Effectiveness of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing-EMDR Method in Patients with Chronic Subjective Tinnitus.

Fatih Bal, Muzaffer Kırış
Author Information
  1. Fatih Bal: Department of Psychology, Sakarya University, Sakarya 54187, Türkiye. ORCID
  2. Muzaffer Kırış: Department of Ear, Nose and Throat Diseases, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara 06010, Türkiye. ORCID

Abstract

This research aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) method on chronic subjective tinnitus. The research was planned as an observational study. The study group comprises individuals who applied to the training and research hospital in Ankara between 2019 and 2020 and were aged between 15 and 60 years old. They were identified as having tinnitus. The study samples were determined as 36 participants selected through purposeful sampling. The samples of the 36 participants included in the study. 12 were assigned to the 1st Group EMDR and Masking Group, 12 to the 2nd Group Masking and EMDR Group, and 12 to the 3rd Control Group. The study's dependent variable was the tinnitus levels of the participants, and the independent variable was EMDR and the Masking method. The dependent variable data of the study was collected with the Visual Analog Scale and Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI). EMDR and Masking methods used as independent variables in the study were conducted in eight sessions for two months. As a result of the Wilcoxon Sign test used to determine whether the EMDR Method is effective on tinnitus severity level, the difference between tinnitus severity level pretest and post-test median scores of tinnitus patients was found to be statistically significant. Our research findings show that the EMDR method reduces and improves chronic subjective tinnitus, and further studies with a larger sample size could confirm our results.

Keywords

References

  1. Front Neurosci. 2019 Aug 06;13:802 [PMID: 31447630]
  2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 May 17;108(20):8075-80 [PMID: 21502503]
  3. Audiol Res. 2022 May 23;12(3):281-289 [PMID: 35645199]
  4. Front Syst Neurosci. 2012 May 08;6:31 [PMID: 22586375]
  5. Am J Otol. 1992 Sep;13(5):454-64 [PMID: 1359790]
  6. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2018 Sep 11;9(1):1512248 [PMID: 30220982]
  7. Clin Psychol Rev. 2018 Mar;60:62-86 [PMID: 29366511]
  8. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg. 2014 Sep-Oct;24(5):303-10 [PMID: 25513877]
  9. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 Jan-Feb;75(1):76-9 [PMID: 19488564]
  10. BMJ. 1993 Jun 5;306(6891):1490-1 [PMID: 8518671]
  11. J Clin Nurs. 2009 Nov;18(21):2927-37 [PMID: 19735344]
  12. J Int Adv Otol. 2022 Mar;18(2):167-176 [PMID: 35418366]
  13. J Am Acad Audiol. 2014 Jan;25(1):5-22; quiz 126 [PMID: 24622858]
  14. Lancet. 2013 Nov 9;382(9904):1600-7 [PMID: 23827090]
  15. J Clin Neurol. 2009 Mar;5(1):11-9 [PMID: 19513328]
  16. Int Tinnitus J. 2007;13(2):94-8 [PMID: 18229787]
  17. Laryngoscope. 2019 Oct;129(10):2384-2390 [PMID: 30693546]
  18. Ear Hear. 2016 Sep-Oct;37(5):541-6 [PMID: 26950001]
  19. Handb Clin Neurol. 2015;129:409-31 [PMID: 25726282]
  20. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2014 Sep-Oct;29(5):432-42 [PMID: 23982788]
  21. Br J Audiol. 1985 May;19(2):65-146 [PMID: 3896355]
  22. Prog Brain Res. 2007;166:415-23 [PMID: 17956806]
  23. Laryngoscope. 1947 May;57(5):358-66 [PMID: 20241853]
  24. J Speech Hear Disord. 1983 May;48(2):150-4 [PMID: 6621006]
  25. Lancet Neurol. 2013 Sep;12(9):920-930 [PMID: 23948178]
  26. BMJ. 2015 Apr 17;350:h2053 [PMID: 25888112]
  27. Laryngoscope. 2017 Feb;127(2):466-469 [PMID: 27301552]
  28. Ear Nose Throat J. 2022 Nov 8;:1455613221139211 [PMID: 36346819]
  29. Am J Otolaryngol. 2023 Jan-Feb;44(1):103669 [PMID: 36283164]
  30. Prog Brain Res. 2021;262:431-450 [PMID: 33931190]
  31. Pharmacotherapy. 2017 Dec;37(12):1600-1616 [PMID: 29023930]
  32. Pain. 2012 Jun;153(6):1253-1262 [PMID: 22607985]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0EMDRtinnitusstudyGroupresearchMaskingmethodparticipants12variableEyeMovementDesensitizationchronicsubjectivesamples36dependentindependentTinnitususedMethodseveritylevelaimedinvestigateeffectivenessReprocessingplannedobservationalgroupcomprisesindividualsappliedtraininghospitalAnkara20192020aged1560yearsoldidentifieddeterminedselectedpurposefulsamplingincludedassigned1st2nd3rdControlstudy'slevelsdatacollectedVisualAnalogScaleHandicapInventoryTHImethodsvariablesconductedeightsessionstwomonthsresultWilcoxonSigntestdeterminewhethereffectivedifferencepretestpost-testmedianscorespatientsfoundstatisticallysignificantfindingsshowreducesimprovesstudieslargersamplesizeconfirmresultsEffectivenessReprocessing-EMDRPatientsChronicSubjectivepsychotherapy

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.