Reverse Engineering Orthognathic Surgery and Orthodontics in Individuals with Cleft Lip and/or Palate: A Case Report.

Jaemin Ko, Mark M Urata, Jeffrey A Hammoudeh, Dennis-Duke Yamashita, Stephen L-K Yen
Author Information
  1. Jaemin Ko: Craniofacial and Special Care Orthodontics, Division of Dentistry, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90027, USA.
  2. Mark M Urata: Division of Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90027, USA.
  3. Jeffrey A Hammoudeh: Division of Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90027, USA.
  4. Dennis-Duke Yamashita: Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90027, USA.
  5. Stephen L-K Yen: Craniofacial and Special Care Orthodontics, Division of Dentistry, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90027, USA.

Abstract

This case report presents a virtual treatment simulation of the orthodontic treatment and surgery-first orthognathic surgery employed to treat a patient with a repaired unilateral cleft lip and alveolus with Class III malocclusion and lower third facial asymmetry. The patient exhibited a negative overjet of 9 mm, a missing lower right second premolar, and a 5 mm gap between the upper right central and lateral incisors with midline discrepancy. The three-dimensional virtual planning began with virtual pre-surgical orthodontics, followed by the positioning of the facial bones and teeth in their ideal aesthetic and functional positions. The sequence of steps needed to achieve this outcome was then reverse-engineered and recorded using multiplatform Nemostudio software (Nemotec, Madrid, Spain), which facilitated both surgical and orthodontic planning. The treatment included a two-piece segmental maxillary osteotomy for dental space closure, a LeFort I maxillary advancement, and a mandibular setback with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy to correct the skeletal underbite and asymmetry. A novel approach was employed by pre-treating the patient for orthognathic surgeries at age 11, seven years prior to the surgery. This early phase of orthodontic treatment aligned the patient's teeth and established the dental arch form. The positions of the teeth were maintained with retainers, eliminating the need for pre-surgical orthodontics later. This early phase of treatment significantly reduced the treatment time. The use of software to predict all the necessary steps for surgery and post-surgical orthodontic tooth movements made this approach possible. Multi-step virtual planning can be a powerful tool for analyzing complex craniofacial problems that require multidisciplinary care, such as cleft lip and/or palate.

