Using nicotine replacement therapy for smoking reduction in pregnancy: a qualitative study of pregnant women in the UK who smoke.

Ross Thomson, Lucy Phillips, Sophie Orton, Felix Naughton, Tim Coleman
Author Information
  1. Ross Thomson: Lifespan and Population Health, University of Nottingham School of Medicine, Nottingham, UK Ross.Thomson1@nottingham.ac.uk. ORCID
  2. Lucy Phillips: Lifespan and Population Health, University of Nottingham School of Medicine, Nottingham, UK.
  3. Sophie Orton: Lifespan and Population Health, University of Nottingham School of Medicine, Nottingham, UK. ORCID
  4. Felix Naughton: School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwich, UK. ORCID
  5. Tim Coleman: Lifespan and Population Health, University of Nottingham School of Medicine, Nottingham, UK.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To explore the acceptability and perceived motivations and barriers of using nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) to reduce the number of daily cigarettes smoked in pregnancy, rather than for stopping completely.
DESIGN: Telephone, semi-structured interviews, audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were analysed using an inductive thematic analysis.
PARTICIPANTS: Eighteen pregnant women in the UK, who were smoking or had recently stopped smoking, were recruited.
RESULTS: Half of interviewees reported having used NRT to reduce smoking during their current pregnancy, and there was overwhelming support for the UK National Health Service to recognise this as a potentially useful way to use these products. The cost and stigma associated with purchasing NRT products when pregnant were seen as barriers to using NRT in this way. The early offer of NRT for reduction along with a tailored, structured approach to support was seen as important.
CONCLUSIONS: Using NRT to help women, who are unable to stop smoking, to reduce their smoking may be acceptable to pregnant women. This study found women were already using NRT alongside ad hoc strategies to reduce their smoking. Further research evaluating structured smoking reduction support, alongside concurrent NRT use is needed.

Keywords

References

  1. Am J Psychiatry. 2003 Nov;160(11):1985-9 [PMID: 14594745]
  2. Health Technol Assess. 2008 Feb;12(2):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-135 [PMID: 18093448]
  3. Health Soc Care Community. 2014 May;22(3):259-67 [PMID: 24224830]
  4. Addiction. 2022 Mar;117(3):751-759 [PMID: 34427009]
  5. Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Jul;6(7):e769-e776 [PMID: 29859815]
  6. BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 15;7(11):e018746 [PMID: 29146659]
  7. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 14;2:CD001055 [PMID: 28196405]
  8. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 May;18(5):906-12 [PMID: 26391578]
  9. BMC Public Health. 2016 Mar 31;16:290 [PMID: 27030251]
  10. Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 24;7:37 [PMID: 22530986]
  11. Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1753-1760 [PMID: 26613970]
  12. Prev Med. 2005 Jan;40(1):10-5 [PMID: 15530575]
  13. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Aug 28;19(8):e290 [PMID: 28851679]
  14. PLoS One. 2023 Feb 3;18(2):e0280805 [PMID: 36735735]
  15. Nicotine Tob Res. 2002;4 Suppl 2:S183-8 [PMID: 12573179]
  16. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2017 Dec;27(1):2 [PMID: 28108747]
  17. Addiction. 2021 Feb;116(2):239-277 [PMID: 32621526]
  18. Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Jun 12;22(7):1178-1186 [PMID: 31570944]
  19. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Feb;233:6-11 [PMID: 30529257]
  20. Women Birth. 2015 Mar;28(1):8-15 [PMID: 25438715]
  21. Addiction. 2023 Nov;118(11):2076-2092 [PMID: 37394704]
  22. Obstet Gynecol. 1997 May;89(5 Pt 1):648-53 [PMID: 9166294]
  23. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 22;16(10): [PMID: 31121850]
  24. Br J Health Psychol. 2021 Feb;26(1):179-197 [PMID: 32860647]
  25. Women Birth. 2020 Feb;33(1):70-76 [PMID: 30553588]
  26. Nicotine Tob Res. 2004 Apr;6 Suppl 2:S125-40 [PMID: 15203816]
  27. Prev Med Rep. 2016 Sep 07;4:481-5 [PMID: 27635381]
  28. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57 [PMID: 17872937]
  29. Addiction. 2019 Mar;114(3):406-424 [PMID: 30315598]
  30. Nicotine Tob Res. 2012 Jul;14(7):849-56 [PMID: 22193570]
  31. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012 Feb;1248:107-23 [PMID: 22092035]
  32. Health Educ Q. 1995 May;22(2):190-200 [PMID: 7622387]
  33. Prev Med. 2001 Apr;32(4):313-20 [PMID: 11304092]
  34. Int J Epidemiol. 2018 Aug 1;47(4):1141-1150 [PMID: 29947760]
  35. Nicotine Tob Res. 2001 Feb;3(1):71-6 [PMID: 11260813]
  36. Implement Sci. 2011 Apr 23;6:42 [PMID: 21513547]
  37. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2018 Feb;36(1):1-3 [PMID: 29517295]
  38. Nicotine Tob Res. 2002;4 Suppl 2:S73-9 [PMID: 12573169]
  39. Addiction. 2019 Sep;114(9):1651-1658 [PMID: 31106486]
  40. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 4;3:CD010078 [PMID: 32129504]
  41. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 29;16(23): [PMID: 31795347]
  42. Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1802-1811 [PMID: 27340178]

MeSH Term

Humans
Female
Pregnancy
Adult
Qualitative Research
United Kingdom
Tobacco Use Cessation Devices
Smoking Cessation
Motivation
Smoking Reduction
Pregnant People
Young Adult
Pregnancy Complications
Interviews as Topic
Smoking
Nicotine Replacement Therapy

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0NRTsmokingwomenpregnantusingreduceUKsupportreductionbarriersnicotinereplacementtherapypregnancywayuseproductsseenstructuredUsingstudyalongsideresearchqualitativeOBJECTIVES:exploreacceptabilityperceivedmotivationsnumberdailycigarettessmokedratherstoppingcompletelyDESIGN:Telephonesemi-structuredinterviewsaudio-recordedtranscribedverbatimTranscriptsanalysedinductivethematicanalysisPARTICIPANTS:EighteenrecentlystoppedrecruitedRESULTS:HalfintervieweesreportedusedcurrentoverwhelmingNationalHealthServicerecognisepotentiallyusefulcoststigmaassociatedpurchasingearlyofferalongtailoredapproachimportantCONCLUSIONS:helpunablestopmayacceptablefoundalreadyadhocstrategiesevaluatingconcurrentneededpregnancy:smokebehaviorprimarycarepublichealth

Similar Articles

Cited By