera J, Montesdeoca Garc��a N, et al. Virtual surgical planning and customized subperiosteal titanium maxillary implant (CSTMI) for three-dimensional reconstruction and dental implants of maxillary defects after oncological resection: case series. J Clin Med 2022;11:4594
  5. Markiewicz MR, Farrell B, Shanti RM. Technology in oral and maxillofacial reconstruction. Peterson's Principles Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 4th edn. Springer; 2022:1455���532 532.
  6. Glas HH, Vosselman N, de Visscher SA. The use of 3D virtual surgical planning and computer-aided design in reconstruction of maxillary surgical defects. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020;28:122���8.

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0jointremovalpatientmethodstimeaestheticprosthesesparticularly3D-printedsofttissuetreatmentReconstructingdefectsjawtumordifficultcomplexfacialskeletonaffectsnutritionself-confidenceTraditionallikeiliacbonefibulagraftstakelongmayraiseissuesAdvancementscomputer-aidedthree-dimensional3DmodelingallowprecisesurgicalplanningleadingsymmetricalreconstructionsMoreoverapplicationcustom-designedsimilarusedsurgeryofferspromisingoutcomescasesinvolvingramustemporomandibular28-year-oldfemalemaxillectomymaxillarymyxomausingimplantsreconstructiondentalrehabilitation"Computer-AidedDesign"softwareoptimizedimplantcoordinationreducingpressurePostoperativepermanentdenturessuccessfulcomplicationsComparedtraditionaltitaniumplatesimprovesatisfactionreducesufficientthicknessofferingbenefitseliminatingextrasurgerieseffectivedefectVirtualSurgicalPlanningCustomizedSubperiostealImplantReconstructionMaxillaryDefectOncologicalResection

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.