QSAR, molecular docking, and pharmacokinetic analysis of thiosemicarbazone-indole compounds targeting prostate cancer cells.

Abdulrahman Ibrahim Kubo, Adamu Uzairu, Ibrahim Tijjani Babalola, Muhammad Tukur Ibrahim, Abdullahi Bello Umar
Author Information
  1. Abdulrahman Ibrahim Kubo: Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Yobe State University, Damaturu, Nigeria.
  2. Adamu Uzairu: Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Physical Science, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria.
  3. Ibrahim Tijjani Babalola: Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Yobe State University, Damaturu, Nigeria.
  4. Muhammad Tukur Ibrahim: Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Physical Science, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria.
  5. Abdullahi Bello Umar: Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Physical Science, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria.

Abstract

Objectives: By 2030, prostate cancer is estimated to account for 1.7 million new cases and 499,000 deaths. The objectives of this research were to create a model revealing the activity of thiosemicarbazone-indole compounds as anticancer agents against the PC3 cell line; perform docking analysis between the compounds and the target enzyme; and predict the pharmacokinetics and drug-likeness of the compounds under investigation.
Methods: The quantitative structureactivity relationship (QSAR) method was used to build the model; molecular docking between the compounds and the target enzyme was performed; and the drug-likeness and pharmacokinetics of the inhibiting compounds was examined.
Results: The genetic function algorithm-multilinear regression approach was used for building the QSAR model. Build model 1 had the best performance, with R (coefficient of determination) = 0.972517, R (adjusted R-squared) = 0.964665, (CRp) = 0.780922, and LOF (leave-one-out cross-validation) = 0.076524, demonstrated strongly indicated by the molecular descriptors. SHBd, SsCH3, JGI2, and RDF60P were highly dependent on proliferative activity. Compounds ID 7 and 22 had the potential to act as androgen receptor inhibitors, as suggested by molecular docking studies between the drugs and their target enzymes. Compounds ID 7 and 22 exhibited binding scores of -8.5 kcal/mol and -8.8 kcal/mol, respectively. The approved maximum medication molecules for oral bioavailability included the molecules with IDs 7 and 22.
Conclusion: This research provides valuable insights into the relationships among molecular descriptors, potential inhibitors, and pharmacokinetic properties in the treatment of PC3. These findings may contribute to the understanding and potential development of new therapeutic options for prostate cancer patients.

Keywords

References

  1. Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2019;19(8):962-983 [PMID: 30864529]
  2. Biomedicines. 2021 Oct 01;9(10): [PMID: 34680491]
  3. World J Oncol. 2019 Apr;10(2):63-89 [PMID: 31068988]
  4. Stat Methods Med Res. 1995 Sep;4(3):197-217 [PMID: 8548103]
  5. J Urol. 2003 Nov;170(5):2019-25 [PMID: 14532845]
  6. Eur J Med Chem. 2021 Jan 15;210:112970 [PMID: 33153765]
  7. Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 03;7:42717 [PMID: 28256516]
  8. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2005 Oct 15;15(20):4451-5 [PMID: 16115762]
  9. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2017 Jun 1;27(11):2360-2363 [PMID: 28431878]
  10. Eur J Med Chem. 2015 Jan 7;89:421-41 [PMID: 25462257]
  11. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2008 Jul 15;18(14):4172-6 [PMID: 18541426]
  12. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1988 Oct;67(4):806-16 [PMID: 2458378]
  13. PLoS One. 2022 Jun 16;17(6):e0265068 [PMID: 35709194]
  14. Medchemcomm. 2018 May 24;9(7):1142-1146 [PMID: 30109001]
  15. Pharmacol Rev. 2013 Dec 31;66(1):334-95 [PMID: 24381236]
  16. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013 Jan;63(1):11-30 [PMID: 23335087]
  17. Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 23;9(1):10643 [PMID: 31337814]
  18. Adv Prev Med. 2019 May 2;2019:5173786 [PMID: 31186969]
  19. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2017 Jun 1;27(11):2454-2458 [PMID: 28408225]
  20. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2020 Nov 09;13(11): [PMID: 33182305]
  21. Bioorg Chem. 2019 Aug;89:103021 [PMID: 31176854]
  22. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2019 Mar 10;30(8):1062-1082 [PMID: 29334758]
  23. Eur J Med Chem. 2016 Jul 19;117:335-54 [PMID: 27161177]
  24. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Jan-Feb;65(1):5-29 [PMID: 25559415]
  25. Clin Cancer Res. 2003 Sep 15;9(11):4092-100 [PMID: 14519631]
  26. Pharmacogn Rev. 2017 Jul-Sep;11(22):57-72 [PMID: 28989242]
  27. Mol Inform. 2017 Jan;36(1-2): [PMID: 28001004]
  28. Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2023;23(13):1499-1505 [PMID: 37070442]
  29. Heliyon. 2020 Jan 07;6(1):e03158 [PMID: 32042954]
  30. Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med. 2013 Aug 12;10(5):210-29 [PMID: 24311829]
  31. Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Sep 18;20(18): [PMID: 31540350]
  32. Leuk Res. 2008 Jan;32(1):71-7 [PMID: 17640728]
  33. Clin Transl Med. 2018 Jan 17;7(1):3 [PMID: 29340951]
  34. Invest New Drugs. 2008 Apr;26(2):169-73 [PMID: 17851637]
  35. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2019;19(7):569-590 [PMID: 30324878]
  36. Chem Biol Interact. 2011 Jun 30;192(1-2):21-5 [PMID: 20863819]
  37. Future Med Chem. 2018 Aug 1;10(16):1881-1883 [PMID: 29925269]
  38. Food Chem. 2013 Aug 15;139(1-4):488-95 [PMID: 23561135]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0compoundsdockingmolecularcancer7modelQSAR = 0prostatePC3target22potential1newresearchactivitythiosemicarbazone-indolecelllineanalysisenzymepharmacokineticsdrug-likenessusedRdescriptorsCompoundsIDinhibitorsmoleculespharmacokineticObjectives:2030estimatedaccountmillioncases499000deathsobjectivescreaterevealinganticanceragentsperformpredictinvestigationMethods:quantitativestructureactivityrelationshipmethodbuildperformedinhibitingexaminedResults:geneticfunctionalgorithm-multilinearregressionapproachbuildingBuildbestperformancecoefficientdetermination972517adjustedR-squared964665CRp780922LOFleave-one-outcross-validation076524demonstratedstronglyindicatedSHBdSsCH3JGI2RDF60Phighlydependentproliferativeactandrogenreceptorsuggestedstudiesdrugsenzymesexhibitedbindingscoresof -85 kcal/moland -88 kcal/molrespectivelyapprovedmaximummedicationoralbioavailabilityincludedIDsConclusion:providesvaluableinsightsrelationshipsamongpropertiestreatmentfindingsmaycontributeunderstandingdevelopmenttherapeuticoptionspatientstargetingcellssilicoMolecularPharmacokineticsProstate

Similar Articles

Cited By