Insect frass fertilizer as a regenerative input for improved biological nitrogen fixation and sustainable bush bean production.

Agnes Chepkorir, Dennis Beesigamukama, Harun I Gitari, Shaphan Y Chia, Sevgan Subramanian, Sunday Ekesi, Birachi Eliud Abucheli, Jean Claude Rubyogo, Theodore Zahariadis, Gina Athanasiou, Aikaterini Zachariadi, Vasileios Zachariadis, Abdou Tenkouano, Chrysantus M Tanga
Author Information
  1. Agnes Chepkorir: International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Nairobi, Kenya.
  2. Dennis Beesigamukama: International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Nairobi, Kenya.
  3. Harun I Gitari: Department of Agricultural Science and Technology, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya.
  4. Shaphan Y Chia: International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Nairobi, Kenya.
  5. Sevgan Subramanian: International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Nairobi, Kenya.
  6. Sunday Ekesi: International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Nairobi, Kenya.
  7. Birachi Eliud Abucheli: International Centre for Tropical Agriculture, Kigali, Rwanda.
  8. Jean Claude Rubyogo: International Centre for Tropical Agriculture, Nairobi, Kenya.
  9. Theodore Zahariadis: Synelixis Solutions S.A., Chalkida, Greece.
  10. Gina Athanasiou: Synelixis Solutions S.A., Chalkida, Greece.
  11. Aikaterini Zachariadi: Synelixis Solutions S.A., Chalkida, Greece.
  12. Vasileios Zachariadis: Synelixis Solutions S.A., Chalkida, Greece.
  13. Abdou Tenkouano: International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Nairobi, Kenya.
  14. Chrysantus M Tanga: International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Nairobi, Kenya.

Abstract

Bush bean ( L.) production is undermined by soil degradation and low biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) capacity. This study evaluated the effect of black soldier fly frass fertilizer (BSFFF) on bush bean growth, yield, nutrient uptake, BNF, and profitability, in comparison with commercial organic fertilizer (Phymyx, Phytomedia International Ltd., Kiambu, Kenya), synthetic fertilizer (NPK), and rhizobia inoculant (Biofix, MEA Fertilizers, Nairobi, Kenya). The organic fertilizers were applied at rates of 0, 15, 30, and 45 kg N ha while the NPK was applied at 40 kg N ha, 46 kg P ha, and 60 kg K ha. The fertilizers were applied singly and in combination with rhizobia inoculant to determine the interactive effects on bush bean production. Results showed that beans grown using BSFFF were the tallest, with the broadest leaves, and the highest chlorophyll content. Plots treated with 45 kg N ha BSFFF produced beans with more flowers (7 - 8%), pods (4 - 9%), and seeds (9 - 11%) compared to Phymyx and NPK treatments. The same treatment also produced beans with 6, 8, and 18% higher 100-seed weight, compared to NPK, Phymyx, and control treatments, respectively. Beans grown in soil amended with 30 kg N ha of BSFFF had 3-14-fold higher effective root nodules, fixed 48%, 31%, and 91% more N compared to Phymyx, NPK, and rhizobia, respectively, and boosted N uptake (19 - 39%) compared to Phymyx and NPK treatments. Application of 45 kg N ha of BSFFF increased bean seed yield by 43%, 72%, and 67% compared to the control, NPK and equivalent rate of Phymyx, respectively. The net income and gross margin achieved using BSFFF treatments were 73 - 239% and 118 - 184% higher than the values obtained under Phymyx treatments. Our findings demonstrate the high efficacy of BSFFF as a novel soil input and sustainable alternative for boosting BNF and improving bush bean productivity.

