Cross-lagged analysis of social support, physical activity behavior, and family relationships among university students.

Xielin Zhou, Mu Zhang, Bo Li, Shasha Ma
Author Information
  1. Xielin Zhou: School of Sports Training, Chengdu Sport University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
  2. Mu Zhang: School of Sports Training, Chengdu Sport University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
  3. Bo Li: Information Technology Centre, Chengdu Sport University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
  4. Shasha Ma: School of Graduate Education, Shandong Sport University, Jinan, Shandong, China.

Abstract

Objective: To explore the causal relationship between social support, physical activity behavior, and family relationships among university students.
Methods: Using the Social Support Rating Scale, the Physical Activity Behavior Self-Assessment Scale, and the Family Relationships Scale, a longitudinal follow-up survey was conducted on 412 college students in Sichuan Province at 2-month intervals in March 2024 (T1) and May 2024 (T2), to analyze the interaction mechanisms between college students' social support, physical activity behaviors, and family relationships through cross-lagging.
Results: (1) There are significant gender differences in social support, physical activity behavior, and family relationships among college students. Among the cross-lagged paths found, except for the path from T1 social support to T2 family relationships (β: 0.40 > 0.21), all other cross-lagged paths are smaller for female college students compared to male college students; (2) T1 social support was able to positively predict T2 physical activity behaviors (β = 0.50, < 0.001), and T1 physical activity behavior can also positively predict T2 social support (β = 0.18, < 0.01), but the path value T1 social support → T2 physical activity behavior is larger than T1 physical activity behavior → T2 social support. Therefore, social support is a causal variable for physical activity behavior; (3) T1 social support positively predicts T2 family relationships (β = 0.26, < 0.001); (4) T1 family relationships positively predict T2 physical activity behavior (β = 0.30, < 0.001). (5) Physical activity behavior is a mediating variable between family relationships and social support, with a mediating effect size of 0.054.
Conclusion: There are gender differences in social support, physical activity behavior, and family relationships among college students; there is a longitudinal causal relationship between social support, physical activity behavior, and family relationships; social support is a causal variable of physical activity behavior, and social support is also a causal variable of family relationships, and family relationships are the Social support is a causal variable for physical activity behavior, social support is also a causal variable for family relations, and family relations are a causal variable for physical activity behavior, which has a partially mediating role in family relations and social support.

Keywords

References

  1. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 27;19(11): [PMID: 35682107]
  2. Nurs Crit Care. 2020 Mar;25(2):102-108 [PMID: 31197904]
  3. Fam Process. 1979 Mar;18(1):3-28 [PMID: 437067]
  4. J Behav Med. 2016 Aug;39(4):610-23 [PMID: 27055818]
  5. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Jun 16;17(1):74 [PMID: 32539730]
  6. Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 12;13:1015921 [PMID: 36710813]
  7. Front Psychol. 2018 Apr 27;9:509 [PMID: 29755380]
  8. Compr Psychiatry. 1966 Oct;7(5):345-74 [PMID: 5922263]
  9. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Apr 27;14(1):56 [PMID: 28449673]
  10. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 18;19(20): [PMID: 36294043]
  11. Int J Transgend Health. 2021 Mar 18;22(4):425-439 [PMID: 37808529]
  12. Am J Psychiatry. 2018 Jul 1;175(7):631-648 [PMID: 29690792]
  13. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2015 May;19(2):113-47 [PMID: 25125368]
  14. Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2014 Nov;6(3):300-17 [PMID: 24989147]
  15. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Jul;43(7):1334-59 [PMID: 21694556]
  16. Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 10;13:940747 [PMID: 36033040]
  17. Health Educ Behav. 2004 Apr;31(2):143-64 [PMID: 15090118]
  18. BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 13;22(1):738 [PMID: 35418043]
  19. Front Psychol. 2022 May 16;13:841160 [PMID: 35651580]
  20. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 Jul 26;9:88 [PMID: 22835155]
  21. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Jul;53(1):94-103 [PMID: 3612495]
  22. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jan 22;15(1): [PMID: 29361761]
  23. Health Educ Behav. 2010 Oct;37(5):621-44 [PMID: 20729347]
  24. Psychosom Med. 1976 Sep-Oct;38(5):300-14 [PMID: 981490]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0supportsocialactivityphysicalfamilybehaviorrelationships0causalstudentsT1T2collegevariableamongpositivelyβ=<Scalepredict001alsomediatingrelationsrelationshipuniversitySocialPhysicallongitudinal2024behaviorscross-lagginggenderdifferencescross-laggedpathspathObjective:exploreMethods:UsingSupportRatingActivityBehaviorSelf-AssessmentFamilyRelationshipsfollow-upsurveyconducted412SichuanProvince2-monthintervalsMarchMayanalyzeinteractionmechanismsstudents'Results:1significantAmongfoundexceptβ:40>21smallerfemalecomparedmale2able50can1801valuelargerTherefore3predicts264305effectsize054Conclusion:partiallyroleCross-laggedanalysis

Similar Articles

Cited By