Green dreams are made of this: Futures consciousness and proenvironmental engagement.

Fanny Lalot, Sanna Ahvenharju, Outi Uusitalo
Author Information
  1. Fanny Lalot: Faculty of Psychology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. ORCID
  2. Sanna Ahvenharju: Finland Futures Research Centre, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
  3. Outi Uusitalo: School of Business and Economics, University of Jyv��skyl��, Jyv��skyl��, Finland.

Abstract

Futures consciousness (FC) refers to the capacity to understand, anticipate and prepare for the future. As a form of future orientation, it encompasses five interrelated dimensions of time perspective, agency beliefs, openness to alternatives, systems perception and concern for others. We present here cross-sectional evidence that FC is related to greater environmental engagement, above and beyond other future orientation constructs. In two pre-registered studies (one convenience student sample and one representative sample; N���=���1041), we found that respondents with higher futures consciousness reported greater proenvironmental behaviour (consumption behaviour, land stewardship, social environmentalism and environmental citizenship). FC proved a better predictor of proenvironmental behaviour than the Zimbardo Inventory's Future Time Perspective and the Consideration for Future Consequences Scale (Study 1). FC was also related to stronger biospheric values (Study 2). However, it was not significantly related to personal environmental footprint (derived from a 16-item calculator). Strikingly, the environmental footprint was also unrelated to the Proenvironmental Behaviour Scale, which could point to a lack of correspondence between measures of proenvironmental propensity and impact. We discuss implications for future-thinking research and interventions aiming to improve futures consciousness.

Keywords

References

  1. J Exp Anal Behav. 2015 Jan;103(1):1-9 [PMID: 25641079]
  2. Int J Psychol. 2012;47(5):325-34 [PMID: 22452746]
  3. Behav Brain Sci. 2022 Sep 05;46:e147 [PMID: 36059098]
  4. Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Aug;178:110862 [PMID: 36540789]
  5. Annu Rev Psychol. 2019 Jan 4;70:191-217 [PMID: 30110574]
  6. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 16;17(22): [PMID: 33207676]
  7. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 Oct;38(10):1272-87 [PMID: 22833533]
  8. Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 05;13:901927 [PMID: 36148133]
  9. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Dec 30;111(52):18414-21 [PMID: 25416592]
  10. Br J Soc Psychol. 2025 Jan;64(1):e12799 [PMID: 39254053]
  11. J Soc Psychol. 2017;157(5):517-531 [PMID: 27454464]
  12. Behav Res Methods. 2023 Feb;55(2):600-622 [PMID: 35355239]
  13. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(1):192-204 [PMID: 25191929]

Grants

  1. /Jyv��skyl�� University School of Business and Economics
  2. 345885/Strategic Research Council (Academy of Finland)
  3. /Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur F��rderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung

MeSH Term

Humans
Male
Adult
Female
Consciousness
Young Adult
Middle Aged
Cross-Sectional Studies
Adolescent
Environment
Forecasting
Aged
Conservation of Natural Resources

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0consciousnessfutureproenvironmentalFCenvironmentalbehaviourorientationrelatedfuturesfootprintFuturesgreaterengagementonesampleFutureScaleStudyalsobiosphericvaluesreferscapacityunderstandanticipateprepareformencompassesfiveinterrelateddimensionstimeperspectiveagencybeliefsopennessalternativessystemsperceptionconcernotherspresentcross-sectionalevidencebeyondconstructstwopre-registeredstudiesconveniencestudentrepresentativeN���=���1041foundrespondentshigherreportedconsumptionlandstewardshipsocialenvironmentalismcitizenshipprovedbetterpredictorZimbardoInventory'sTimePerspectiveConsiderationConsequences1stronger2Howeversignificantlypersonalderived16-itemcalculatorStrikinglyunrelatedProenvironmentalBehaviourpointlackcorrespondencemeasurespropensityimpactdiscussimplicationsfuture-thinkingresearchinterventionsaimingimproveGreendreamsmadethis:carbonthinking

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)