School Bullying, Bystander Behavior, and Mental Health among Adolescents: The Mediating Roles of Self-Efficacy and Coping Styles.

Xu Wang, Leiyu Shi, Yunzhi Ding, Bowen Liu, Hongbao Chen, Wei Zhou, Renjie Yu, Peiyun Zhang, Xin Huang, Yong Yang, Zhijun Wu
Author Information
  1. Xu Wang: Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. ORCID
  2. Leiyu Shi: Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
  3. Yunzhi Ding: Vanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
  4. Bowen Liu: Vanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
  5. Hongbao Chen: Suzhou Guangji Hospital, Suzhou 215137, China.
  6. Wei Zhou: Suzhou Guangji Hospital, Suzhou 215137, China.
  7. Renjie Yu: Suzhou Guangji Hospital, Suzhou 215137, China.
  8. Peiyun Zhang: Suzhou Guangji Hospital, Suzhou 215137, China.
  9. Xin Huang: Vanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
  10. Yong Yang: Suzhou Guangji Hospital, Suzhou 215137, China. ORCID
  11. Zhijun Wu: Vanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.

Abstract

While numerous studies have revealed the impact of different bullying behaviors, such as victimization and perpetration, on the psychological development of adolescents, the exploration of the correlates of positive/negative bystander behaviors and their potential underlying mechanisms remains scarce in China. The present study aims to compare the relationships between mental health and positive versus negative bystander behavior and to clarify whether self-efficacy and coping styles mediate the relationships between mental health and bullying dynamics. The current study was conducted on 11,734 students from 18 secondary schools in Suzhou, China ( = 15.00, = 1.47; 53.8% boys). The information on bullying victimization, perpetration, positive/negative bystander behaviors, as well as self-efficacy, coping styles and mental health variables (including depression, anxiety, sleep disturbance, suicide risk), were collected. Negative bystander behavior was positively associated with mental health problems, while positive bystander behavior was negatively associated with these factors. Also, further analysis showed that coping styles and self-efficacy mediated the relationship between different bullying behaviors and mental health outcomes. The results highlighted the comparison of the correlates of positive and negative bystander behaviors, which were comparably crucial to those of victims and perpetrators for prevention and intervention efforts. Promoting adaptive coping styles and self-efficacy to buffer the deleterious psychological consequences of bullying behavior in adolescents was also important.

