Craniofacial Imaging of Pediatric Patients by Ultrashort Echo-Time Bone-Selective MRI in Comparison to CT.

Nada Kamona, Jinggang J Ng, Yohan Kim, Brian-Tinh D Vu, Arastoo Vossough, Connor S Wagner, Holly Cordray, Hyunyeol Lee, Dillan F Villavisanis, Chamith S Rajapakse, Scott P Bartlett, Felix W Wehrli
Author Information
  1. Nada Kamona: Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
  2. Jinggang J Ng: Division of Plastic, Reconstructive and Oral Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
  3. Yohan Kim: Division of Plastic, Reconstructive and Oral Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
  4. Brian-Tinh D Vu: Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
  5. Arastoo Vossough: Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
  6. Connor S Wagner: Division of Plastic, Reconstructive and Oral Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
  7. Holly Cordray: Division of Plastic, Reconstructive and Oral Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
  8. Hyunyeol Lee: Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; School of Electronics Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea.
  9. Dillan F Villavisanis: Division of Plastic, Reconstructive and Oral Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
  10. Chamith S Rajapakse: Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
  11. Scott P Bartlett: Division of Plastic, Reconstructive and Oral Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
  12. Felix W Wehrli: Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. Electronic address: Felix.Wehrli@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.

Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The emergence of low-dose protocols for CT imaging has mitigated pediatric radiation exposure, yet ionizing radiation remains a concern for children with complex craniofacial conditions requiring repeated radiologic monitoring. In this work, the clinical feasibility of an ultrashort echo time (UTE) MRI sequence was investigated in pediatric patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve pediatric patients (6 female, age range 8 to 18 years) with various imaging conditions were scanned at 3T using a dual-radiofrequency, dual-echo UTE MRI sequence. Bright-bone images were generated using a weighted least-squares conjugate gradient method to enhance bone specificity. The overlap of the binary skull masks was quantified using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and the 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95) to evaluate the similarity between MRI and CT. To assess the anatomic accuracy of 3D skull reconstructions, six craniometric distances were recorded and the agreement between MRI- and CT-derived measurements was evaluated using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (��).
RESULTS: The bright-bone images from UTE MRI demonstrated high bone-contrast, suppression of soft tissue, and separation from air at the sinuses. The DSC and HD95 between MRI and CT had medians of 0.81 �� 0.10 and 1.87 �� 0.32 mm, respectively. There was good agreement between MRI and CT for all craniometric distances (�� ranging from 0.90 to 0.99) with a mean absolute difference in measurements of < 2 mm.
CONCLUSION: The clinical feasibility of the UTE MRI sequence for craniofacial imaging was demonstrated in a cohort of pediatric patients, showing good agreement with CT in resolving thin bone structures and craniometry.

