The impact of vaccine hesitancy on psychological impairment among healthcare workers in a Total Worker Health approach.

Reparata Rosa Di Prinzio, Bianca Ceresi, Gabriele Arnesano, Alessia Dosi, Mariarita Maimone, Maria Eugenia Vacca, Maria Rosaria Vinci, Vincenzo Camisa, Annapaola Santoro, Massimiliano Raponi, Paola Tomao, Nicoletta Vonesch, Umberto Moscato, Salvatore Zaffina, Guendalina Dalmasso
Author Information
  1. Reparata Rosa Di Prinzio: Occupational Medicine Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
  2. Bianca Ceresi: Occupational Medicine Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
  3. Gabriele Arnesano: Postgraduate School of Occupational Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
  4. Alessia Dosi: Occupational Medicine Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
  5. Mariarita Maimone: Postgraduate School of Occupational Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
  6. Maria Eugenia Vacca: Postgraduate School of Occupational Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
  7. Maria Rosaria Vinci: Occupational Medicine Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
  8. Vincenzo Camisa: Occupational Medicine Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
  9. Annapaola Santoro: Occupational Medicine Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
  10. Massimiliano Raponi: Health Directorate, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
  11. Paola Tomao: Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene Department, Italian Workers' Compensation Authority (INAIL), Rome, Italy.
  12. Nicoletta Vonesch: Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene Department, Italian Workers' Compensation Authority (INAIL), Rome, Italy.
  13. Umberto Moscato: Postgraduate School of Occupational Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
  14. Salvatore Zaffina: Occupational Medicine Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
  15. Guendalina Dalmasso: Health Directorate, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Abstract

Introduction: Vaccination practice is a well-known individual protective measure for biological risk in healthcare. During the COVID-19 pandemic vaccine hesitancy has grown among healthcare workers (HCWs). The study aims to investigate how vaccine hesitancy influences the psychological burden experienced by healthcare workers.
Methods: This study aimed to explore attitudes of HCWs in acceptance or refusal of vaccinations related to the risk of psychological impairment (PI) and describe the associated occupational factors, during the seasonal flu/COVID-19 vaccination campaign of 2022-2023. 302 HCWs were enrolled in the study. A questionnaire was self-administered, including two scales on the risk of psychological impairment (Psychological Injury Risk Indicator, PIRI) and vaccine hesitancy (Adult Vaccine Hesitancy Scale, AVHS).
Results: PIRI scores revealed that 29.8% of participants were at risk of PI. Differences in sex, age, occupational seniority, professional category, and night shifts were found between HCWs at risk of PI and those not at risk. Females registered a four-fold higher risk than males (85.6% vs. 14.4%, χ = 4.450,  < 0.05). Nurses were the highest risk category, followed by physicians and technicians (54.4% vs. 30.0% vs. 12.2%, χ = 14.463,  < 0.001). 41.7% of participants received the flu vaccination, and 98.9% received the COVID-19 vaccine. HCWs were prone to being vaccinated to protect patients and family members. Conversely, vaccine refusal was attributed to the perception of flu vaccines as not beneficial and COVID-19 contagion at low risk. The latter was more frequently reported for HCWs at risk of PI (16.7% vs. 4.7%, χ = 11.882,  = 0.001). Finally, hesitant HCWs were at higher risk of psychological impairment than others.
Discussion: HCWs expressed vaccine acceptance considering their social role in the community as protectors. However, the underestimation of the risk of severity of COVID-19 was more relevant among HCWs at risk of PI than others. Psychological aspects need to be considered by healthcare providers when fighting vaccine hesitancy.

