Decentralized Clinical Trials in Early Drug Development-A Framework Proposal.

Diogo J Silva, Blessie Elizabeth Nelson, Jordi Rodon
Author Information
  1. Diogo J Silva: Local Health Unity of Matosinhos - Hospital Pedro Hispano, Matosinhos, Portugal. ORCID
  2. Blessie Elizabeth Nelson: Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  3. Jordi Rodon: Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a rethinking of clinical trial design to maintain clinical research activity, with regulatory changes allowing for the wider implementation and development of decentralized design models. Evidence of the feasibility and benefits associated with a remote design comes mainly from observational studies or phase 2 and 3 clinical trials, in which implementation is easier with a better-established safety profile. Early drug development is a slow and expensive process in which accrual and safety are key aspects of success. Applying a decentralized model to phase 1 clinical trials could improve patient accrual by removing geographic barriers, improving patient population diversity, strengthening evidence for rare tumors, and reducing patients' financial and logistical burdens. However, safety monitoring, data quality, shipment, and administration of the investigational product are challenges to its implementation. Based on published data for decentralized clinical trials, we propose an exploratory framework of solutions to enable the conceptualization of a decentralized model for phase 1 clinical trials.

Keywords

References

  1. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2018 Dec;2:1-12 [PMID: 30652584]
  2. NPJ Digit Med. 2022 May 5;5(1):58 [PMID: 35513479]
  3. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Mar;89(3):1187-1197 [PMID: 36199201]
  4. Sci Rep. 2018 Sep 18;8(1):13978 [PMID: 30228363]
  5. Trials. 2022 Oct 27;23(1):905 [PMID: 36303217]
  6. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2016 Nov;5(6):528-537 [PMID: 27365164]
  7. BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Nov 21;23(1):117 [PMID: 36414962]
  8. Bioanalysis. 2021 Aug;13(15):1195-1203 [PMID: 34275327]
  9. PLoS One. 2021 Sep 2;16(9):e0255841 [PMID: 34473717]
  10. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Mar 1;111(3):245-255 [PMID: 30856272]
  11. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2019 Jan;25(1):140-147 [PMID: 28942724]
  12. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2016;35:185-98 [PMID: 27249699]
  13. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2018 May 23;38:540-545 [PMID: 30231354]
  14. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2022 Dec;180:103869 [PMID: 36356701]
  15. Br J Cancer. 2013 Sep 17;109(6):1549-55 [PMID: 23989945]
  16. PLOS Digit Health. 2023 Jan 26;2(1):e0000178 [PMID: 36812616]
  17. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Apr 10;41(11):2020-2028 [PMID: 36480773]
  18. JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 Sep;17(9):546-564 [PMID: 34319760]
  19. J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Mar;58(3):294-303 [PMID: 29136283]
  20. Mol Genet Metab. 2017 Jan - Feb;120(1-2):111-115 [PMID: 27614581]
  21. J Appl Lab Med. 2023 May 4;8(3):535-550 [PMID: 36533519]
  22. Health Informatics J. 2020 Dec;26(4):3163-3183 [PMID: 32744128]
  23. Trials. 2022 Dec 12;23(1):1000 [PMID: 36510214]
  24. Front Pharmacol. 2021 Nov 23;12:764379 [PMID: 34887763]
  25. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Feb 20;37(6):448-452 [PMID: 30625041]
  26. Cancer. 2021 Dec 01;127(23):4464-4469 [PMID: 34379799]
  27. J Immunother Cancer. 2020 Nov;8(2): [PMID: 33199512]
  28. Nat Med. 2022 Apr;28(4):809-813 [PMID: 35228753]
  29. Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 16;11:1188304 [PMID: 37397724]
  30. Cancer Med. 2022 Sep;11(17):3342-3351 [PMID: 35373512]
  31. Br J Cancer. 2003 Dec 15;89(12):2190-6 [PMID: 14676793]
  32. Bioanalysis. 2020 Jul;12(13):919-935 [PMID: 32686955]
  33. Nat Commun. 2021 Jan 4;12(1):113 [PMID: 33397956]
  34. Nat Med. 2020 Dec;26(12):1810 [PMID: 33230340]
  35. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2021 Apr 27;6(4):384-387 [PMID: 33997523]
  36. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2016;35:e89-96 [PMID: 27249775]
  37. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jan 10;41(2):181-185 [PMID: 35994691]
  38. Nat Commun. 2019 Feb 22;10(1):917 [PMID: 30796226]
  39. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 May 25;9:906448 [PMID: 35692551]
  40. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jul 31;12(8): [PMID: 36010206]
  41. Trials. 2009 Nov 04;10:100 [PMID: 19889222]
  42. Trials. 2023 Feb 21;24(1):127 [PMID: 36810093]
  43. Blood. 2010 Jun 10;115(23):4651-6 [PMID: 20299511]
  44. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Jul;106(1):25-27 [PMID: 31013350]
  45. Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Mar-Apr;26(2):w181-91 [PMID: 17259202]
  46. Health Technol (Berl). 2022;12(2):359-364 [PMID: 35308032]
  47. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2022 Jan;6:e2100126 [PMID: 35025669]
  48. Clin Trials. 2016 Dec;13(6):665-670 [PMID: 27371945]
  49. Clin Transl Sci. 2022 Dec;15(12):2785-2795 [PMID: 36129129]
  50. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2021 Sep;55(5):1059-1065 [PMID: 34097288]
  51. BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Feb 27;22(1):18 [PMID: 33639926]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0clinicaldecentralizedtrialsphasedesignimplementationdevelopmentsafety1EarlydrugaccrualmodelpatientdataCOVID-19pandemicledrethinkingtrialmaintainresearchactivityregulatorychangesallowingwidermodelsEvidencefeasibilitybenefitsassociatedremotecomesmainlyobservationalstudies23easierbetter-establishedprofileslowexpensiveprocesskeyaspectssuccessApplyingimproveremovinggeographicbarriersimprovingpopulationdiversitystrengtheningevidenceraretumorsreducingpatients'financiallogisticalburdensHowevermonitoringqualityshipmentadministrationinvestigationalproductchallengesBasedpublishedproposeexploratoryframeworksolutionsenableconceptualizationDecentralizedClinicalTrialsDrugDevelopment-AFrameworkProposal

Similar Articles

Cited By