Analytical validation of the LungLB test: a 4-color fluorescence in-situ hybridization assay for the evaluation of indeterminate pulmonary nodules.

Michelle L Lutman, Daniel Gramajo-Leventon, Shahram Tahvilian, Lara Baden, Courtney L Gilbert, Michael Trejo, Eric Vail, Michael J Donovan, Benjamin A Katchman, Paul C Pagano
Author Information
  1. Michelle L Lutman: LungLife AI, Inc., 2545 W. Hillcrest Drive, Suite 140, Thousand Oaks, CA, 91320, USA.
  2. Daniel Gramajo-Leventon: LungLife AI, Inc., 2545 W. Hillcrest Drive, Suite 140, Thousand Oaks, CA, 91320, USA.
  3. Shahram Tahvilian: LungLife AI, Inc., 2545 W. Hillcrest Drive, Suite 140, Thousand Oaks, CA, 91320, USA.
  4. Lara Baden: LungLife AI, Inc., 2545 W. Hillcrest Drive, Suite 140, Thousand Oaks, CA, 91320, USA.
  5. Courtney L Gilbert: LungLife AI, Inc., 2545 W. Hillcrest Drive, Suite 140, Thousand Oaks, CA, 91320, USA.
  6. Michael Trejo: LungLife AI, Inc., 2545 W. Hillcrest Drive, Suite 140, Thousand Oaks, CA, 91320, USA.
  7. Eric Vail: LungLife AI, Inc., 2545 W. Hillcrest Drive, Suite 140, Thousand Oaks, CA, 91320, USA.
  8. Michael J Donovan: LungLife AI, Inc., 2545 W. Hillcrest Drive, Suite 140, Thousand Oaks, CA, 91320, USA.
  9. Benjamin A Katchman: LungLife AI, Inc., 2545 W. Hillcrest Drive, Suite 140, Thousand Oaks, CA, 91320, USA.
  10. Paul C Pagano: LungLife AI, Inc., 2545 W. Hillcrest Drive, Suite 140, Thousand Oaks, CA, 91320, USA. ppagano@lunglifeai.com.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of indeterminate pulmonary nodules (IPNs) often creates a diagnostic conundrum which may delay the early detection of lung cancer. Rare circulating genetically abnormal cells (CGAC) have previously demonstrated utility as a biomarker for discriminating benign from malignant small IPNs in the LungLB assay. CGAC are identified using a unique 4-color fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) assay and are thought to reflect early cell-based events in lung cancer pathogenesis and the anti-tumor immune response. LungLB is a prognostic tool that combines the CGAC biomarker and clinical features to aid in IPN evaluation by improving the stratification of patient risk of malignancy.
METHODS: Herein we describe the analytical performance of the LungLB blood test. Analytical validation was performed according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines with adaptations for rare cell-based assays. Multiple operators, reagent lots, and assay runs were tested to examine accuracy, precision, reproducibility, and interfering factors.
RESULTS: The FISH probes used in the LungLB assay demonstrate 100% sensitivity and specificity for their intended chromosomal loci (3q29, 3p22.1, 10q22.3 and 10cen). LungLB demonstrates analytical sensitivity of 10 CGAC per 10,000 lymphocytes analyzed, 100% analytical specificity, and high linearity (R = 0.9971). Within run measurements across 100 samples demonstrated 96% reproducibility. Interfering factors normally found in blood (lipemia, biotin) and exposure to adverse temperatures (-20ºC or 37ºC) did not interfere with results. Sample stability was validated to 96 hours.
CONCLUSION: The analytical performance of LungLB in this validation study successfully demonstrates it is robust and suitable for everyday clinical use.

Keywords

References

  1. Front Oncol. 2021 Mar 11;11:638223 [PMID: 33777797]
  2. JCI Insight. 2019 Mar 7;4(5): [PMID: 30702443]
  3. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar;148(3):685-695 [PMID: 33893839]
  4. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2017 Sep;10(9):514-524 [PMID: 28754664]
  5. Nat Med. 2019 Oct;25(10):1534-1539 [PMID: 31591595]
  6. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Aug;92(2):428-32; discussion 433 [PMID: 21592456]
  7. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2021 Jul 1;27(4):240-248 [PMID: 33973553]
  8. Neoplasia. 2004 Sep-Oct;6(5):623-35 [PMID: 15548372]
  9. Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Nov 15;15(22):6980-6 [PMID: 19887487]
  10. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021 Feb;10(2):1165-1185 [PMID: 33718054]
  11. JAMA Surg. 2018 Apr 1;153(4):329-334 [PMID: 29117314]
  12. Chest. 2023 Oct;164(4):1028-1041 [PMID: 37244587]
  13. Cancer Cytopathol. 2020 Aug;128(8):553-562 [PMID: 32320527]
  14. BMC Pulm Med. 2023 Jun 5;23(1):193 [PMID: 37277788]
  15. Cancer. 2024 Apr 15;130(8):1330-1348 [PMID: 38279776]
  16. Ann Oncol. 2019 Feb 1;30(2):290-296 [PMID: 30535340]
  17. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Nov 15;192(10):1208-14 [PMID: 26214244]

MeSH Term

Humans
In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
Lung Neoplasms
Reproducibility of Results
Multiple Pulmonary Nodules
Biomarkers, Tumor
Sensitivity and Specificity
Neoplastic Cells, Circulating

Chemicals

Biomarkers, Tumor

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0LungLBCGACassayanalyticalvalidationlungAnalyticalindeterminatepulmonarynodulesIPNsearlycancerdemonstratedbiomarker4-colorfluorescencein-situhybridizationFISHcell-basedclinicalevaluationperformancebloodreproducibilityfactors100%sensitivityspecificitydemonstrates10BACKGROUND:EvaluationoftencreatesdiagnosticconundrummaydelaydetectionRarecirculatinggeneticallyabnormalcellspreviouslyutilitydiscriminatingbenignmalignantsmallidentifiedusinguniquethoughtreflecteventspathogenesisanti-tumorimmuneresponse LungLBprognostic toolcombinesfeaturesaidIPNimprovingstratificationpatientriskmalignancyMETHODS:HereindescribetestperformedaccordingClinicalLaboratoryStandardsInstituteCLSIguidelinesadaptationsrareassaysMultipleoperatorsreagentlotsrunstestedexamineaccuracyprecisioninterferingRESULTS:probesuseddemonstrateintendedchromosomalloci3q293p22110q22310cenper000lymphocytesanalyzedhighlinearityR = 09971Withinrunmeasurementsacross100samples96%Interferingnormallyfoundlipemiabiotinexposureadversetemperatures-20ºC37ºCinterfereresultsSamplestabilityvalidated96 hoursCONCLUSION:studysuccessfullyrobustsuitableeverydayusetest:CirculatingGeneticallyAbnormalCellIndeterminatenodule

Similar Articles

Cited By