Effect of non-invasive brain stimulation in children with acquired brain injury-a scoping review.

Chandrasekar Rathinam, Vikram Mohan, Derick Yates, Peter Bill, Janet Peirson, Rajat Gupta
Author Information
  1. Chandrasekar Rathinam: Birmingham Medical School, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
  2. Vikram Mohan: Department of Rehabilitation and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, United Kingdom.
  3. Derick Yates: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
  4. Peter Bill: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
  5. Janet Peirson: Retired Physiotherapist, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  6. Rajat Gupta: Birmingham Medical School, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Abstract

Background: Children and young people (CYP) with acquired brain injury (ABI) require early and effective neurorehabilitation to improve long-term functional outcomes. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), including transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), have been used to improve motor and sensory skills for children with cerebral palsy. However, there is limited evidence supporting its use in CYP with ABI.
Objective: To systematically review the TMS and tDCS intervention effects on motor, sensory and other functional issues in CYP with ABI as reported in the literature.
Methods: A comprehensive online bibliographic databases search was performed in various databases using keywords related to NIBS and CYP with ABI. Studies that examine the effect of NIBS intervention on motor function and other functional difficulties either as a primary or secondary objective were included in this review.
Results: Fourteen studies (10 single case reports, one retrospective analysis, one case series, one randomised and one quasi-randomised controlled trial) published between 2006 and 2023 were identified. These studies examined the use of NIBS to manage motor disorders, hearing, vision, headaches, speech and language and memory issues. Seventy-six children with mild to severe ABI had received NIBS. The session frequency (3-20), duration (10-45 min) was variable, and NIBS delivered between 3 and 28 days.
Conclusion: The literature describing NIBS interventions in CYP with ABI is scarce. An insufficient number of studies, inadequate information reported in them, and small sample sizes limit the ability to conclude how effective NIBS is in improving motor function and other functional issues in this cohort. Further studies are therefore necessary to examine the therapeutic effects of NIBS to manage various functional problems in the CYP with ABI.

Keywords

References

  1. Dev Neurorehabil. 2021 Jan;24(1):68-72 [PMID: 33161826]
  2. J Hand Ther. 2019 Oct - Dec;32(4):426-434.e1 [PMID: 30017414]
  3. Brain Inj. 2016;30(13-14):1656-1664 [PMID: 27740853]
  4. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2022 Jan;64(1):40-48 [PMID: 34309829]
  5. Cell Tissue Res. 2022 Mar;387(3):399-414 [PMID: 34820704]
  6. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2018 Oct 23;18(12):97 [PMID: 30353408]
  7. Lancet Neurol. 2008 Jun;7(6):507-13 [PMID: 18455961]
  8. PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24981 [PMID: 21957470]
  9. Front Neural Circuits. 2016 Jul 27;10:56 [PMID: 27512367]
  10. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2018 Feb 6;14(1):6-15 [PMID: 31903073]
  11. Innov Clin Neurosci. 2022 Apr-Jun;19(4-6):11-22 [PMID: 35958966]
  12. Brain Inj. 2022 Jan 02;36(1):39-51 [PMID: 35157529]
  13. Brain Lang. 2016 Aug;159:23-34 [PMID: 27262774]
  14. Front Neurosci. 2017 Nov 22;11:641 [PMID: 29213226]
  15. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Oct;100(10):1945-1963 [PMID: 31078616]
  16. Brain. 2011 Aug;134(Pt 8):2197-221 [PMID: 21784775]
  17. Prog Brain Res. 2021;264:287-322 [PMID: 34167660]
  18. J Int Med Res. 2016 Jun;44(3):760-4 [PMID: 26920927]
  19. Physiother Res Int. 2024 Jan;29(1):e2054 [PMID: 37838979]
  20. Neuroscientist. 2024 Apr;30(2):260-274 [PMID: 36059273]
  21. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2020 Apr;42:100764 [PMID: 32072937]
  22. Acta Neurol Belg. 2006 Mar;106(1):26-30 [PMID: 16776434]
  23. Iran J Psychiatry. 2022 Jul;17(3):350-355 [PMID: 36474694]
  24. Dev Neurorehabil. 2020 Feb;23(2):133-136 [PMID: 31424312]
  25. Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Mar;41(6):727-739 [PMID: 29157025]
  26. Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Feb 04;15:631838 [PMID: 33613218]
  27. Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2009;15(2):94-101 [PMID: 19489084]
  28. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019 Nov;61(11):1240 [PMID: 31576561]
  29. Neuron. 2014 Jul 16;83(2):283-308 [PMID: 25033178]
  30. Clin Neurophysiol. 2022 Aug;140:59-97 [PMID: 35738037]
  31. J Neurol Sci. 2021 Jan 15;420:117271 [PMID: 33359928]
  32. BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 1;9(8):e029273 [PMID: 31375619]
  33. Case Rep Med. 2018 Mar 25;2018:8934253 [PMID: 29770150]
  34. Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473 [PMID: 30178033]
  35. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2021 Mar-Apr 01;36(2):E108-E117 [PMID: 32769830]
  36. NeuroRehabilitation. 2015;36(1):31-6 [PMID: 25547762]
  37. Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 5;5(1):210 [PMID: 27919275]
  38. Dev Neurorehabil. 2021 Aug;24(6):379-387 [PMID: 33615981]
  39. Can J Neurol Sci. 2022 Jul;49(4):479-492 [PMID: 34238393]
  40. Front Neurol. 2013 Mar 21;4:25 [PMID: 23519166]
  41. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2023;43(4):463-481 [PMID: 36624962]
  42. Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Apr 2;20(1):36 [PMID: 35366898]
  43. Brain Stimul. 2020 May - Jun;13(3):565-575 [PMID: 32289678]
  44. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2023 May;7(1): [PMID: 37130655]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0NIBSABICYPstimulationmotorbrainfunctionaltranscranialchildrenstudiesoneacquiredTMStDCSreviewissuesfunctionyoungpeopleinjuryeffectiveimprovemagneticdirectcurrentsensoryuseinterventioneffectsreportedliteraturedatabasesvariousexaminecasemanageBackground:Childrenrequireearlyneurorehabilitationlong-termoutcomesNon-invasiveincludingusedskillscerebralpalsyHoweverlimitedevidencesupportingObjective:systematicallyMethods:comprehensiveonlinebibliographicsearchperformedusingkeywordsrelatedStudieseffectdifficultieseitherprimarysecondaryobjectiveincludedResults:Fourteen10singlereportsretrospectiveanalysisseriesrandomisedquasi-randomisedcontrolledtrialpublished20062023identifiedexamineddisordershearingvisionheadachesspeechlanguagememorySeventy-sixmildseverereceivedsessionfrequency3-20duration10-45 minvariabledelivered328 daysConclusion:describinginterventionsscarceinsufficientnumberinadequateinformationsmallsamplesizeslimitabilityconcludeimprovingcohortthereforenecessarytherapeuticproblemsEffectnon-invasiveinjury-ascoping

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)