Keywords

References

  1. J Pers Med. 2022 Dec 19;12(12): [PMID: 36556309]
  2. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997 Jul;55(7):694-7; discussion 697-8 [PMID: 9216501]
  3. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Oct;146(4):847-858 [PMID: 32970007]
  4. Korean J Orthod. 2014 Nov;44(6):330-41 [PMID: 25473649]
  5. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2019 Feb;56(2):159-167 [PMID: 29702006]
  6. Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Jul;24(7):2385-2393 [PMID: 31720852]
  7. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2010 Jul;47(4):413-20 [PMID: 20590463]
  8. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005 Mar;42(2):121-7 [PMID: 15748102]
  9. J Craniofac Surg. 2023 Mar-Apr 01;34(2):656-657 [PMID: 36184762]
  10. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Nov;144(5):748-58 [PMID: 24182591]
  11. Int J Oral Sci. 2015 Mar 23;7(1):14-7 [PMID: 25394591]
  12. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017 Sep;45(9):1419-1424 [PMID: 28800842]
  13. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2023 Nov 30;:10556656231216833 [PMID: 38037271]
  14. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020 Jul;57(7):872-876 [PMID: 31896277]
  15. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2024 Feb 28;:10556656241228903 [PMID: 38414427]
  16. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Mar;69(3):771-80 [PMID: 21257249]
  17. J Clin Med. 2020 Jun 12;9(6): [PMID: 32545621]
  18. J Orthod. 2021 Mar;48(1):52-63 [PMID: 32988276]
  19. Angle Orthod. 1992 Winter;62(4):283-90 [PMID: 1456475]
  20. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Feb;43(1):23-28 [PMID: 28280706]
  21. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Nov;75(11):2441.e1-2441.e13 [PMID: 28826784]
  22. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2017 Jun;20 Suppl 1:129-133 [PMID: 28643931]
  23. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Jun 30;9(6):2621-2625 [PMID: 32984097]
  24. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Oct;60(8):1092-1096 [PMID: 35835610]
  25. Angle Orthod. 2008 Jul;78(4):662-9 [PMID: 18302465]
  26. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1994 Jul;31(4):295-308 [PMID: 7918525]
  27. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Jul;48(7):930-940 [PMID: 30685226]
  28. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2017 May;54(3):309-320 [PMID: 27031269]
  29. Clin Plast Surg. 2004 Apr;31(2):315-30 [PMID: 15145672]
  30. Head Neck. 2024 Jun;46(6):1322-1330 [PMID: 38545772]
  31. Head Face Med. 2020 Dec 4;16(1):34 [PMID: 33272289]
  32. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Dec 18;45(1):42 [PMID: 38108939]
  33. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Feb 8;125(6):101795 [PMID: 38340958]
  34. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 Jun;151(6):1048-1057 [PMID: 28554450]
  35. J Oral Implantol. 2012 Dec;38(6):779-91 [PMID: 21728818]
  36. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1992 Apr;20(3):111-8 [PMID: 1530723]
  37. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Nov;146(5):612-9 [PMID: 25439212]
  38. J Clin Orthod. 2009 Feb;43(2):97-105 [PMID: 19276579]
  39. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2007 Jul;44(4):396-401 [PMID: 17608550]
  40. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1989 Dec;17 Suppl 1:17-9 [PMID: 2691528]
  41. J Craniofac Surg. 2015 Oct;26(7):2086-93 [PMID: 26468790]
  42. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Sep;45(9):1065-9 [PMID: 27102289]
  43. J Craniofac Surg. 2010 Mar;21(2):332-8 [PMID: 20186090]
  44. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Nov;60(9):1184-1191 [PMID: 36030091]
  45. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2014 Jan;51(1):e1-e10 [PMID: 23237432]
  46. J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 06;11(7): [PMID: 35407667]
  47. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2010 Dec;88(12):1008-16 [PMID: 20878909]
  48. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2018 Aug;126(2):107-116 [PMID: 29631986]
  49. Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon). 2023 Dec;28(1):2271160 [PMID: 37862041]
  50. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2009 Sep;46(5):498-502 [PMID: 19929100]
  51. Clin Plast Surg. 2019 Apr;46(2):157-171 [PMID: 30851748]
  52. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2012 Mar;49(2):194-200 [PMID: 21740173]
  53. Semin Orthod. 1997 Dec;3(4):265-74 [PMID: 9573888]
  54. J Craniofac Surg. 2020 Oct;31(7):1900-1905 [PMID: 32604283]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0treatmentvirtualplanningorthodonticsurgeryorthognathicpatientcleftliporthodonticsteethapproachand/orsurgery-firstemployedlowerfacialasymmetrymmrightthree-dimensionalpre-surgicalpositionsstepssoftwaresurgicalmaxillaryosteotomydentalearlyphasepalatecasereportpresentssimulationtreatrepairedunilateralalveolusClassIIImalocclusionthirdexhibitednegativeoverjet9missingsecondpremolar5gapuppercentrallateralincisorsmidlinediscrepancybeganfollowedpositioningbonesidealaestheticfunctionalsequenceneededachieveoutcomereverse-engineeredrecordedusingmultiplatformNemostudioNemotecMadridSpainfacilitatedincludedtwo-piecesegmentalspaceclosureLeFortadvancementmandibularsetbackbilateralsagittalsplitcorrectskeletalunderbitenovelpre-treatingsurgeriesage11sevenyearsprioralignedpatient'sestablishedarchformmaintainedretainerseliminatingneedlatersignificantlyreducedtimeusepredictnecessarypost-surgicaltoothmovementsmadepossibleMulti-stepcanpowerfultoolanalyzingcomplexcraniofacialproblemsrequiremultidisciplinarycareReverseEngineeringOrthognathicSurgeryOrthodonticsIndividualsCleftLipPalate:CaseReport

Similar Articles

Cited By