Effects of Different Processed Diets on Growth Performance, Blood Parameters, Hair Quality and Fecal Microbiota in Ragdoll Cats.

Peng Wang, Xin Tian, Jie Feng
Author Information
  1. Peng Wang: Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed of Zhejiang Province, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China.
  2. Xin Tian: Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed of Zhejiang Province, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China. ORCID
  3. Jie Feng: Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed of Zhejiang Province, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China. ORCID

Abstract

In recent years, there has been ongoing debate about the dietary choices for pet cats, particularly regarding three options: extruded dry food, cooked meat, and raw meat. Determining which diet is most suitable for a cat's healthy growth still requires substantial empirical support. Our study aimed to evaluate the effects of feeding Ragdoll cats ( = 5/group) extruded dry food (ED), cooked meat (CM), and raw meat (RM) on their growth performance, apparent digestibility, fur condition, blood parameters, fecal scores, and gut microbiota composition. However, our results indicate that different types of diets did not significantly affect the daily weight gain of Ragdoll cats. The CM group showed a significant improvement in the digestibility of dry matter, fat and protein compared to the ED group ( < 0.05) but no improvement in that of fat compared to the RM group. Compared to the ED group, both the CM and RM groups showed significant improvements in fur condition while exhibiting a significant decrease in fecal scores ( < 0.05). The CM and RM groups exhibited enhanced serum antioxidant capacity ( < 0.05) and increased immunity in the cats ( < 0.05). Immunity enhancement in the CM group was significantly higher than that in the RM group( < 0.05). The ED group showed an increase in the abundance of beneficial bacteria in Ragdoll cat intestines, while the CM and RM groups showed enhancements in the innate microbiota of feline animals. These data, to some extent, suggest that CM is the most suitable diet for Ragdoll cats, but further research on intestine microbiota is still needed. These study findings provide a reference for purebred pet breeding purposes.

Keywords

References

  1. Front Microbiol. 2022 Jul 04;13:838164 [PMID: 35859746]
  2. J Anim Sci. 2019 Mar 1;97(3):998-1009 [PMID: 30535325]
  3. Metabolites. 2022 Nov 16;12(11): [PMID: 36422265]
  4. Animals (Basel). 2022 Aug 25;12(17): [PMID: 36077904]
  5. J Anim Sci. 2014 Aug;92(8):3441-8 [PMID: 25074451]
  6. BMC Vet Res. 2017 Feb 28;13(1):65 [PMID: 28245817]
  7. Can Vet J. 2005 Jun;46(6):513-6 [PMID: 16048011]
  8. ISME J. 2015 Mar 17;9(4):832-43 [PMID: 25343515]
  9. Avian Dis. 2010 Mar;54(1):33-40 [PMID: 20408396]
  10. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2018 Feb 15;24(3):558-572 [PMID: 29462379]
  11. Zoo Biol. 2010 Nov-Dec;29(6):676-86 [PMID: 20095004]
  12. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2013 Dec 1;243(11):1549-58 [PMID: 24261804]
  13. Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 12;7(1):11332 [PMID: 28900198]
  14. J Med Microbiol. 2005 Nov;54(Pt 11):1093-1101 [PMID: 16192442]
  15. Proteomics. 2008 Jul;8(13):2691-703 [PMID: 18546150]
  16. J Feline Med Surg. 2017 Apr;19(4):424-434 [PMID: 26927818]
  17. AMB Express. 2018 Aug 2;8(1):123 [PMID: 30073560]
  18. Front Microbiol. 2022 Nov 25;13:1044986 [PMID: 36504773]
  19. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2018 Apr;182(2):257-264 [PMID: 28689237]
  20. Front Microbiol. 2018 Jun 19;9:1231 [PMID: 29971046]
  21. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2013 Jun;84(3):532-41 [PMID: 23360519]
  22. Animals (Basel). 2022 Apr 08;12(8): [PMID: 35454218]
  23. Anim Microbiome. 2023 Oct 10;5(1):49 [PMID: 37817260]
  24. J Zoo Wildl Med. 1997 Jun;28(2):148-52 [PMID: 9279402]
  25. J Anim Sci. 2017 Dec;95(12):5420-5429 [PMID: 29293767]
  26. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2003 Nov-Dec;39(6):538-42 [PMID: 14736718]

Grants

  1. grant number 2022YFD1300504/the National Key Research and Development Program of China

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0CMgroupcatsRagdollRMmeat<005dryEDmicrobiotashowedextrudedfooddietfecalsignificantgroupspetcookedrawsuitablegrowthstillstudydigestibilityfurconditionscoressignificantlyimprovementfatcomparedfelinerecentyearsongoingdebatedietarychoicesparticularlyregardingthreeoptions:Determiningcat'shealthyrequiressubstantialempiricalsupportaimedevaluateeffectsfeeding=5/groupperformanceapparentbloodparametersgutcompositionHoweverresultsindicatedifferenttypesdietsaffectdailyweightgainmatterproteinComparedimprovementsexhibitingdecreaseexhibitedenhancedserumantioxidantcapacityincreasedimmunityImmunityenhancementhigherincreaseabundancebeneficialbacteriacatintestinesenhancementsinnateanimalsdataextentsuggestresearchintestineneededfindingsprovidereferencepurebredbreedingpurposesEffectsDifferentProcessedDietsGrowthPerformanceBloodParametersHairQualityFecalMicrobiotaCatsnutritionhairquality

Similar Articles

Cited By