Chinese College Students' Stigmatization towards People with Mental Illness: Familiarity, Perceived Dangerousness, Fear, and Social Distance.

Xu-Hong Li, Yin-Ling Irene Wong, Qinglu Wu, Mao-Sheng Ran, Tian-Ming Zhang
Author Information
  1. Xu-Hong Li: Department of Social and Behavioural Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
  2. Yin-Ling Irene Wong: School of Social Policy & Practice, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 16802, USA.
  3. Qinglu Wu: Institute of Advanced Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Zhuhai 519087, China.
  4. Mao-Sheng Ran: Mental Health Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China. ORCID
  5. Tian-Ming Zhang: Department of Social Work, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Attribution models have been examined in Western countries. However, little is known about the applicability of the attitude-emotion-behavior model within Chinese culture. This study aimed to examine the association between familiarity, perceived dangerousness, fear, and social distance towards persons with mental illness (PMI) in the Chinese context.
METHODS: An online cross-sectional survey was conducted from October to November 2022 in mainland China. A total of 1493 college students completed a questionnaire evaluating familiarity, perception of dangerousness, fear, and social distance regarding PMI. Path analysis was employed to validate the model proposed in this study.
RESULTS: Participants expressed moderate to high levels of stigma towards PMI. Familiarity was negatively associated with social distance ( < 0.01). Participants who perceived PMI as dangerous were more prone to exhibit a reaction of fear ( < 0.001), consequently leading to social distance ( < 0.01). However, the mediating effect of perceived dangerousness and fear on the relationship between familiarity and social distance was not significant ( > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study provide support for Corrigan's attributional model of stigma in the Chinese context. Contact-based interventions for stigma reduction should emphasize multiple elements of contact, including the quality of contact, rather than familiarity.