Keywords

References

  1. Health Promot Int. 2022 Feb 17;37(1): [PMID: 34244738]
  2. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 02;19(15): [PMID: 35954849]
  3. J Clin Nurs. 2022 Jan;31(1-2):62-86 [PMID: 34227179]
  4. Front Immunol. 2021 Jul 23;12:690534 [PMID: 34367150]
  5. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2024 Jan 24;77(1):34-39 [PMID: 37914292]
  6. Front Immunol. 2022 Apr 06;13:869042 [PMID: 35464479]
  7. Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Feb 27;11(3): [PMID: 36992140]
  8. Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Jan 31;10(2): [PMID: 35214682]
  9. Med Pr. 2013;64(1):119-29 [PMID: 23650773]
  10. J Occup Environ Med. 2013 Dec;55(12 Suppl):S8-11 [PMID: 24284752]
  11. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 27;23(1):1167 [PMID: 37891521]
  12. Postgrad Med J. 2023 Jun 15;99(1172):520-528 [PMID: 37319159]
  13. Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol. 2023 Winter;72(1):25-39 [PMID: 37185023]
  14. Vaccine. 2014 Dec 5;32(51):6902-6910 [PMID: 25444815]
  15. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2019 Apr;18(4):411-418 [PMID: 30919703]
  16. Public Health Nurs. 2024 Jan-Feb;41(1):10-21 [PMID: 37668422]
  17. Psychiatry Investig. 2023 Sep;20(9):808-817 [PMID: 37794662]
  18. Ann Med. 2022 Dec;54(1):274-282 [PMID: 35067149]
  19. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 18;16(20): [PMID: 31635299]
  20. J Glob Health. 2022 Dec 21;12:05057 [PMID: 36538389]
  21. Cell Host Microbe. 2022 Mar 9;30(3):400-408.e4 [PMID: 35134333]
  22. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2023 Dec 15;19(3):2273697 [PMID: 37961893]
  23. Vaccine. 2015 Aug 14;33(34):4161-4 [PMID: 25896383]
  24. N Engl J Med. 2022 Jul 7;387(1):58-65 [PMID: 35767527]
  25. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Sep 17;57(9): [PMID: 34577900]
  26. J Community Health. 2021 Dec;46(6):1244-1251 [PMID: 33877534]
  27. BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Sep;6(9): [PMID: 34593513]
  28. Vaccine. 2014 Apr 17;32(19):2150-9 [PMID: 24598724]
  29. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018 Mar 4;14(3):772-789 [PMID: 28787234]
  30. Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 06;11:1295464 [PMID: 38026311]
  31. Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2024 May;16(2):597-614 [PMID: 37942873]
  32. Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Jan 12;10(1): [PMID: 35062771]
  33. J Clin Nurs. 2022 Aug;31(15-16):2112-2124 [PMID: 34716635]
  34. PLoS One. 2023 Jul 28;18(7):e0289295 [PMID: 37506132]
  35. J Behav Med. 2023 Apr;46(1-2):9-14 [PMID: 35635594]
  36. Vaccine. 2017 Sep 5;35(37):4840-4850 [PMID: 28760616]
  37. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020 Sep - Oct;14(5):779-788 [PMID: 32526627]
  38. Psychiatr Danub. 2023 Summer;35(2):226-231 [PMID: 37480310]
  39. J Public Health (Oxf). 2023 Aug 28;45(3):e522-e531 [PMID: 37147915]
  40. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2019 Apr;62(4):400-409 [PMID: 30805674]
  41. Future Microbiol. 2019 Jun;14:9-14 [PMID: 31210537]
  42. N Engl J Med. 2021 Dec 16;385(25):e90 [PMID: 34551224]
  43. Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Jun 15;10(6): [PMID: 35746556]
  44. ScientificWorldJournal. 2015;2015:720193 [PMID: 25839055]
  45. J Occup Environ Med. 2009 Sep;51(9):1057-65 [PMID: 19730400]
  46. Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 28;10:941206 [PMID: 35968421]
  47. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 23;20(1): [PMID: 36612518]
  48. PLoS One. 2023 Apr 12;18(4):e0280439 [PMID: 37043505]
  49. Annu Rev Public Health. 2021 Apr 1;42:175-191 [PMID: 33798403]
  50. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2022 Sep;21(9):1289-1300 [PMID: 35757890]

MeSH Term

Humans
Male
Female
Health Personnel
Adult
Vaccination Hesitancy
COVID-19
Surveys and Questionnaires
Middle Aged
COVID-19 Vaccines
Vaccination
Occupational Health
SARS-CoV-2
Attitude of Health Personnel

Chemicals

COVID-19 Vaccines

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0riskvaccineHCWshealthcareCOVID-19hesitancypsychologicalPIimpairmentvsamongworkersstudyacceptancerefusal7%fluoccupationalvaccinationPsychologicalPIRIparticipantscategoryhigher4%< 0001receivedothersIntroduction:Vaccinationpracticewell-knownindividualprotectivemeasurebiologicalpandemicgrownaimsinvestigateinfluencesburdenexperiencedMethods:aimedexploreattitudesvaccinationsrelateddescribeassociatedfactorsseasonalflu/COVID-19campaign2022-2023302enrolledquestionnaireself-administeredincludingtwoscalesInjuryRiskIndicatorAdultVaccineHesitancyScaleAVHSResults:scoresrevealed298%DifferencessexageseniorityprofessionalnightshiftsfoundFemalesregisteredfour-foldmales856%14χ = 445005Nurseshighestfollowedphysicianstechnicians54300%122%χ = 1446341989%pronevaccinatedprotectpatientsfamilymembersConverselyattributedperceptionvaccinesbeneficialcontagionlowlatterfrequentlyreported164χ = 11882 = 0FinallyhesitantDiscussion:expressedconsideringsocialrolecommunityprotectorsHoweverunderestimationseverityrelevantaspectsneedconsideredprovidersfightingimpactTotalWorkerHealthapproachmentalhealthnurse

Similar Articles

Cited By (2)