Geographic Variation in Personality is Associated With Fertility Across the United States.

Eleanor J Junkins, Joseph E Potter, Peter J Rentfrow, Samuel D Gosling, Jeff Potter, K Paige Harden, Elliot M Tucker-Drob, Jaime Derringer, Daniel A Briley
Author Information
  1. Eleanor J Junkins: Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA. ORCID
  2. Joseph E Potter: Department of Sociology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA. ORCID
  3. Peter J Rentfrow: Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom. ORCID
  4. Samuel D Gosling: Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA. ORCID
  5. Jeff Potter: Atof, Cambridge, USA. ORCID
  6. K Paige Harden: Population Research Center, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA. ORCID
  7. Elliot M Tucker-Drob: Population Research Center, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA. ORCID
  8. Jaime Derringer: Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA. ORCID
  9. Daniel A Briley: Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA. ORCID

Abstract

Levels of fertility and the shape of the age-specific fertility schedule vary substantially across U.S. regions with some states having peak fertility relatively early and others relatively late. Structural institutions or economic factors partly explain these heterogeneous patterns, but regional differences in personality might also contribute to regional differences in fertility. Here, we evaluated whether variation in extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience measured at the U.S. state-level was associated with the level, timing, and context of fertility across states above and beyond sociodemographics, voting behavior, and religiosity. Generally, states with higher levels of agreeableness and conscientiousness had more traditional fertility patterns, and states with higher levels of neuroticism and openness had more nontraditional fertility patterns, even after controlling for established correlates of fertility (r ~ |.50|). Personality is an overlooked correlate that can be leveraged to understand the existence and persistence of fertility differentials.

Keywords

References

  1. Hum Reprod Update. 2011 Nov-Dec;17(6):848-60 [PMID: 21652599]
  2. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2011 Mar;43(1):41-50 [PMID: 21388504]
  3. Psychol Sci. 2008 Apr;19(4):309-13 [PMID: 18399880]
  4. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2011 Jun;43(2):78-87 [PMID: 21651706]
  5. J Marriage Fam. 2020 Feb;82(1):9-34 [PMID: 32612304]
  6. NCHS Data Brief. 2009 Aug;(21):1-8 [PMID: 19674536]
  7. Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Oct;1(10):757-765 [PMID: 29051922]
  8. Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Dec;1(12):890-895 [PMID: 31024181]
  9. J Pers. 2003 Aug;71(4):495-513 [PMID: 12901429]
  10. Demography. 2003 Nov;40(4):589-603 [PMID: 14686132]
  11. Behav Genet. 2017 Jan;47(1):36-51 [PMID: 27522223]
  12. Psychol Bull. 2014 Sep;140(5):1303-31 [PMID: 24956122]
  13. Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Nov;4(11):1135-1144 [PMID: 32895542]
  14. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Jan;96(1):218-30 [PMID: 19210076]
  15. J Evol Biol. 2009 Aug;22(8):1599-607 [PMID: 19555442]
  16. J Soc Psychol. 2010 Sep-Oct;150(5):540-59 [PMID: 21058579]
  17. Psychol Sci. 2013 Dec;24(12):2530-40 [PMID: 24142813]
  18. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2021 Aug;121(2):378-393 [PMID: 32597669]
  19. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Jun;82(6):903-18 [PMID: 12051579]
  20. J Pers. 2007 Oct;75(5):1051-70 [PMID: 17760857]
  21. J Pers. 2013 Oct;81(5):487-98 [PMID: 22925070]
  22. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 16;109(42):16980-5 [PMID: 23027933]
  23. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Jul;89(1):90-106 [PMID: 16060748]
  24. Nat Commun. 2019 Jun 3;10(1):2405 [PMID: 31160560]
  25. AJS. 2014 Jan;119(4):1002-46 [PMID: 25032268]
  26. J Pers. 2018 Feb;86(1):83-96 [PMID: 27716921]
  27. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008 Sep;3(5):339-69 [PMID: 26158954]
  28. Ecol Lett. 2013 Nov;16(11):1365-72 [PMID: 24047530]
  29. Behav Res Methods. 2008 May;40(2):457-66 [PMID: 18522056]
  30. Biometrika. 1950 Jun;37(1-2):17-23 [PMID: 15420245]
  31. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Dec;105(6):996-1012 [PMID: 24128185]
  32. Am Psychol. 2004 Feb-Mar;59(2):93-104 [PMID: 14992636]
  33. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Dec 23;111(51):18112-5 [PMID: 25453112]
  34. Demography. 1992 May;29(2):265-85 [PMID: 1607052]
  35. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 22;109(21):8044-9 [PMID: 22547810]
  36. Psychol Bull. 2014 Mar;140(2):434-65 [PMID: 23855958]
  37. Soc Work Health Care. 2011;50(9):682-93 [PMID: 21985110]
  38. J Res Pers. 2018 Feb;72:64-72 [PMID: 32831424]
  39. Psychol Sci. 2012 Aug 1;23(8):835-41 [PMID: 22722269]
  40. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Jul;105(1):104-22 [PMID: 23586410]
  41. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2115530 [PMID: 34228128]
  42. Science. 2014 Oct 31;346(6209):587-91 [PMID: 25359967]
  43. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020 Sep;15(5):1243-1255 [PMID: 32727292]
  44. Popul Res Policy Rev. 2017 Dec;36(6):903-928 [PMID: 29531423]
  45. J Abnorm Psychol. 2003 Nov;112(4):558-77 [PMID: 14674869]
  46. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018 Nov;115(5):903-927 [PMID: 29154557]
  47. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2012 Aug 28;61(1):1-72 [PMID: 24974589]
  48. Psychol Sci. 2000 Nov;11(6):446-53 [PMID: 11202488]

Grants

  1. P2C HD042849/NICHD NIH HHS
  2. R01 HD083613/NICHD NIH HHS
  3. R01 HD092548/NICHD NIH HHS