Keywords

References

  1. Schizophr Bull. 2002;28(2):293-309 [PMID: 12693435]
  2. Gen Psychiatr. 2021 Feb 9;34(1):e100424 [PMID: 33644689]
  3. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2022 Mar 03;22:100419 [PMID: 35257121]
  4. Front Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 13;12:798909 [PMID: 34966314]
  5. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2021 Sep;67(6):622-631 [PMID: 33059491]
  6. Hong Kong Med J. 2015 Apr;21 Suppl 2:9-12 [PMID: 25852095]
  7. J Health Soc Behav. 2003 Jun;44(2):162-79 [PMID: 12866388]
  8. J Am Coll Health. 2022 Apr;70(3):929-939 [PMID: 32877632]
  9. J Health Soc Behav. 1986 Dec;27(4):289-302 [PMID: 3559124]
  10. Cult Med Psychiatry. 2017 Dec;41(4):480-498 [PMID: 28378037]
  11. PLoS One. 2013 Dec 04;8(12):e82116 [PMID: 24324756]
  12. Can J Psychiatry. 2012 Aug;57(8):464-9 [PMID: 22854028]
  13. J Am Coll Health. 2021 Oct;69(7):734-741 [PMID: 31944929]
  14. Psychol Med. 2015 Jan;45(1):11-27 [PMID: 24569086]
  15. Singapore Med J. 2007 Nov;48(11):977-85 [PMID: 17975685]
  16. BMC Psychiatry. 2021 May 29;21(1):274 [PMID: 34051783]
  17. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2022 Dec 17;16(1):57 [PMID: 36527036]
  18. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2022 May 06;20:eCE6760 [PMID: 35584448]
  19. J Ment Health. 2019 Jun;28(3):255-259 [PMID: 27885883]
  20. Clin Psychol Rev. 2019 Jun;70:40-50 [PMID: 30908990]
  21. BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Jan 7;21(1):8 [PMID: 33413195]
  22. J Am Coll Health. 2018 May-Jun;66(4):284-291 [PMID: 29419361]
  23. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2021 Nov;67(7):935-945 [PMID: 33231134]
  24. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019 Apr 01;29:e28 [PMID: 30929650]
  25. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2017 Aug;26(4):371-382 [PMID: 27018715]
  26. Schizophr Res. 2016 Apr;172(1-3):184-8 [PMID: 26843510]
  27. BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 22;20(1):323 [PMID: 32571270]
  28. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2014 Sep-Oct;37(5):524-33 [PMID: 24629567]
  29. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2013 Jun;201(6):490-503 [PMID: 23719324]
  30. Psychiatry Res. 2014 Feb 28;215(2):466-70 [PMID: 24388505]
  31. Cult Med Psychiatry. 2018 Sep;42(3):535-551 [PMID: 29508204]
  32. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2022 Jun;68(4):827-835 [PMID: 33827300]
  33. World Psychiatry. 2005 Jun;4(2):106-13 [PMID: 16633526]
  34. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2021 Jun;15(3):686-696 [PMID: 32583621]
  35. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2022 Mar;68(2):365-375 [PMID: 33622065]
  36. Ment Illn. 2012 Apr 30;4(1):e8 [PMID: 25478110]
  37. Soc Sci Med. 2008 Aug;67(3):398-408 [PMID: 18420325]
  38. Soc Sci Med. 2010 Dec;71(12):2150-61 [PMID: 21051128]
  39. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2014 May;49(5):781-9 [PMID: 24068437]
  40. Psych J. 2023 Feb;12(1):119-127 [PMID: 36174984]
  41. Community Ment Health J. 2004 Jun;40(3):265-74 [PMID: 15259631]
  42. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2016 May;62(3):205-13 [PMID: 26721540]
  43. Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 28;10(1):15897 [PMID: 32985593]
  44. Psychiatr Serv. 2001 Jul;52(7):953-8 [PMID: 11433114]
  45. Int Psychogeriatr. 2019 Oct;31(10):1393-1401 [PMID: 31309916]
  46. Psychiatr Serv. 2005 May;56(5):544-50 [PMID: 15872162]
  47. BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Apr 9;22(1):71 [PMID: 33836653]
  48. Psychiatr Serv. 2012 Jan;63(1):79-82 [PMID: 22227764]
  49. Am J Public Health. 2013 May;103(5):777-80 [PMID: 23488489]
  50. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2009 Apr;63(2):153-60 [PMID: 19335384]
  51. Schizophr Bull. 1999;25(3):447-56 [PMID: 10478780]
  52. Am J Psychiatry. 2001 Mar;158(3):479-81 [PMID: 11229992]
  53. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2007 Sep;42(9):723-33 [PMID: 17522747]
  54. Schizophr Res. 2004 Aug 1;69(2-3):175-82 [PMID: 15469191]
  55. Clin Psychol Rev. 2011 Aug;31(6):934-48 [PMID: 21683671]
  56. Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 20;12(1):10347 [PMID: 35725744]
  57. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2012 Nov;46(11):1029-45 [PMID: 22422995]
  58. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 06;19(14): [PMID: 35886103]
  59. BMC Geriatr. 2020 Mar 14;20(1):104 [PMID: 32171246]
  60. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2020 Feb 1;58(2):27-31 [PMID: 31710369]

Grants

  1. 20CSH028/National Social Science Fund of China

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0socialdistancefamiliarityfearChineseperceiveddangerousnessPMI0modelstudytowardsstigma<HowevercontextcollegestudentsParticipantsFamiliarity01contactBACKGROUND:AttributionmodelsexaminedWesterncountrieslittleknownapplicabilityattitude-emotion-behaviorwithincultureaimedexamineassociationpersonsmentalillnessMETHODS:onlinecross-sectionalsurveyconductedOctoberNovember2022mainlandChinatotal1493completedquestionnaireevaluatingperceptionregardingPathanalysisemployedvalidateproposedRESULTS:expressedmoderatehighlevelsnegativelyassociateddangerousproneexhibitreaction001consequentlyleadingmediatingeffectrelationshipsignificant>05CONCLUSIONS:resultsprovidesupportCorrigan'sattributionalContact-basedinterventionsreductionemphasizemultipleelementsincludingqualityratherCollegeStudents'StigmatizationPeopleMentalIllness:PerceivedDangerousnessFearSocialDistance

Similar Articles

Cited By