Keywords

References

  1. Front Plant Sci. 2024 Mar 05;15:1361739 [PMID: 38504884]
  2. Front Plant Sci. 2024 Feb 23;15:1343038 [PMID: 38463573]
  3. Trends Plant Sci. 2022 Jul;27(7):646-654 [PMID: 35248491]
  4. Anal Chem. 1994 Jun 15;66(12):252R-279R [PMID: 8092468]
  5. Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 23;12(1):6671 [PMID: 35461340]
  6. Front Plant Sci. 2021 Jun 02;12:680312 [PMID: 34149781]
  7. Chem Biol. 2005 Sep;12(9):1029-40 [PMID: 16183027]
  8. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2009 Jun;12(3):259-66 [PMID: 19524482]
  9. Heliyon. 2020 Oct 17;6(10):e05207 [PMID: 33102841]
  10. Ann Bot. 2006 Oct;98(4):731-40 [PMID: 16855013]
  11. Microorganisms. 2021 Nov 23;9(12): [PMID: 34946019]
  12. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004 Nov;54(Pt 6):2269-2273 [PMID: 15545469]
  13. Plants (Basel). 2020 Aug 11;9(8): [PMID: 32796519]
  14. Anim Front. 2023 Aug 14;13(4):26-40 [PMID: 37583795]
  15. Front Microbiol. 2020 Nov 23;11:582867 [PMID: 33329446]
  16. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 May 05;117(18):9822-9831 [PMID: 32317381]
  17. Front Physiol. 2013 Mar 06;4:35 [PMID: 23507928]
  18. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2018 Nov 1;266:167-173 [PMID: 30393414]
  19. Front Plant Sci. 2019 Feb 05;10:73 [PMID: 30804964]
  20. Plant Breed. 2019 Aug;138(4):401-414 [PMID: 31728074]
  21. PLoS One. 2020 Sep 24;15(9):e0239552 [PMID: 32970779]
  22. PLoS One. 2015 Jun 10;10(6):e0127401 [PMID: 26061704]
  23. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 May;29(23):33909-33919 [PMID: 35031990]
  24. Sci Total Environ. 2023 Dec 1;902:166067 [PMID: 37544444]
  25. Sci Rep. 2022 May 3;12(1):7182 [PMID: 35505193]
  26. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017 Oct;67(10):3937-3945 [PMID: 28895521]
  27. Waste Manag. 2020 Nov;117:58-80 [PMID: 32805602]
  28. Animals (Basel). 2019 Sep 20;9(10): [PMID: 31546995]
  29. Microorganisms. 2022 Jan 13;10(1): [PMID: 35056613]
  30. Plants (Basel). 2021 May 30;10(6): [PMID: 34070891]
  31. Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 20;11(1):14799 [PMID: 34285297]
  32. Front Plant Sci. 2020 Aug 06;11:1172 [PMID: 32849727]
  33. Front Plant Sci. 2020 Sep 23;11:574592 [PMID: 33072150]
  34. Front Plant Sci. 2017 Feb 07;8:141 [PMID: 28224000]
  35. Plant Cell Environ. 2020 Aug;43(8):1958-1972 [PMID: 32430922]
  36. Waste Manag. 2021 Jan 1;119:183-194 [PMID: 33068885]
  37. Bioresour Technol. 2010 Jan;101(1):396-403 [PMID: 19699086]
  38. J Food Sci Technol. 2016 Mar;53(3):1634-9 [PMID: 27570288]
  39. Front Plant Sci. 2017 Mar 31;8:443 [PMID: 28408912]
  40. Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 12;9(1):10110 [PMID: 31300713]
  41. PLoS One. 2015 Sep 22;10(9):e0136244 [PMID: 26393517]
  42. Bioresour Technol. 2014 Aug;166:96-102 [PMID: 24907568]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0beanBSFFFPhymyxNPKNhafertilizer-bushcomparedtreatmentssoilproductionnitrogenfixationBNFfrassyieldrhizobiaapplied45 kgbeanshigherrespectivelybiologicaluptakeorganicKenyainoculantfertilizersgrownusingproducedcontrolinputsustainableBushLundermineddegradationlowcapacitystudyevaluatedeffectblacksoldierflygrowthnutrientprofitabilitycomparisoncommercialPhytomediaInternationalLtdKiambusyntheticBiofixMEAFertilizersNairobirates0153040 kg46 kgP60 kgKsinglycombinationdetermineinteractiveeffectsResultsshowedtallestbroadestleaveshighestchlorophyllcontentPlotstreatedflowers78%pods49%seeds911%treatmentalso6818%100-seedweightBeansamended30 kg3-14-foldeffectiverootnodulesfixed48%31%91%boosted1939%Applicationincreasedseed43%72%67%equivalentratenetincomegrossmarginachieved73239%118184%valuesobtainedfindingsdemonstratehighefficacynovelalternativeboostingimprovingproductivityInsectregenerativeimprovedBSFcirculareconomyclimate-smarthealthsymbiotic

Similar Articles

Cited By