Spontaneous symmetry breaking of cooperation between species.

Christoph Hauert, Gy��rgy Szab��
Author Information
  1. Christoph Hauert: Department of Mathematics, University of British Columbia, 1984 Mathematics Road, Vancouver, BC, CanadaV6T 1Z2. ORCID
  2. Gy��rgy Szab��: Institute of Technical Physics and Materials Science, HUN-REN Centre for Energy Research, Konkoly-Thege M. ��t 29-33, Budapest H-1121, Hungary. ORCID

Abstract

In mutualistic associations, two species cooperate by exchanging goods or services with members of another species for their mutual benefit. At the same time, competition for reproduction primarily continues with members of their own species. In -species interactions, the prisoner's dilemma is the leading mathematical metaphor to study the evolution of cooperation. Here we consider -species interactions in the spatial prisoner's dilemma, where members of each species reside on one lattice layer. Cooperators provide benefits to neighbouring members of the other species at a cost to themselves. Hence, interactions occur across layers but competition remains within layers. We show that rich and complex dynamics unfold when varying the cost-to-benefit ratio of cooperation, . Four distinct dynamical domains emerge that are separated by critical phase transitions, each characterized by diverging fluctuations in the frequency of cooperation: for large cooperation is too costly and defection dominates; for lower cooperators survive at equal frequencies in both species; lowering further results in an intriguing, spontaneous symmetry breaking of cooperation between species with increasing asymmetry for decreasing ; finally, for small , bursts of mutual defection appear that increase in size with decreasing and eventually drive the populations into absorbing states. Typically, one species is cooperating and the other defecting and hence establish perfect asymmetry. Intriguingly and despite the symmetrical model set-up, natural selection can nevertheless favour the spontaneous emergence of asymmetric evolutionary outcomes where, on average, one species exploits the other in a dynamical equilibrium.

Keywords

References

  1. Biotechnol J. 2010 Jul;5(7):751-8 [PMID: 20540107]
  2. J Theor Biol. 2013 Sep 7;332:1-8 [PMID: 23614874]
  3. J Theor Biol. 2006 Mar 21;239(2):195-202 [PMID: 16242728]
  4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 May 15;115(20):5229-5234 [PMID: 29712857]
  5. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2002 Jan;65(1 Pt 2):016119 [PMID: 11800748]
  6. Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Topics. 1996 Apr;53(4):3078-3087 [PMID: 9964614]
  7. Entropy (Basel). 2022 Dec 15;24(12): [PMID: 36554239]
  8. Nature. 2005 Oct 27;437(7063):1291-8 [PMID: 16251955]
  9. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Oct 19;118(42): [PMID: 34649992]
  10. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2006 Mar;73(3 Pt 2):036127 [PMID: 16605618]
  11. Nature. 2006 May 25;441(7092):502-5 [PMID: 16724065]
  12. Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 Oct;21(10):585-92 [PMID: 16828927]
  13. Phys Rev Lett. 2015 Apr 24;114(16):168102 [PMID: 25955075]
  14. Cell. 2012 Mar 16;148(6):1258-70 [PMID: 22424233]
  15. Nature. 2017 Apr 13;544(7649):227-230 [PMID: 28355181]
  16. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Sep 11;98(19):10757-62 [PMID: 11553811]
  17. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2012 Nov;86(5 Pt 2):056113 [PMID: 23214849]
  18. Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Apr 22;269(1493):773-80 [PMID: 11958708]
  19. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Jul 21;95(15):8676-80 [PMID: 9671737]
  20. Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Mar;6(3):338-348 [PMID: 34980900]
  21. Chaos. 2020 Aug;30(8):083125 [PMID: 32872817]
  22. Sci Rep. 2014 Feb 14;4:4095 [PMID: 24526076]
  23. Science. 2002 May 10;296(5570):1129-32 [PMID: 12004134]
  24. Sci Rep. 2012;2:620 [PMID: 22943006]
  25. Nature. 2003 Sep 4;425(6953):78-81 [PMID: 12955144]
  26. Phys Life Rev. 2009 Dec;6(4):208-49 [PMID: 20416850]
  27. Elife. 2013 Nov 12;2:e00960 [PMID: 24220506]
  28. Phys Rev Lett. 2002 Sep 9;89(11):118101 [PMID: 12225171]
  29. Trends Ecol Evol. 2017 Oct;32(10):727-734 [PMID: 28739078]
  30. Evolution. 2013 Mar;67(3):698-707 [PMID: 23461321]
  31. Trends Biotechnol. 2007 Aug;25(8):338-42 [PMID: 17576018]
  32. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 May 8;378(1876):20210508 [PMID: 36934760]
  33. Nature. 1970 Dec 19;228(5277):1218-20 [PMID: 4395095]
  34. Microbiology (Reading). 2004 Aug;150(Pt 8):2751-2760 [PMID: 15289571]
  35. Bioessays. 2010 Jul;32(7):615-25 [PMID: 20517874]
  36. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2010 Aug;82(2 Pt 2):026110 [PMID: 20866879]
  37. Am Nat. 2003 Oct;162(4 Suppl):S24-39 [PMID: 14583855]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0speciescooperationmembersinteractionsdilemmaonemutualcompetition-speciesprisoner'slayersdynamicalphasetransitionsdefectionspontaneoussymmetrybreakingasymmetrydecreasingpopulationsmutualisticassociationstwocooperateexchanginggoodsservicesanotherbenefittimereproductionprimarilycontinuesleadingmathematicalmetaphorstudyevolutionconsiderspatialresidelatticelayerCooperatorsprovidebenefitsneighbouringcostHenceoccuracrossremainswithinshowrichcomplexdynamicsunfoldvaryingcost-to-benefitratioFourdistinctdomainsemergeseparatedcriticalcharacterizeddivergingfluctuationsfrequencycooperation:largecostlydominateslowercooperatorssurviveequalfrequenciesloweringresultsintriguingincreasingfinallysmallburstsappearincreasesizeeventuallydriveabsorbingstatesTypicallycooperatingdefectinghenceestablishperfectIntriguinglydespitesymmetricalmodelset-upnaturalselectioncanneverthelessfavouremergenceasymmetricevolutionaryoutcomesaverageexploitsequilibriumSpontaneouscrossprisoner���ssocialdilemmasstructured

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.