Single anterior shoulder dislocation patients demonstrate higher rates of posterior labral repair and biceps procedures than multiple dislocators at the time of arthroscopic stabilization surgery.

Brandon Wilde, Christopher Clinker, Adrik Da Silva, Natalya McNamara, Samuel Simister, Peter N Chalmers, Justin Ernat
Author Information
  1. Brandon Wilde: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  2. Christopher Clinker: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  3. Adrik Da Silva: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  4. Natalya McNamara: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  5. Samuel Simister: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  6. Peter N Chalmers: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  7. Justin Ernat: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Abstract

Hypothesis: The purpose of this study is to identify and compare demographic, clinical, historical, and intraoperative variables in patients who have received arthroscopic treatment for single vs. multiple anterior shoulder dislocations.
Methods: This is a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent arthroscopic labral repair of the shoulder by six surgeons at a single institution between 2012 and 2020. patients with a documented anterior shoulder dislocation were included. patients with pain-only, subluxation-only, multidirectional or posterior instability, and prior shoulder surgeries of any kind were excluded. Studied variables included age, sex, laterality, body mass index, contact/collision sports, Charlson comorbidity index, tobacco use, number of dislocations (1, >1), labral tear size, time from first dislocation to surgery, anchor number, and concomitant procedures. Study groups were compared using student's t-tests and Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and chi-square or Fisher's exact tests for discrete variables with a significance of 0.05.
Results: Six hundred thirty-three patients were identified, and 351 (85 single dislocators [SDs], 266 multiple dislocators [MDs]) met inclusion criteria (mean age: 27 years; range: 14-71 years). There were no demographic differences between the study groups. SD received surgery significantly sooner at 17 ± 44 months after injury, while MD received surgery 53 ± 74 months postinitial dislocation. SDs (30/85, 35%) were significantly more likely than MDs (56/266, 21%) to receive concomitant posterior labrum repair. MDs (46/266, 17%) were significantly more likely than SDs (5/85, 6%) to receive a remplissage. SDs (11/85, 13%) were significantly more likely than MDs (11/266, 4%) to receive a concomitant biceps tenotomy/tenodesis. There were no other significant differences in injury or surgery characteristics.
Conclusion: MDs will have more time between their initial dislocation and arthroscopic labral repair and are more likely to receive a remplissage procedure, yet they are less likely than SDs to receive a concomitant posterior labral repair or biceps tenodesis/tenotomy despite no differences in age, sex, and activity level. Whether the greater extent of labrum injury in SD is due to a more severe initial injury vs. earlier recognition and intervention requires further study.