Keywords

References

  1. Br J Radiol. 2021 Aug 1;94(1124):20200061 [PMID: 34233472]
  2. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Mar 1;153(3):667-677 [PMID: 37036329]
  3. Childs Nerv Syst. 2018 Jul;34(7):1383-1389 [PMID: 29594536]
  4. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021 Jun;163(6):1735-1741 [PMID: 32519160]
  5. Magn Reson Med. 2019 May;81(5):3007-3016 [PMID: 30565286]
  6. J Craniofac Surg. 2006 May;17(3):413-9 [PMID: 16770174]
  7. BMC Med Imaging. 2015 Aug 12;15:29 [PMID: 26263899]
  8. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2022 Apr 22;30(1):113-118 [PMID: 35453112]
  9. Pediatr Radiol. 2015 Sep;45(10):1544-53 [PMID: 25939873]
  10. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2016 Aug;2016:3342-3345 [PMID: 28269019]
  11. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Apr;123(4):1313-1320 [PMID: 19337099]
  12. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020 Apr;73(4):723-731 [PMID: 31917189]
  13. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2024 Sep 9;45(9):1284-1290 [PMID: 38991771]
  14. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019 Jan;40(1):109-115 [PMID: 30545839]
  15. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 May 1;153(5):962e-970e [PMID: 37184453]
  16. J Craniofac Surg. 2015 Sep;26(6):1900-3 [PMID: 26267578]
  17. MAGMA. 2024 Feb;37(1):83-92 [PMID: 37934295]
  18. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2020 Jun 12;26(3):311-317 [PMID: 32534502]
  19. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Mar 19;: [PMID: 38507553]
  20. Eur Radiol. 2016 Mar;26(3):892-9 [PMID: 26123408]
  21. Acad Radiol. 2020 Nov;27(11):1515-1522 [PMID: 32299762]
  22. Acad Radiol. 2022 Mar;29 Suppl 3:S98-S106 [PMID: 33903011]
  23. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2011 Jan;39(1):24-9 [PMID: 20418107]
  24. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Mar;52(3):258-63 [PMID: 24456609]
  25. Magn Reson Med. 2016 Jan;75(1):107-14 [PMID: 25639956]
  26. JAMA Pediatr. 2013 Aug 1;167(8):700-7 [PMID: 23754213]
  27. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Jul;140(1):82e-93e [PMID: 28654610]
  28. Arch Intern Med. 2009 Dec 14;169(22):2078-86 [PMID: 20008690]
  29. Dose Response. 2020 May 05;18(2):1559325820923828 [PMID: 32425727]
  30. Magn Reson Med. 2017 Feb;77(2):684-695 [PMID: 26972442]
  31. Br J Radiol. 2012 Mar;85(1011):272-8 [PMID: 22391497]
  32. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2003 Nov-Dec;27(6):825-46 [PMID: 14600447]
  33. Lancet. 2012 Aug 4;380(9840):499-505 [PMID: 22681860]
  34. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Jan 23;12(1):e5558 [PMID: 38264445]
  35. Neuroradiology. 2019 Jan;61(1):81-87 [PMID: 30406272]
  36. Eur Radiol. 2014 Oct;24(10):2417-26 [PMID: 25038852]
  37. J Craniofac Surg. 2013 Jul;24(4):1106-10 [PMID: 23851749]
  38. Br J Radiol. 2022 Aug 1;95(1136):20220059 [PMID: 35616709]
  39. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019 Sep;40(9):1562-1566 [PMID: 31467238]
  40. BMJ. 2013 May 21;346:f2360 [PMID: 23694687]
  41. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2016 May;59(3):219-26 [PMID: 27226852]
  42. Br J Radiol. 2012 Nov;85(1019):1457-64 [PMID: 23091288]
  43. Children (Basel). 2020 Dec 17;7(12): [PMID: 33348822]

Grants

  1. R21 DE028417/NIDCR NIH HHS
  2. T32 AR007132/NIAMS NIH HHS
  3. T32 EB020087/NIBIB NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Humans
Child
Adolescent
Female
Male
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Skull
Feasibility Studies
Imaging, Three-Dimensional

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0MRICTUTEpediatricusingimagingsequencepatientsagreement0ANDradiationcraniofacialconditionsclinicalfeasibilityimagesboneskullsimilaritycoefficientDSCHD95craniometricdistancesmeasurements��demonstratedgoodCraniofacialPediatricRATIONALEOBJECTIVES:emergencelow-doseprotocolsmitigatedexposureyetionizingremainsconcernchildrencomplexrequiringrepeatedradiologicmonitoringworkultrashortechotimeinvestigatedMATERIALSMETHODS:Twelve6femaleagerange818yearsvariousscanned3Tdual-radiofrequencydual-echoBright-bonegeneratedweightedleast-squaresconjugategradientmethodenhancespecificityoverlapbinarymasksquantifiedDice95thpercentileHausdorffdistanceevaluateassessanatomicaccuracy3DreconstructionssixrecordedMRI-CT-derivedevaluatedLin'sconcordancecorrelationRESULTS:bright-bonehighbone-contrastsuppressionsofttissueseparationairsinusesmedians81 �� 010187 �� 032 mmrespectivelyranging9099meanabsolutedifference< 2 mmCONCLUSION:cohortshowingresolvingthinstructurescraniometryImagingPatientsUltrashortEcho-TimeBone-SelectiveComparisonRadiation

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.