Online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study among final year medical students at the University of Zambia.

Anthony Nsamba Limbumbu, Jane Chanda Kabwe, Andrew Kumwenda, Phyllis Chibuye Kasonkomona, Grace Mwila, Mwansa Ketty Lubeya
Author Information
  1. Anthony Nsamba Limbumbu: Young Emerging Scientists Zambia, Lusaka, Lusaka, 10101, Zambia. ORCID
  2. Jane Chanda Kabwe: Young Emerging Scientists Zambia, Lusaka, Lusaka, 10101, Zambia.
  3. Andrew Kumwenda: Young Emerging Scientists Zambia, Lusaka, Lusaka, 10101, Zambia.
  4. Phyllis Chibuye Kasonkomona: Development Division, Technical Education, Vocational and Entrepreneurship Training Authority, Lusaka, Lusaka, 10101, Zambia.
  5. Grace Mwila: Graduate women Zambia, Lusaka, Lusaka, 10101, Zambia.
  6. Mwansa Ketty Lubeya: Young Emerging Scientists Zambia, Lusaka, Lusaka, 10101, Zambia.

Abstract

Background Since the globe was faced with the COVID-19 pandemic in December 2019, numerous adjustments have been made in all sectors to curtail the spread of infection. Most elementary and tertiary schools were closed or suspended until the transmission rates dropped. Following the outbreak of COVID-19, medical schools in Zambia have sought ways to replace face-to-face medical learning with virtual clinical teaching. The objectives of this study were to explore the perceptions of online learning among University of Zambia medical students and understand the barriers and facilitators to effective online learning. Methods A qualitative descriptive approach was used, enrolling final year medical students from the University of Zambia; the consenting participants were sampled purposively and interviewed through virtual platforms until data saturation was reached upon interviewing the 11 participant. A total of 14 participants were interviewed, audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and data was analyzed using six steps of thematic analysis. Results Three broad themes arose from the interviews: online learning perceptions, facilitators and barriers to online learning. Regarding perceptions of online learning, they highlighted that the delivery was simple to understand, with convenient scheduling and the benefit of being able to refer back to the recorded lectures. Some barriers encountered during the online learning were poor network connection, frequent power outages, lack of patient-student interaction and challenges with learning space in their homes. The facilitators were self-paced learning, availability of lecturers and the desire to complete their training despite the lockdown being in effect. Conclusions Most medical students had positive perceptions of online learning despite its challenges. With the improvement in technology, online education should be incorporated into the traditional training of medical students to get the best outcomes.

Keywords

Associated Data

figshare | 10.6084/m9.figshare.21086992.v1

References

  1. Med Teach. 2022 Mar;44(3):227-243 [PMID: 34689692]
  2. Indian J Surg. 2022 Apr;84(Suppl 1):104-108 [PMID: 34025052]
  3. Med Educ Online. 2019 Dec;24(1):1666538 [PMID: 31526248]
  4. Acad Med. 2017 Apr;92(4):430 [PMID: 28350599]
  5. Pak J Med Sci. 2020 May;36(COVID19-S4):S27-S31 [PMID: 32582310]
  6. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2021 Jan 31;59(233):98-99 [PMID: 34508454]
  7. Med Teach. 2012;34(2):161-4 [PMID: 22288996]
  8. BMC Med Educ. 2021 May 19;21(1):285 [PMID: 34006277]
  9. Germs. 2020 Sep 1;10(3):240-243 [PMID: 33134202]
  10. Anesthesiology. 2019 Jul;131(1):14-22 [PMID: 31045898]
  11. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2021 Aug 16;12:895-903 [PMID: 34429679]
  12. Anat Sci Educ. 2015 Jan-Feb;8(1):53-62 [PMID: 24920278]
  13. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Apr 16;110(16):6313-7 [PMID: 23576743]
  14. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2020 Aug 27;7:2382120520951819 [PMID: 32923673]
  15. Womens Health (Lond). 2022 Jan-Dec;18:17455057221111326 [PMID: 35838184]
  16. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2021 Mar 31;59(235):276-279 [PMID: 34506447]
  17. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2015 Jun 23;6:459-67 [PMID: 26150738]
  18. J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2017 Jul;5(3):116-123 [PMID: 28761885]
  19. BMC Med Educ. 2018 Jun 7;18(1):130 [PMID: 29880045]
  20. BMC Med Educ. 2020 Aug 28;20(1):285 [PMID: 32859188]
  21. J Family Med Prim Care. 2022 Sep;11(9):5375-5386 [PMID: 36505568]
  22. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Feb 19;100(7):e24821 [PMID: 33607848]
  23. Can J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2012 Spring;22(2):37-46 [PMID: 22803288]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0learningmedicalonlinestudentsCOVID-19ZambiaperceptionsvirtualUniversitybarriersfacilitatorsfinalyearpandemicschoolsstudyamongunderstandqualitativeparticipantsintervieweddatarecordedchallengestrainingdespiteeducationBackgroundSinceglobefacedDecember2019numerousadjustmentsmadesectorscurtailspreadinfectionelementarytertiaryclosedsuspendedtransmissionratesdroppedFollowingoutbreaksoughtwaysreplaceface-to-faceclinicalteachingobjectivesexploreeffectiveMethodsdescriptiveapproachusedenrollingconsentingsampledpurposivelyplatformssaturationreacheduponinterviewing11participanttotal14audiotranscribedverbatimanalyzedusingsixstepsthematicanalysisResultsThreebroadthemesaroseinterviews:Regardinghighlighteddeliverysimpleconvenientschedulingbenefitablereferbacklecturesencounteredpoornetworkconnectionfrequentpoweroutageslackpatient-studentinteractionspacehomesself-pacedavailabilitylecturersdesirecompletelockdowneffectConclusionspositiveimprovementtechnologyincorporatedtraditionalgetbestoutcomesOnlinelearning duringpandemic:studentquarantine

Similar Articles

Cited By