Keywords

References

  1. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021 Jan 15;29(2):e51-e61 [PMID: 33275397]
  2. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Nov;91(11):2537-42 [PMID: 19884424]
  3. Arthroscopy. 2005 Jan;21(1):55-63 [PMID: 15650667]
  4. Am J Sports Med. 2018 Apr;46(5):1064-1069 [PMID: 29505730]
  5. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Feb;42(2):442-50 [PMID: 24275862]
  6. BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 14;7(11):e016112 [PMID: 29138197]
  7. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2011 Dec;4(4):200-7 [PMID: 21808996]
  8. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004 May;86(4):469-79 [PMID: 15174539]
  9. Am J Sports Med. 1994 Sep-Oct;22(5):589-94 [PMID: 7810780]
  10. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 May-Jun;18(3):339-47 [PMID: 19254851]
  11. Am J Sports Med. 2016 Nov;44(11):2792-2799 [PMID: 27496904]
  12. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Mar;92(3):542-9 [PMID: 20194311]
  13. Arthroscopy. 2016 Dec;32(12):2616-2625 [PMID: 27487737]
  14. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jul;45(8):1776-1782 [PMID: 28384005]
  15. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001 Nov-Dec;10(6):508-13 [PMID: 11743527]
  16. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Nov;88(11):2326-36 [PMID: 17079387]
  17. Arthroscopy. 2020 Nov;36(11):2791-2793 [PMID: 33172578]
  18. Am J Sports Med. 2009 May;37(5):929-36 [PMID: 19229046]
  19. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999 Jan-Feb;8(1):66-74 [PMID: 10077800]
  20. Arthroscopy. 1989;5(3):213-7 [PMID: 2775396]
  21. Arthroscopy. 2000 Oct;16(7):677-94 [PMID: 11027751]
  22. JBJS Rev. 2019 Sep;7(9):e10 [PMID: 31567718]
  23. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018 Oct;104(6):803-809 [PMID: 29960091]
  24. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Aug;82(8):1108-14 [PMID: 10954100]
  25. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007 Nov-Dec;16(6):742-7 [PMID: 17967548]
  26. Am J Sports Med. 2007 Jul;35(7):1168-73 [PMID: 17581976]
  27. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Nov;78(11):1677-84 [PMID: 8934481]
  28. Shoulder Elbow. 2019 Aug;11(4):265-274 [PMID: 31316587]
  29. Am J Sports Med. 1990 Jan-Feb;18(1):25-8 [PMID: 2301687]
  30. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Jun;30(6):1288-1298 [PMID: 33373683]
  31. Int Orthop. 2017 May;41(5):1023-1033 [PMID: 28039495]
  32. Sports Health. 2016 Nov/Dec;8(6):514-519 [PMID: 27694151]
  33. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Nov;28(11):2084-2089 [PMID: 31311748]
  34. Arthroscopy. 2010 Feb;26(2):239-48 [PMID: 20141987]
  35. Am J Sports Med. 2010 Oct;38(10):2071-6 [PMID: 20709942]
  36. Arthroscopy. 2012 Dec;28(12):1755-65 [PMID: 23040837]
  37. Arthroscopy. 2016 May;32(5):944-52 [PMID: 26921126]
  38. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Jun;30(6):2130-2140 [PMID: 34988633]
  39. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017 Mar 20;5(3):2325967117695788 [PMID: 28377932]
  40. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Aug;31(8):1751-1762 [PMID: 35398165]
  41. Int Orthop. 2011 Aug;35(8):1187-95 [PMID: 21369793]
  42. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 May;31(5):978-983 [PMID: 34871729]
  43. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 May;28(5):e156-e163 [PMID: 30685274]
  44. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Jan 16;101(2):e6 [PMID: 30653051]
  45. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Sep;32(9):1812-1818 [PMID: 37419438]
  46. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Dec;42(12):2842-50 [PMID: 25378207]
  47. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Oct;89(10):2124-31 [PMID: 17908886]
  48. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2019 Mar-Apr;10(2):222-230 [PMID: 30828182]
  49. Am J Sports Med. 2002 Jul-Aug;30(4):576-80 [PMID: 12130413]
  50. Orthopedics. 2014 Mar;37(3):e292-7 [PMID: 24762158]
  51. Arthroscopy. 2012 Apr;28(4):565-75 [PMID: 22336435]
  52. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1956 Oct;38-A(5):957-77 [PMID: 13367074]
  53. Int Orthop. 2018 Oct;42(10):2413-2422 [PMID: 29982868]
  54. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Apr;470(4):961-4 [PMID: 22258562]
  55. Sports Health. 2010 Mar;2(2):156-65 [PMID: 23015933]
  56. Arthroscopy. 1999 Jul-Aug;15(5):507-14 [PMID: 10424554]
  57. Arthroscopy. 2020 Sep;36(9):2526-2532 [PMID: 32389771]
  58. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 May;28(5):869-874 [PMID: 30509611]
  59. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 Dec;101(8):889-93 [PMID: 26563924]
  60. Arthroscopy. 2019 Apr;35(4):1257-1266 [PMID: 30954117]
  61. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Dec;78(12):1801-7 [PMID: 8986656]
  62. Am J Sports Med. 2023 May;51(6):1634-1643 [PMID: 35148222]
  63. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 May;90(5):945-52 [PMID: 18451384]
  64. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2020 Dec 26;3(1):e163-e170 [PMID: 33615260]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0shoulderlabralrepairdislocationsurgerylikelyreceivevariablespatientsarthroscopicposteriorconcomitantsignificantlyinjurySDsMDsstudyreceivedsinglemultipleanteriortimedislocatorsdifferencesbicepsdemographicvsdislocationsPatientsincludedinstabilityagesexindexnumbertearproceduresgroupsyearsSDmonthslabrumremplissageinitialHypothesis:purposeidentifycompareclinicalhistoricalintraoperativetreatmentMethods:retrospectivechartreviewunderwentsixsurgeonsinstitution20122020documentedpain-onlysubluxation-onlymultidirectionalpriorsurgerieskindexcludedStudiedlateralitybodymasscontact/collisionsportsCharlsoncomorbiditytobaccouse1>1sizefirstanchorStudycomparedusingstudent'st-testsMann-WhitneyUtestcontinuouschi-squareFisher'sexacttestsdiscretesignificance005Results:Sixhundredthirty-threeidentified35185[SDs]266[MDs]metinclusioncriteriameanage:27range:14-71sooner17 ± 44MD53 ± 74postinitial30/8535%56/26621%46/26617%5/856%11/8513%11/2664%tenotomy/tenodesissignificantcharacteristicsConclusion:willprocedureyetlesstenodesis/tenotomydespiteactivitylevelWhethergreaterextentduesevereearlierrecognitioninterventionrequiresSingledemonstratehigherratesstabilizationAnteriorArthroscopicLabralLabrumRemplissageShoulder

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.