Far behind 90-70-90's screening target: the prevalence and determinants of cervical cancer screening among Sub-Saharan African women: evidence from Demographic and Health Survey.

Aklilu Habte Hailegebireal, Habtamu Mellie Bizuayehu, Lire Lemma Tirore
Author Information
  1. Aklilu Habte Hailegebireal: School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wachemo University, Hosanna, Ethiopia. akliluhabte57@gmail.com.
  2. Habtamu Mellie Bizuayehu: School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
  3. Lire Lemma Tirore: College of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Department of Health Informatics, Wachemo University, Hosanna, Ethiopia.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer screening is the primary goal in 90-70-90 targets to reduce cervical cancer incidence and mortality by identifying and treating women with precancerous lesions. Although several studies have been conducted in Sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries on cervical cancer screening, their coverage was limited to the regional or national level, and/or did not address individual- and community-level determinants, with existing evidence gaps to the wider SSA region using the most recent data. Hence, this study aimed to assess the pooled prevalence and multilevel correlates of cervical cancer screening among women with SSA.
METHODS: This study was conducted using the Demographic Health Survey data (2015-2022) from 11 countries, and a total weighted sample of 124,787 women was considered in the analysis. Using multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression, the influence of each factor on cervical cancer screening uptake was investigated, and significant predictors were reported using the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) with their respective 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).
RESULTS: The overall weighted prevalence of cervical cancer screening was 10.29 (95% CI: 7.77, 11.26), with the highest and lowest screening rates detected in Namibia and Benin at 39.3% (95% CI: 38.05, 40.54) and 0.5% (95% CI: 0.36, 0.69), respectively. Higher cervical screening uptake was observed among women aged 35-49 [aOR = 4.11; 95% CI: 3.69, 4.58] compared to 15-24 years, attending higher education [aOR = 2.71; 95% CI: 2.35, 3.23] than no formal education, being in the richest wealth quintile [aOR = 1.45; 95% CI: 1.26, 1.67], having a recent visit to a health facility [aOR = 1.83; 95% CI: 1.71, 1.95], using contraception [aOR = 1.54; 95% CI: 1.45, 1.64], recent sexual activity [aOR = 3.59; 95% CI: 2.97, 4.34], and listening to the radio [aOR = 1.78; 95%CI: 1.60, 2.15].
CONCLUSION: The overall prevalence of cervical cancer screening in SSA countries was found to be low; only one in every ten women has been screened. Strengthening universal health coverage, and promoting screening programs with an emphasis on rural areas and low socioeconomic status are key to improving screening rates and equity. Additionally, integrating cervical cancer screening with existing reproductive health programs, e.g. contraceptive service would be important.

Keywords

References

  1. Glob Public Health. 2013;8(7):784-95 [PMID: 23914758]
  2. Cancer Epidemiol. 2021 Jun;72:101930 [PMID: 33756434]
  3. Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Sep;88(3):383-6 [PMID: 8752244]
  4. Midwifery. 2020 Nov;90:102816 [PMID: 32823256]
  5. J Community Health. 2015 Aug;40(4):756-61 [PMID: 25677728]
  6. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Feb;28(1):4-10 [PMID: 26642063]
  7. Int J Epidemiol. 2010 Jun;39(3):757-65 [PMID: 20176587]
  8. Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Feb;8(2):e191-e203 [PMID: 31812369]
  9. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2018 Mar 11;2018:3712948 [PMID: 29713347]
  10. Public Health. 2021 Jun;195:105-111 [PMID: 34082174]
  11. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2020 Feb 07;2020:2805936 [PMID: 32089698]
  12. J Natl Med Assoc. 2020 Apr;112(2):229-232 [PMID: 32278478]
  13. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48834 [PMID: 23155413]
  14. Cancer Epidemiol. 2021 Oct;74:101995 [PMID: 34416545]
  15. Prev Med. 2015 Dec;81:281-9 [PMID: 26408405]
  16. Implement Sci. 2018 Feb 9;13(1):28 [PMID: 29426344]
  17. J Rural Health. 2022 Mar;38(2):409-415 [PMID: 34506669]
  18. J Cancer Educ. 2018 Apr;33(2):404-416 [PMID: 27896666]
  19. Cancer Nurs. 2010 Nov-Dec;33(6):445-53 [PMID: 20697268]
  20. JAMA. 2020 Oct 20;324(15):1532-1542 [PMID: 33079153]
  21. Int J Equity Health. 2020 Mar 26;19(1):42 [PMID: 32216799]
  22. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Sep;134(3):239-46 [PMID: 27350227]
  23. PLoS One. 2023 Sep 8;18(9):e0291110 [PMID: 37683011]
  24. Prev Med Rep. 2018 Feb 02;9:124-130 [PMID: 29527465]
  25. J Public Health Afr. 2015 Aug 17;6(2):484 [PMID: 28299143]
  26. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2019 Apr;35(2):166-174 [PMID: 30878194]
  27. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017 May;26(5):403-412 [PMID: 28513340]
  28. BMJ. 2018 Dec 7;363:k4602 [PMID: 30530626]
  29. Prev Med. 2018 Sep;114:205-208 [PMID: 30031013]
  30. BMC Womens Health. 2023 Jun 26;23(1):337 [PMID: 37365552]
  31. Int J Cancer. 2024 Apr 15;154(8):1377-1393 [PMID: 38059753]
  32. PLoS One. 2014 Nov 11;9(11):e111557 [PMID: 25387105]
  33. Pan Afr Med J. 2020 Jun 16;36:97 [PMID: 32774656]
  34. BMC Womens Health. 2021 Oct 26;21(1):371 [PMID: 34702222]

MeSH Term

Humans
Female
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
Early Detection of Cancer
Adult
Middle Aged
Prevalence
Africa South of the Sahara
Young Adult
Health Surveys
Adolescent
Aged
Socioeconomic Factors
Mass Screening

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0screening95%cancercervicalCI:1womenSSAusingprevalence[aOR = 1Sub-Saharancountriesrecentamong1102healthCervicalconductedAfricancoveragedeterminantsexistingevidencedatastudymultilevelDemographicHealthSurveyweighteduptakeoverall26rates546934education7145lowprogramsBACKGROUND:primarygoal90-70-90targetsreduceincidencemortalityidentifyingtreatingprecancerouslesionsAlthoughseveralstudieslimitedregionalnationalleveland/oraddressindividual-community-levelgapswiderregionHenceaimedassesspooledcorrelatesMETHODS:2015-2022totalsample124787consideredanalysisUsingmixed-effectslogisticregressioninfluencefactorinvestigatedsignificantpredictorsreportedadjustedoddsratioaORrespectiveconfidenceintervalsCIRESULTS:1029777highestlowestdetectedNamibiaBenin393%3805405%36respectivelyHigherobservedaged35-49[aOR = 458]compared15-24yearsattendinghigher[aOR = 23523]formalrichestwealthquintile67]visitfacility8395]contraception64]sexualactivity[aOR = 3599734]listeningradio7895%CI:6015]CONCLUSION:foundoneeverytenscreenedStrengtheninguniversalpromotingemphasisruralareassocioeconomicstatuskeyimprovingequityAdditionallyintegratingreproductiveegcontraceptiveserviceimportantFarbehind90-70-90'starget:women:DeterminantsScreeningAfrica

Similar Articles

Cited By