Keywords

References

  1. BMC Psychiatry. 2017 May 3;17(1):160 [PMID: 28468644]
  2. World Psychiatry. 2023 Feb;22(1):86-104 [PMID: 36640414]
  3. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2023 Feb;54(1):154-175 [PMID: 34435243]
  4. Psychol Rev. 1977 Mar;84(2):191-215 [PMID: 847061]
  5. Pediatrics. 2015 Feb;135(2):e496-509 [PMID: 25560447]
  6. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2218746 [PMID: 35759263]
  7. Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jan 14;10:960 [PMID: 31993000]
  8. BMC Public Health. 2016 Oct 10;16(1):1066 [PMID: 27724881]
  9. J Adolesc. 2017 Oct;60:155-160 [PMID: 28774581]
  10. BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 30;23(1):215 [PMID: 36997959]
  11. Crisis. 2010;31(3):143-8 [PMID: 20573608]
  12. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7 [PMID: 16717171]
  13. Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 22;13(1):20524 [PMID: 37993570]
  14. West J Emerg Med. 2012 Aug;13(3):247-52 [PMID: 22900122]
  15. Psychol Med. 2023 Jul;53(9):4152-4159 [PMID: 35388770]
  16. J Youth Adolesc. 2010 Jan;39(1):1-11 [PMID: 20091212]
  17. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59 Suppl 20:22-33;quiz 34-57 [PMID: 9881538]
  18. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2022 Dec;57(12):2401-2409 [PMID: 35895096]
  19. Violence Vict. 2004 Apr;19(2):239-55 [PMID: 15384457]
  20. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2023 Dec;24(5):3445-3460 [PMID: 36331136]
  21. J Affect Disord. 2020 Aug 1;273:274-279 [PMID: 32421613]
  22. School Ment Health. 2019 Sep;11(3):454-463 [PMID: 38765181]
  23. J Appl Psychol. 2001 Jun;86(3):401-9 [PMID: 11419800]
  24. Child Abuse Negl. 2017 Mar;65:112-123 [PMID: 28131946]
  25. BMC Public Health. 2021 Dec 11;21(1):2249 [PMID: 34895204]
  26. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Dec;51(6):1173-82 [PMID: 3806354]
  27. Psychol Health Med. 2015;20(6):635-45 [PMID: 25588098]
  28. PLoS One. 2014 Jul 30;9(7):e102145 [PMID: 25076490]
  29. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;61(2):255-276 [PMID: 34015483]
  30. J Appl Dev Psychol. 2022 May-Jun;80: [PMID: 35444357]
  31. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2014 Sep-Oct;36(5):539-44 [PMID: 25023953]
  32. Eur Psychiatry. 2001 Aug;16(5):283-8 [PMID: 11514130]
  33. J Adolesc Health. 2013 Jul;53(1 Suppl):S32-6 [PMID: 23790198]
  34. J Health Monit. 2021 Dec 08;6(4):3-19 [PMID: 35146318]
  35. Int J Nurs Pract. 2021 Jun;27(3):e12930 [PMID: 33830586]
  36. J Child Fam Stud. 2018;27: [PMID: 30174382]
  37. J Affect Disord. 2019 Feb 15;245:744-749 [PMID: 30448758]
  38. Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 05;12:690898 [PMID: 34421742]
  39. Cureus. 2023 Jun 7;15(6):e40077 [PMID: 37425537]
  40. Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 26;13:925727 [PMID: 36225678]
  41. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2022 Jul 5;77(7):1361-1371 [PMID: 35085393]
  42. BMC Psychol. 2020 Apr 22;8(1):38 [PMID: 32321593]
  43. J Occup Health Psychol. 2022 Feb;27(1):119-135 [PMID: 34370497]
  44. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13 [PMID: 11556941]
  45. Qual Life Res. 2005 Oct;14(8):1943-52 [PMID: 16155782]
  46. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2019 Jan;20(1):3-21 [PMID: 30803395]
  47. J Affect Disord. 2014 Feb;155:174-9 [PMID: 24269003]
  48. Psychiatry Res. 2022 Aug;314:114649 [PMID: 35643051]
  49. J Child Adolesc Couns. 2019;5(3):221-238 [PMID: 33015352]
  50. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014 Nov;23(11):1023-41 [PMID: 25212880]
  51. J Affect Disord. 2009 Sep;117(1-2):48-54 [PMID: 19168224]
  52. J Community Psychol. 2023 Jan;51(1):120-136 [PMID: 35615901]

Grants

  1. LCZX202326/Suzhou Key Diagnosis and Treatment Program

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0bystanderbullyingmentalhealthbehaviorspositivebehaviorself-efficacycopingstylesnegativedifferentvictimizationperpetrationpsychologicaladolescentscorrelatespositive/negativeChinastudyrelationships=associatednumerousstudiesrevealedimpactdevelopmentexplorationpotentialunderlyingmechanismsremainsscarcepresentaimscompareversusclarifywhethermediatedynamicscurrentconducted11734students18secondaryschoolsSuzhou1500147538%boysinformationwellvariablesincludingdepressionanxietysleepdisturbancesuicideriskcollectedNegativepositivelyproblemsnegativelyfactorsAlsoanalysisshowedmediatedrelationshipoutcomesresultshighlightedcomparisoncomparablycrucialvictimsperpetratorspreventioninterventioneffortsPromotingadaptivebufferdeleteriousconsequencesalsoimportantSchoolBullyingBystanderBehaviorMentalHealthamongAdolescents:MediatingRolesSelf-EfficacyCopingStylesmediatingrole

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.