Cervical cancer is a common malignant tumor of the female reproductive system and the leading cause of death among women worldwide. The survival prediction method can be used to effectively analyze the time to event, which is essential in any clinical study. This study aims to bridge the gap between traditional statistical methods and machine learning in survival analysis by revealing which techniques are most effective in predicting survival, with a particular emphasis on improving prediction accuracy and identifying key risk factors for cervical cancer. Women with cervical cancer diagnosed between 2013 and 2015 were included in our study using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Using this dataset, the study assesses the performance of Weibull, Cox proportional hazards models, and Random Survival Forests in terms of predictive accuracy and risk factor identification. The findings reveal that machine learning models, particularly Random Survival Forests (RSF), outperform traditional statistical methods in both predictive accuracy and the discernment of crucial prognostic factors, underscoring the advantages of machine learning in handling complex survival data. However, for a survival dataset with a small number of predictors, statistical models should be used first. The study finds that RSF models enhance survival analysis with more accurate predictions and insights into survival risk factors but highlights the need for larger datasets and further research on model interpretability and clinical applicability.
